Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

AT&T beneifts by over $20 BILLION dollars with this tax cut...fine, but giving out little token bonuses doesn't really help the little man/woman.

And it especially doesn't help the thousands that have been laid off by AT&T in the last few months.

Also, nobody has mentioned that the tax cuts mean that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks.

If we're going to do tax cuts to benefit the wealthy, it should at least be for the AMERICAN wealthy.

Can you correlate the layoffs to the tax cuts?

Flagpole wrote:

Floggerville wrote:

Like when you bragged about making money in the Obummer years, but you complicitly looked away at his behavior.

Flagpole is wrong again.

No one is coming.

The clown Flagpole is proven wrong again.

What a sad little creature.

1) Obama will go down as one of our greatest Presidents. No need to be complicit with him.

2) I am right again.

3) Mueller is coming.

4) The clown is done.

Yeah, only in your mind little fat man! Ha, ha, haaa!!!! Oh sorry, it's all fake news, like the propaganda laced links that you provide.

Victory>>>ME

Defeat>>>YOU

Reasonable Republican wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

And it especially doesn't help the thousands that have been laid off by AT&T in the last few months.

Also, nobody has mentioned that the tax cuts mean that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks.

If we're going to do tax cuts to benefit the wealthy, it should at least be for the AMERICAN wealthy.

Can you correlate the layoffs to the tax cuts?

No, I can't. You definitely win that argument.

DiscoGary wrote:

Malik Shabazz wrote:

You are halarious. We're the idiots carrying the Home Depot torches on Friday night just there for a "pro-statue rally"?

Are you in the business of declaring people guilty before they commit a crime? Do you realize that your opinion of someone else does not give you the authority to beat them up?

Flagpole! You're the only one here showing any signs of sanity. Do YOU see the problem with beating up people just because you think they stand for something horrible?

Do you guys understand that once you unleash that monster, it will soon be at your door?

No friggin imagination. Just pure ignorance and hatred.

DG,

Violence is not right on either side. That is clear.

1) Slow your roll, brother...you are not understanding what I'm saying. Yes, a rising stock market in theory COULD help everyone, but we have to deal with what is. 53% of American workers are not invested in the stock market. It is a bit disingenuous from Trump to tout that so much (I mean, it's fair to mention once perhaps, but really silly to attach to the market as it could definitely drop during his term) because his base is not heavily invested in it. I am the biggest proponent of investing on this site, so I do believe that most of that is of their own doing and that they only have themselves to blame, but they ARE Trump supporters after all, and a rising stock market doesn't really help them. Just like when Trump kept talking about the Death Tax to his crowds and people went nuts that he wanted to end it...need $5 million as an individual or $11 million as a married couple to benefit from the ending of the Estate Tax (Death Tax).

2) Trump supporters are geeked about a handful of companies giving out $1,000-$2,000 to employees when that is such peanuts compared to what those companies gained from the tax cuts. A one-time small gesture like that does next to nothing.

3) I don't really have a "salary". I own my own business and make what I make. It's decent income, but making a ton of money has never been my goal. I'm happy for you and your "bonuses". Have fun working for someone else. I prefer not to do that. So, I don't rely on an employer to allow me to work for them like you do. Probably good for you not to be so nasty to someone in the future when you don't know their situation.

Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine PM?

A very stable genius! wrote:

Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine PM?

Stable. VERY stable. More stable than anyone you have ever met, I can tell you that!

Covfefely stable.

Really Smart Person wrote:

A very stable genius! wrote:

Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine PM?

Stable. VERY stable. More stable than anyone you have ever met, I can tell you that!

Covfefely stable.

Bigly stable?

Good stuff in Davos. Expect yuuuge investments and even more liberal whinging. Remember: the louder the libcucks, the more they're losing. Keep fighting a good economy until it's impossible to deny. Keep attributing everything to Obama and see how that plays out at the ballot box. Amazing, liberals still don't 'get it.'

kekistani wrote:

Good stuff in Davos. Expect yuuuge investments and even more liberal whinging. Remember: the louder the libcucks, the more they're losing. Keep fighting a good economy until it's impossible to deny. Keep attributing everything to Obama and see how that plays out at the ballot box. Amazing, liberals still don't 'get it.'

And just completely ignore the fact that ISIS has been decimated, exactly as Trump said it would be if he were elected.

Also ignore border crossings/arrests are way down, exactly as Trump said they would be if he were elected.

These are the things that get him re-elected in 2020.

Uhh, Trump won every income category over $50K, he won the suburbs, and he won white college graduates. His voters are plenty invested in the market, and are making out quite well. Man, you’re dense.

TheOP wrote:

L L wrote:

Yes, Trump delivered in helping the forgotten people - the wealthy.

What group has not benefited from a surge in the stock market? Why does it have to be bad if wealthy people get wealthier?

