Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Please stop posting M.A.G.A, in all of your posts. It's not the point of the boards.

He did not. He initially said several things about the plan that were guaranteed, BEFORE he was elected. Then he changed everything afterwards.

What is wrong with you? Every recent president has done something similar. Every. Single. One.

Since we're using Trump logic now, none of it matters anyway because it was so long ago.

You guys need to find some new material.

Hey dipsh*t, you're ripping Trump on HealthCare, the Tax Cut Plan, ect...Obama did the same things and lied. What's wrong with you and why can you not see the obvious point? Your obnoxiously dimwitted. Again, Obama just did this crap less than a year ago and you never complained old man. But Trump....you whine like a little baby.

You need to seek the truth versus the garbage that you spew from reading your liberal trash? Obama was still the President less than one year ago, not "so long ago". With your logic, Trump won on November 8th, OVER a year ago... so stop talking about it, it's ancient news old man.

You guys need to get some true material.

This is a strange thing to single out for a lie. Anyone can see it's hyperbole.

You seem to be having trouble telling the difference betweens lies, spin, promises, bullsh^t and hyperbole, not to mention facts and fiction.

Well I'm convinced

No contradiction there

Pretty much described the entire thread.

its_baddude wrote:

Consider this scenario

-----------------------------

1) Business A has $ money left over.

2) Business A gives bonus $ to every employee

3) Employee decides to buy a widget

4) Widget factory expands to meet demand and hires more workers

5) More workers now need new widget and pay taxes

6) Tax revenues go up

7) Widget factory expands to meet demand again

8) Repeat.

Same principle as money in the bank.

It is not "simple logic" that all this will happen unless you rule out all other possible outcomes. Which you are far too lazy to do. That is actually taking quite a logical leap and making massive assumptions.

its_baddude wrote:

Consider this scenario

-----------------------------

1) Business A has $ money left over.

2) Business A gives bonus $ to every employee

3) Employee decides to buy a widget

4) Widget factory expands to meet demand and hires more workers

5) More workers now need new widget and pay taxes

6) Tax revenues go up

7) Widget factory expands to meet demand again

8) Repeat.

Same principle as money in the bank.

Nope.

1) Business A has $ money left over.

2) Business A buys back stock.

3) Stock prices rise.

4) Flagpole and other wealthy people invested in the stock market make money.

5) Flagpole and other wealthy people up their retirement living and/or leave more money to children.

6) Middle class and under get very little from this...some get a few extra pennies because the wealthy people buy more, but this trickle down theory doesn't really work in any significant way.

7) The end.

Enjoy the good read Liberals, you'll deny it anyways and try to take my wallet while I'm not looking.

REPUBLICAN VERSUS DEMOCRAT

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words, redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school.

Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't even have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.

Her father listened and then asked, 'How is your friend Audrey doing?' She replied, 'Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies, and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties and lots of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too hung over.'

Her wise father asked his daughter, 'Why don't you go to the Dean's office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.'

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired back, 'That's a crazy idea, how would that be fair! I've worked really hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!'

The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, 'Welcome to the conservative's philosophy.'

If anyone has a better explanation of the difference between a Republican and Democrat I'm all ears.

Jeez that was a terrible fable.

Redistribution of grades? Really?

Why not make the story where the daughter works every day for a pay check and her friend Audrey doesn't show up for work half the time and the woman's father says to give some of her pay to Audrey?

Then we can respond how Audrey was raped by the local district attorney and the town shut down Planned Parenthood and she had the baby which had medical issues which she couldn't get healthcare before because her pay was just above the medicaid threshold and Obamacare was repealed so there were no exchanges or subsidies to get affordable care so she turns tricks on the side for food and medicine.

This is a bogus premise, because both students here were actually already in college. That would be like having two children from different families getting a billion dollars each through inheritance and then one of them squandering it away while the other didn't...this is the fault of the person doing the squandering and not equivalent to the real world. The problem in the real world is that there are significant barriers for some people to getting into college to begin with...extreme poverty, fewer job opportunities in inner cities, and on and on and on.

You are also assuming that liberals want MORE government programs. That is actually NOT a plank of the Democrat's platform. Democrats don't stand up and say "we want more programs!" Democrats and Republicans typically differ on WHERE to spend money (military for Republicans and Health Care for children for Democrats as examples), and even though there has long been evidence that Republicans spend as much or more than Democrats, with this latest tax plan adding $1.5 trillion to the national debt, Republicans no longer get to say they are the party of fiscal conservatism.

Finally, let's not confuse traditional Republicanism and Conservatism with the load Trump is dishing out. Americans who are against Trump (68% at last poll) are so because he is a horrible human being and a criminal. He will face the music.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

NO, it's not a bogus premise. Your 68% poll is wrong. Fake News, as you like to call it. Still butthurt? Trump is doing a great job and things are finally coming together.

Mueller is coming alright, after the Democrats.

Trump is the Man!

L L wrote:

Jeez that was a terrible fable.

Redistribution of grades? Really?

Why not make the story where the daughter works every day for a pay check and her friend Audrey doesn't show up for work half the time and the woman's father says to give some of her pay to Audrey?

Then we can respond how Audrey was raped by the local district attorney and the town shut down Planned Parenthood and she had the baby which had medical issues which she couldn't get healthcare before because her pay was just above the medicaid threshold and Obamacare was repealed so there were no exchanges or subsidies to get affordable care so she turns tricks on the side for food and medicine.

