Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

1) Yes you do read my posts, and you are reading this one right now. How would you have an opinion about them if you didn't?

2) Travelgate? Why would anyone talk about something that ended in 2000? Maybe we can talk about the Moon Landing too? Also, neither Clinton is the President.

3) I say many things about Trump that can't be said about Obama and both Clintons. Trump said he grabbed women by the p*ssy. He said "Two Corinthians". He said he was going to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. He said repealing and replacing Obamacare would be "so easy". I could go on for days here.

4) No one here ever said Obama never told a lie or never said something that turned out not to happen. That is par for the course with Presidents. NO ONE compares to Trump though in that arena, and it is ridiculous for you to insinuate so.

5) It doesn't matter that Trump won. Nixon won too. Those of us who are concerned about Trump are concerned about what he has done in office and under whose influence he is likely under. He hasn't done a major thing he said he would do yet (which to me is a good thing, but for those who voted for him, you should be pissed), and he's almost a year in. There is far more movement on the investigation against him and his administration (and that didn't start right away) than there is on anything big he promised to do.

You have the bottom line wrong. The bottom line is that his presidency will end in disgrace. Mueller is coming...tick, tick, tick.

Wrong>Rigged for Trump Guy wrote:

Obama lied about his stance on gays,

Wait....what?

hofstrau wrote:

Wrong>Rigged for Trump Guy wrote:

Obama lied about his stance on gays,

Wait....what?

Yeah this one of those birther type white lies.. why not throw anything in there right, the morons who fall for that have their heads so far up their a$$es it doesn't matter what they are fed.

It's funny how every big tax cut is touted as a tax cut for the middle class. If they wanted to help the middle class why not just pass a simple tax cut reducing taxes by 10% on those earning between $30k and $150k. You know - the middle class.

Too complicated, I guess. Somehow targeting 90% of the tax reductions for businesses and the rich must be better for the middle class.

Middle Class Tax Cuts wrote:

It's funny how every big tax cut is touted as a tax cut for the middle class. If they wanted to help the middle class why not just pass a simple tax cut reducing taxes by 10% on those earning between $30k and $150k. You know - the middle class.

Too complicated, I guess. Somehow targeting 90% of the tax reductions for businesses and the rich must be better for the middle class.

God that makes much sense. +1

Conundrum wrote:

Middle Class Tax Cuts wrote:

It's funny how every big tax cut is touted as a tax cut for the middle class. If they wanted to help the middle class why not just pass a simple tax cut reducing taxes by 10% on those earning between $30k and $150k. You know - the middle class.

Too complicated, I guess. Somehow targeting 90% of the tax reductions for businesses and the rich must be better for the middle class.

God that makes much sense. +1

It's called trickle down theory. You don't remember the glory days of the 80s?

Ok, I'm here to help you out. Please stop posting leftist propaganda. The tax plan is still being worked. The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income). The tax cuts are constrained by the filibuster rule. So the republicans have to play games. This explains most of the issues and the weird numbers. Any other questions that I can help answer. You can google for left rag opinion and right opinions if you want to see the current breakdown.

Conundrum wrote:

Middle Class Tax Cuts wrote:

It's funny how every big tax cut is touted as a tax cut for the middle class. If they wanted to help the middle class why not just pass a simple tax cut reducing taxes by 10% on those earning between $30k and $150k. You know - the middle class.

Too complicated, I guess. Somehow targeting 90% of the tax reductions for businesses and the rich must be better for the middle class.

God that makes much sense. +1

its_baddude wrote:

Ok, I'm here to help you out. Please stop posting leftist propaganda. The tax plan is still being worked. The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

The tax cuts are constrained by the filibuster rule. So the republicans have to play games. This explains most of the issues and the weird numbers.

Any other questions that I can help answer.

You can google for left rag opinion and right opinions if you want to see the current breakdown.

Conundrum wrote:

God that makes much sense. +1

How is saying "reducing taxes on the middle class will help the middle class" leftist propaganda?

Count Chocula wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

Ok, I'm here to help you out. Please stop posting leftist propaganda. The tax plan is still being worked. The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

The tax cuts are constrained by the filibuster rule. So the republicans have to play games. This explains most of the issues and the weird numbers.

Any other questions that I can help answer.

You can google for left rag opinion and right opinions if you want to see the current breakdown.

How is saying "reducing taxes on the middle class will help the middle class" leftist propaganda?

This ^

its_baddude wrote:

The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

The tax cuts are constrained by the filibuster rule. So the republicans have to play games.

Conundrum wrote:

God that makes much sense. +1

Who would filibuster a tax cut mostly for the middle class?

Hopefully will trickle down??

How about increasing demand by more money to the middle class, prompting increased business/services to meet the increased demand.

Hopefully things will trickle up. That would be a nice perspective for a change.

Campaign big time Donor wrote:

Finally my investment looks like it will pay off. We told the politicians to do this or else they get cut off.