Because it leads to an asset bubble and a subsequent fall in demand for those assets. This combined with unsustainble levels of household debt means that sooner or later household spending will drop leading to less demand, job cuts and financial armageddon, AGAIN.

Posts like this remind me of the story about the man waiting for God to save him.

God Will Save Me

A terrible storm came into a town and local officials sent out an emergency warning that the riverbanks would soon overflow and flood the nearby homes. They ordered everyone in the town to evacuate immediately.

A faithful Christian man heard the warning and decided to stay, saying to himself, “I will trust God and if I am in danger, then God will send a divine miracle to save me.”

The neighbors came by his house and said to him, “We’re leaving and there is room for you in our car, please come with us!” But the man declined. “I have faith that God will save me.”

As the man stood on his porch watching the water rise up the steps, a man in a canoe paddled by and called to him, “Hurry and come into my canoe, the waters are rising quickly!” But the man again said, “No thanks, God will save me.”

The floodwaters rose higher pouring water into his living room and the man had to retreat to the second floor. A police motorboat came by and saw him at the window. “We will come up and rescue you!” they shouted. But the man refused, waving them off saying, “Use your time to save someone else! I have faith that God will save me!”

The flood waters rose higher and higher and the man had to climb up to his rooftop.

A helicopter spotted him and dropped a rope ladder. A rescue officer came down the ladder and pleaded with the man, "Grab my hand and I will pull you up!" But the man STILL refused, folding his arms tightly to his body. “No thank you! God will save me!”

Shortly after, the house broke up and the floodwaters swept the man away and he drowned.

When in Heaven, the man stood before God and asked, “I put all of my faith in You. Why didn’t You come and save me?”

And God said, “Son, I sent you a warning. I sent you a car. I sent you a canoe. I sent you a motorboat. I sent you a helicopter. What more were you looking for?”

Stock Market has risen 25-30% since his election. People like this poster say, "Well, I'm not invested, so it hasn't helped me."

Tax cuts lead to some companies to give workers $2000+ raises." People like this poster say, "Well, an extra $2000 doesn't help me because CEO's can spend that much on lunch and it's probably just a one time bonus."

Unemployment rate is down, more people have jobs, and average wages have increased." People like this poster say, "Well, I still can't find my perfect job that pays me what I think I'm worth, so it really doesn't help me."

What more were you looking for?

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Are you in the business of declaring people guilty before they commit a crime? Do you realize that your opinion of someone else does not give you the authority to beat them up?

Flagpole! You're the only one here showing any signs of sanity. Do YOU see the problem with beating up people just because you think they stand for something horrible?

Do you guys understand that once you unleash that monster, it will soon be at your door?

No friggin imagination. Just pure ignorance and hatred.

DG,

Violence is not right on either side. That is clear.

Wow, thanks for your approval. We weren't sure until you chimed in to verify it. You're amazingly bright!:):):):):):):):):):)

Reasonable Republican wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

And it especially doesn't help the thousands that have been laid off by AT&T in the last few months.

Also, nobody has mentioned that the tax cuts mean that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks.

If we're going to do tax cuts to benefit the wealthy, it should at least be for the AMERICAN wealthy.

Can you correlate the layoffs to the tax cuts?

Kimberley-Clark just said that it used savings from tax cuts to pay for a restructuring that includes huge layoffs. So there's that.

I notice you chose not to address the fact that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks. The tax bill means we are actually borrowing money to enrich foreign investors.

Fat hurts wrote:

Reasonable Republican wrote:

Can you correlate the layoffs to the tax cuts?

Kimberley-Clark just said that it used savings from tax cuts to pay for a restructuring that includes huge layoffs. So there's that.

I notice you chose not to address the fact that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks. The tax bill means we are actually borrowing money to enrich foreign investors.

Isn’t that what you globalists want? Why should only America benefit?

Fellow lefties, let's be clear about something. Lower unemployment is almost always a good thing.

We are the World wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Kimberley-Clark just said that it used savings from tax cuts to pay for a restructuring that includes huge layoffs. So there's that.

I notice you chose not to address the fact that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks. The tax bill means we are actually borrowing money to enrich foreign investors.

Isn’t that what you globalists want? Why should only America benefit?

Uh, no. Republicans are the globalists. They want the planet to be ruled by the super-rich worldwide elites. That's one reason Republicans don't care if Russian oligarchs meddled in our election.

That's also why none of you have stepped in to defend the fact that American taxpayers are borrowing billions to benefit wealthy foreigners who own US stocks. The tax bill means we are actually borrowing money to enrich foreign investors.

The tax bill is globalist legislation.

Fat hurts wrote:

Fellow lefties, let's be clear about something. Lower unemployment is almost always a good thing.

You’re right. It is ALMOST always.

The times when it it not a good thing is when a Republican is in the White House. Then it is a bad thing.