Yep...his story was full of holes. I didn't even attempt to address all of them.

One of the many holes is that the professor filled the daughter's head with very liberal ideas. Well, that is another fallacy of the Right is that college means liberal. There are a TON of conservative colleges and Christian colleges in this country where the professors tout conservative ideals. Putting the idea out there that college students are brainwashed by liberal professors was a way for Republicans to try to diminish the educated and try to appeal to the uneducated. Was actually a brilliant strategy, but it simply is not based in truth. Want liberal? Go to a liberal college. Want conservative, go to almost ANY NAIA school or "Christian" Colleges or most colleges in Red states. There are easily as many options for a more conservative educational experience.

Woodsmann wrote:

NO, it's not a bogus premise. Your 68% poll is wrong. Fake News, as you like to call it. Still butthurt? Trump is doing a great job and things are finally coming together.

Mueller is coming alright, after the Democrats.

Trump is the Man!

1) Very wishful thinking.

2) I don't call anything "Fake News".

3) Trump is the worst president in American history, and that tax plan is less popular than he is even.

4) Mueller is coming...for Trump.

5) The clown is done.

I bet you were really upset when all of those black women came out to vote and prevent Roy Moore from becoming a US Senator.

It took four liberal Constitutional amendments to make that vote possible.

The US had to free the slaves, allow people of color to vote, allow women to vote and abolish any poll taxes in order to vote.

Plus lowering the voting age to 18 probably helped too.

Conservatives are trying to go back to them good ole days but that won't happen.

L L wrote:

I bet you were really upset when all of those black women came out to vote and prevent Roy Moore from becoming a US Senator.

It took four liberal Constitutional amendments to make that vote possible.

The US had to free the slaves, allow people of color to vote, allow women to vote and abolish any poll taxes in order to vote.

Plus lowering the voting age to 18 probably helped too.

Conservatives are trying to go back to them good ole days but that won't happen.

Nope, not in the least, wrong is wrong.

I'm not a racist, but you are.

Are you ready for the biggest shock? I'm an African American male and I live just north of Detroit, Michigan (Warren area). I went to College at Wayne State University and work out of a hospital called Beaumont.

Apparently you've just proven that you are a racist. I've been black all of my life and don't see things in color, but you've just proven that you do or why did you bring up race? Do you have nothing else to do but constantly accuse others of racism when the it's actually the man in the mirror? You are part of the problem.

I have relatives from a LONG time ago that were slaves, but I don't blame Caucasians living today for that. You brought up slavery, not me.

If you'd like to call me out, because all Republicans lie, then post your email. I can easily prove it. You share info first, then I'll share info, it's that easy.

Thank you, President Trump, for getting your Tax Bill passed! I will save about $2,000 in taxes. I can now ditch my 49" TV and buy a Samsung 75" Class - 4K Ultra HD, Smart, LED TV...plus some more video games. And as for those health, social and environmental programs which that money would have gone to...I say too bad deal with it.

You support a party that holds people back.

They would love to hold you up as a token gesture that they have black friends.

There are those with conservative values rooted in in tradition that are just fine.

But the party of American conservatism exploits the people that prop them up. Especially taking advantage of good religious people.

Woodsmann wrote:

Your 68% poll is wrong. Fake News, as you like to call it. Still butthurt? Trump is doing a great job and things are finally coming together.

Mueller is coming alright, after the Democrats.

Trump is the Man!

I thought Trump invented the term "fake news?"

As Trump's support continues to decline, the GOP will be faced with two options: impeach Trump or get killed in the 2018 mid-terms. Maybe not enough to give the Dems a majority, but it'll be a bloodbath. The problem for the GOP is there are members of Congress that will be swept up in Mueller's investigation and they will stall impeachment proceedings as long as they can. Nunes. Ryan. Rohrabacher. To name a few.

Mueller is coming after anyone (GOP or Dem or Independent) that broke the law as it relates to Trump-Russia. Country over party. It's going to be YUGE.

Hate to point it out, pal. But . . .

1) Nobody said anything about your race.

2) Your race is not a get out of jail card rendering it impossible for you to be racist (or wrong or just plain stupid).

Try to get a clue.

nontrumper wrote:

I thought Trump invented the term "fake news?"

As Trump's support continues to decline, the GOP will be faced with two options: impeach Trump or get killed in the 2018 mid-terms. Maybe not enough to give the Dems a majority, but it'll be a bloodbath. The problem for the GOP is there are members of Congress that will be swept up in Mueller's investigation and they will stall impeachment proceedings as long as they can. Nunes. Ryan. Rohrabacher. To name a few.

Mueller is coming after anyone (GOP or Dem or Independent) that broke the law as it relates to Trump-Russia. Country over party. It's going to be YUGE.

Why do you think Ryan will be swept up into Mueller's investigation?

PIO! wrote:

Hate to point it out, pal. But . . .

1) Nobody said anything about your race.

2) Your race is not a get out of jail card rendering it impossible for you to be racist (or wrong or just plain stupid).

Try to get a clue.

Oh, yeah, one more thing. Your story was indeed stupid (which suggests, but does not prove, that you are some combination of stupid and dishonest).

Wells Fargo hikes its hourly pay rate to $15 & will aim for $400M in philanthropic donations next year due to the newly-passed GOP tax bill.

See libs, you don’t have to demand $15/hour; companies will willingly pay it when the economy is thriving. What a concept. Or could it just be that a billionaire business mogul is better at economics than a community organizer?

M A G A !!!