Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Shorty McShort wrote:

Flagpole for Prez wrote:

No doubt you would take his crown.

You're a rock star.

Unfortunately, there is a provision in the Constitution that the POTUS has to be at least 5'6".

Sorry, Flag.

Plus, we already have a fat guy as president. Look how that has turned out. We don’t need another one.

Oh, are you a little snowflake?! I love how Trumpers attack the person, but not the message. How's that memo working out for you?!

Gotta love Comey throwing some shade:

"Special Agent Andrew McCabe stood tall over the last 8 months, when small people were trying to tear down an institution we all depend on. He served with distinction for two decades. I wish Andy well. I also wish continued strength for the rest of the FBI. America needs you."

"All should appreciate the FBI speaking up. I wish more of our leaders would. But take heart: American history shows that, in the long run, weasels and liars never hold the field, so long as good people stand up. Not a lot of schools or streets named for Joe McCarthy."

BTW, weasel rhythms with treason!

"That’s it? Dishonest and misleading memo wrecked the House intel committee, destroyed trust with Intelligence Community, damaged relationship with FISA court, and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen. For what? DOJ & FBI must keep doing their jobs."

Comey is my homey!!!

Weren't Republicans once the party of law and order?!

f*ck... "rhymes with treason."

nontrumper supports mass-murderers... Hillary and Bill Kristol.

nontrumper wrote:

The hits keep coming:

www wsj com /articles/inside-the-fbi-life-of-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page-as-told-in-their-text-messages-1517589380

YAWN . . . WSJ is owned by a diehard Trumpkin.

Strzok was a primary author of the October Surprise that "reopened" the Hillary email nothingburger that got Trump elected.

No fat prez wrote:

Plus, we already have a fat guy as president. Look how that has turned out. We don’t need another one.

Taft actually lost weight while he was president. Trump has flipped that, and he is well over Taft's weight when Taft ended his term. Expect more ballooning from Trump--300+ pounds he he comes.

Boy, if there was ever a better illustration of the adage "No good deed goes unpunished," I'd like to see it. Fifteen months ago, Comey issued his October surprise, re-opening the Hillary e-mail investigation, when Anthony Wiener's laptop contents came to light. That little announcement was just enough to swing the election to Trump in the three "Blue Wall" states. Remember - at the same time, the FBI was quietly investigating Trump and his campaign, for their Russian ties, and not a peep out of the FBI regarding that. Now, this recently released memo, which is incomplete and misleading, argues that the FBI is full of Hillary supporters and liberals, and has all along been engaged in a witch hunt against Trump. Really - how dumb would you have to be to buy into that crock?

Fatburgers wrote:

Taft actually lost weight while he was president. Trump has flipped that, and he is well over Taft's weight when Taft ended his term. Expect more ballooning from Trump--300+ pounds he he comes.

This is true. Taft was obese but worked to control his weight. Trump . . . not so much.

Rigged for Trump. wrote:

Boy, if there was ever a better illustration of the adage "No good deed goes unpunished," I'd like to see it. Fifteen months ago, Comey issued his October surprise, re-opening the Hillary e-mail investigation, when Anthony Wiener's laptop contents came to light. That little announcement was just enough to swing the election to Trump in the three "Blue Wall" states. Remember - at the same time, the FBI was quietly investigating Trump and his campaign, for their Russian ties, and not a peep out of the FBI regarding that. Now, this recently released memo, which is incomplete and misleading, argues that the FBI is full of Hillary supporters and liberals, and has all along been engaged in a witch hunt against Trump. Really - how dumb would you have to be to buy into that crock?

And add that Strzok who is attacked as a Deep State Democrat in the Nunes Memo was an author of the October Surprise that got Trump elected.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Khangar wrote:

The democrats and the media are bending backwards to support massive, uncountable secret government agencies with long histories of abuse of power and surveillance when someone wants to release information showing abuse of power and surveillance for political reasons in those agencies.

As you will see, I will receive no reasonable, intellectual rebuttal of this observation.

I sort of feel like the world has turned upside down.

You are more than a decade late and you can blame Cheney. And then there's the simple fact Congress just reauthorized domestic spying, again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/bush-lets-us-spy-on-callers-without-courts.html

Nunes is the bad actor with Conservative Justice Warriors supporting him. He should be full of shame for his repeated attempts at breaking the Republic.

He's a hero for revealing the truth to the American people.....This ain't over...believe me....

Fire the FBI wrote:Nunes is Trump's Himmler.

How about a less "murdery" Heydrich?

Nunes is toxic to the Republic.