Tax cut for the middle class,....well a little temporary small one, but make no mistake this tax break has been driven by us and is for us.

Middle class tax break?............. hahahaha

The donor class will do VERY WELL thank you.

Yes.

They are getting rid of the estate taxes. That's the taxes on money over 11 million dollar that you received from inheritance from ( say your parents). That will be a boon to the middle class.

Yet they are going to tax scholarship money that you receive to pay for your tuition. (those dam rich college kids)

That seems fair, right?

Some middle class tax plan.

Conundrum wrote:

Campaign big time Donor wrote:

Finally my investment looks like it will pay off. We told the politicians to do this or else they get cut off.

Tax cut for the middle class,....well a little temporary small one, but make no mistake this tax break has been driven by us and is for us.

Middle class tax break?............. hahahaha

The donor class will do VERY WELL thank you.

Yes.

They are getting rid of the estate taxes. That's the taxes on money over 11 million dollar that you received from inheritance from ( say your parents). That will be a boon to the middle class.

Yet they are going to tax scholarship money that you receive to pay for your tuition. (those dam rich college kids)

That seems fair, right?

Some middle class tax plan.

Better than Obama's crap plan and we didn't hear you complaining then Libby. He lied more times than you'd have the guts to admit on your best day, but...you supported him and his bias against whites---there's your racist and you supported him. Proud much?

its_baddude wrote:

The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

The democrats will oppose anything the republicans put up. Due to politics, they will say that republicans want to raise taxes on the poor and lower taxes on the rich. You can look up the history of the democrats for last few decades. Same old sh*t. Using simple logic will tell you that the extra money business will have will have to go somewhere. Thinks will trickle down. Is this too complicated for you?

Conundrum wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

The tax cuts are constrained by the filibuster rule. So the republicans have to play games.

Who would filibuster a tax cut mostly for the middle class?

Hopefully will trickle down??

How about increasing demand by more money to the middle class, prompting increased business/services to meet the increased demand.

Hopefully things will trickle up. That would be a nice perspective for a change.

Ok, you quote a left wing rag and give a few example of companies that may not invest their money. So what, how about the other 1.7 millions corporations in the US. Are you claiming that none will reinvest their money into something? What is you point?

Jeff Wigand wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/15/16653698/ceos-investment-tax-reform

Here is what the left wing rag said about a Trump presidency. Do you put this rag in high regards?https://www.vox.com/new-money/2016/11/10/13575342/president-trump-disaster-wall-street

Jeff Wigand wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

The biggest cut will be corporate taxes. Hopefully, that will trickle down in the forms of more jobs (less welfare) and higher wages (more income).

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/15/16653698/ceos-investment-tax-reform

its_baddude wrote:

The democrats will oppose anything the republicans put up. Due to politics, they will say that republicans want to raise taxes on the poor and lower taxes on the rich.

You can look up the history of the democrats for last few decades. Same old sh*t.

Using simple logic will tell you that the extra money business will have will have to go somewhere. Thinks will trickle down.

Is this too complicated for you?

Conundrum wrote:

Who would filibuster a tax cut mostly for the middle class?

Hopefully will trickle down??

How about increasing demand by more money to the middle class, prompting increased business/services to meet the increased demand.

Hopefully things will trickle up. That would be a nice perspective for a change.

So, you're saying that giving the bulk of the tax cuts to companies and wealthy people will benefit middle class folks more than giving all of the tax cuts to middle class folks? Okaayyyyyyy . . .

its_baddude wrote:

Here is what the left wing rag said about a Trump presidency. Do you put this rag in high regards?

https://www.vox.com/new-money/2016/11/10/13575342/president-trump-disaster-wall-street

Jeff Wigand wrote:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/15/16653698/ceos-investment-tax-reform

This is stupid. I never heard ANY economists say Trump would drive the market down. To the contrary.

The only negative the "market" expects is long term deregulation issues a la the housing market collapse.

Way to propose a straw argument

its_baddude wrote:

The democrats will oppose anything the republicans put up. Due to politics, they will say that republicans want to raise taxes on the poor and lower taxes on the rich.

You can look up the history of the democrats for last few decades. Same old sh*t.

Using simple logic will tell you that the extra money business will have will have to go somewhere. Thinks will trickle down.

Is this too complicated for you?

Conundrum wrote:

Who would filibuster a tax cut mostly for the middle class?

Hopefully will trickle down??

How about increasing demand by more money to the middle class, prompting increased business/services to meet the increased demand.

Hopefully things will trickle up. That would be a nice perspective for a change.

There ya go Conundrum, Liberal Judge in the sanctuary city lets illegal go free after killing a lady 2 years ago as she walked on a pier. No, he wasn't shooting at a seal. And look at his past! Yours is probably pretty bad, but his is horrendous. Oh, but that's just one example. That was somebody's daughter dammit! Just keep letting them in, right oh bright one?