Rigged for Trump. wrote:

Now, this recently released memo, which is incomplete and misleading, argues that the FBI is full of Hillary supporters and liberals, and has all along been engaged in a witch hunt against Trump. Really - how dumb would you have to be to buy into that crock?

A foreword in a book doesn't summarize the entire book.

While you're blowing your load thinking this is all 'they' have, I'm just throwing the popcorn in the microwave and pulling the book off the shelf. My prediction is in the end, there will be military tribunals... and that is why DJT surrounded himself with military brass. This has been long in the making.

Ah, more conspiracy theory. I stopped at the following nonsense. I want the FISA to come out to expose lying liberals. What a disgrace. Claim: -------- Third, understand that the CIA told the BBC in January '17 that the most controversial allegation in Steele's dossier—the allegation the Kremlin has blackmail material on Trump of a sexual nature—was true. This means the CIA had likely told the FBI the same many months before. What BBC said, again more nonsense: ------------------------------------------------ And the former MI6 agent is not the only source for the claim about Russian kompromat on the president-elect. Back in August, a retired spy told me he had been informed of its existence by "the head of an East European intelligence agency". Later, I used an intermediary to pass some questions to active duty CIA officers dealing with the case file - they would not speak to me directly. I got a message back that there was "more than one tape", "audio and video", on "more than one date", in "more than one place" - in the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow and also in St Petersburg - and that the material was "of a sexual nature".

Noon wrote:

Thorough debunking of the memo by Seth Abramson here:

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/959494066840002560/photo/1

The first lightning strike wrote:

Rigged for Trump. wrote:

Now, this recently released memo, which is incomplete and misleading, argues that the FBI is full of Hillary supporters and liberals, and has all along been engaged in a witch hunt against Trump. Really - how dumb would you have to be to buy into that crock?

A foreword in a book doesn't summarize the entire book.

While you're blowing your load thinking this is all 'they' have, I'm just throwing the popcorn in the microwave and pulling the book off the shelf. My prediction is in the end, there will be military tribunals... and that is why DJT surrounded himself with military brass. This has been long in the making.

A junta ain't happening. . . . Stop eating weed-laced popcorn. . . . You are hallucinating.

Now that we know the investigators leak to the media before handing evidence over to "collaborate" their research, I don't trust anything liberals say. Bunch of lairs. This people need to be prosecuted.

Rigged for Trump. wrote:

just enough to swing the election to Trump in the three "Blue Wall" states.

I hope history doesn't summarize it that way.

The Right got a bunch of mileage out of the ridiculous email story. But, Clinton was such a weak candidate that it was a factor.

2016 had huge turnout for third parties. Clinton had a terrible message that didn't work in battleground States. Obama didn't do a good job in placating poor Democrats. Trump used all the old, very effective fascist strategies whether he was aware of it or not.

its_baddude wrote:

Ah, more conspiracy theory. I stopped at the following nonsense. I want the FISA to come out to expose lying liberals. What a disgrace.

We are still waiting for your explanation how a diehard conservative, Strzok, who started the October Surprise revisiting Hillary's emails that got Trump elected, has magically become the Republican poster child as a diehard, Deep State, Hillary loving democrat.

RICO charges rumors? Please, I thought you liberals did not believe in conspiracy theories. I know this memo hurts your feelings. Take it like a man. Muller is investigating the wrong guys. He should be investigating all the colluding Democrats.

nontrumper wrote:

There seems to be a number of constitutional lawyers that do think a sitting president can be indicted, but not prosecuted. The indictments could be the basis for impeachment. I've heard rumblings that there are already sealed indictments for Trump (RICO charges).

It's going to be very rocky over the next few months, but I think we will learn A LOT about the direction of the investigation in the next few months. Although a lot has happened in the last 12 months, I think it's going to move very fast in the coming weeks.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Rigged for Trump. wrote:

just enough to swing the election to Trump in the three "Blue Wall" states.

I hope history doesn't summarize it that way.

The Right got a bunch of mileage out of the ridiculous email story. But, Clinton was such a weak candidate that it was a factor.

2016 had huge turnout for third parties. Clinton had a terrible message that didn't work in battleground States. Obama didn't do a good job in placating poor Democrats. Trump used all the old, very effective fascist strategies whether he was aware of it or not.

Hillary wasn't a weak candidate. She got a YUGE number of votes more than Trump. What killed her was Stein and Sanders splitting the vote for her, and, of course, the Russian bots. BTW—the #thereleasethememo campaign was boosted by Russian bots to make the supporters far greater than they were; and those supporters are a reason Trump felt he "had" to release the memo; his fans demanded it—never mind that his fans were mostly Russian bots working for Putin.