Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

itsbaddude wrote:

Here is the story. I recommend you go incognito so that you bypass the viewing limits and ads.

Fat Hurts, as usual, introduced biased words to make it appear worse than what he actually said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/us/politics/trump-interview-sessions-russia.html

whenwherelink wrote:

When? Where? Link?

Thanks, dude.

itsbaddude wrote:

Here is the story. I recommend you go incognito so that you bypass the viewing limits and ads.

Fat Hurts, as usual, introduced biased words to make it appear worse than what he actually said.

- - - NYTimes Interview - - -

Why would Trump be giving an interview with an organization that he dubs "Fake News"?

Seems like either they are fake news in which case you don't give them the time of day. Or they are not fake news in which case you stop calling them fake news.

this is great, great news for the forces of law and order. Republicans should be happy. Mueller is looking into Trump's business transactions. That way he can be cleared of suspicion or found guilty of financial crimes.

You're all happy about this, right, law enforcement fans?

But seriously, this is a major step toward the downfall of the house of trump. He's somehow had a free pass for decades, but no more.

FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-20/mueller-is-said-to-expand-probe-to-trump-business-transactions?cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

has anyone pointed out that Trump threw sessions under the bus yesterday? Trump said hiring Sessions was a mistake and that Trump is unhappy with Sessions.

Mostly because sessions followed norms and recused himself.

Trump asks for loyalty, but shows none. You play with trump, you will get burned and cast aside.

Happens over and over again. People will not want to work for this guy in the WH.

Yep, just as happy as you were when Hillary and Bill lied to the nth degree about Haiti, emails, their Foundation, Bosnia, ETC....the list could go on and on. The Clintons got away with much more than Trump ever will.

Are YOU happy about that?

It's fun reading your posts. It's like a clueless 8th grader is writing it and actually thinks he's right. Hilarious!!!!!!

If the Clintons can get away with what they both did, Trump will still be President. Again, it's funny that you're dumb enough to believe he'll be out as President. You were last in line when brains were handed out.

Wow, the Democrats missed this post by the other side. The response will be, fake news--look over here at Trump---my dog ate my homework---unbelievable are the lefties:)

itsbaddude wrote:

More corruption from the democrats. It is funny the leftist accuse the republicans of the things they do. It never fails, whatever they accuse a republican of doing they do 100x worse.

To hot to handle! If you ever want to see a lying democrat caught in the act, checkout his denials of his shares in this company.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/19/putin-funded-company-john-podesta-received-75000-shares-collapsed/

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz-snore-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzequals the desperate democrats.

eric a blair wrote:

has anyone pointed out that Trump threw sessions under the bus yesterday? Trump said hiring Sessions was a mistake and that Trump is unhappy with Sessions.

Mostly because sessions followed norms and recused himself.

Trump asks for loyalty, but shows none. You play with trump, you will get burned and cast aside.

Happens over and over again. People will not want to work for this guy in the WH.

Seriously? You are telling me the Right is some bastion of truth and reason?The most disappointing thing is the ease with which voters have been divided. There are lots of things where it would be possible to agree and build a more robust Democracy despite some differences.I still don't understand why the fetish with the Clintons lives on. It's all irrelevant now.

Clinton Queen Corruption wrote:

Clinton is Corruption, period. She'd say anything to get elected and it still didn't help her. Lying loser.

Bush the Shrub wrote:

What are proven facts are: Bush the Shrub had 22 million emails erased using a private server for himself and his staff. He had millions killed in Iraq and Afghanistan; including uncountable women, children and old people. He allowed thousands of Heroes to die during 9/11, 2002.

eric a blair wrote:

has anyone pointed out that Trump threw sessions under the bus yesterday? Trump said hiring Sessions was a mistake and that Trump is unhappy with Sessions.

Mostly because sessions followed norms and recused himself.

Trump asks for loyalty, but shows none. You play with trump, you will get burned and cast aside.

Happens over and over again. People will not want to work for this guy in the WH.

Trump is vile and has been for decades; NONE of this should be news to anyone who read Wayne Barrett's ** 1992 ** biography of Trump btw... which the NYT didn't even review. (I wonder why?)

Re: Sessions, one thing to keep in mind is Trump's idiocy & monomania i.e. business let's a $hitheel like Sessions run amok...

Look at his recent posturing on asset forfeiture, which any "conservative" (and true liberal) should be aghast at.

Which is to say Sessions and these other cretins put up with T because he's a paper tiger who in fact allows them / is obvlivious to their malevolent scheming.

It's not irrelevant BOZO, are you that underdeveloped upstairs? Hillary is a crook. She would have been President had she won. She would be lying to a level that would make Trump look like a saint. So then, when you rip Trump, your girl would have been worse. Why in the hell can't you understand that? Democrats are truly dense.

the Clintons are vile pieces of garbage, always has been. go back as many years as you'd like, you'll find out the same thing knucklehead. wake up dumbo.

eric a blair wrote:

or rather, 'you think firing someone he has the legal right to fire would change anything?'

I've got money laundering on the brain.

Yes, I'm talking about firing Mueller. By Watergate's precedent, that should be something that triggers impeachment.

My interest is in proven cases of in-person voter fraud by illegal immigrants. Give me names and specific cases. I'm not interested in videos.

itsbaddude wrote:

I know you are interested in this. 1100 cases of proven voter fraud. You wanted at least one, here is more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHVK_ftiwhc&feature=youtu.be&t=1h59m13s

Can I just ask one healthcare question please.

Trump and the Republicans campaigned on reducing premiums, improving coverage, not touching Medicaid.

Their plans wouldn't do any of these things, but pursue an ideological course that government shouldn't be as involved in healthcare.

So were Trump and the Republicans lying to voters before the election, or are they lying about their plans now, or is it both?

Both and they are doing a terrible job at it, so it's a dead end issue for them. I'm glad they wasted precious political capital on this, the pendulum is going to swing to the left much faster than anyone can anticipate. We will see a reduced GOP footprint in the next midterms.

Richmond Runner wrote:

Can I just ask one healthcare question please.

Trump and the Republicans campaigned on reducing premiums, improving coverage, not touching Medicaid.

Their plans wouldn't do any of these things, but pursue an ideological course that government shouldn't be as involved in healthcare.

So were Trump and the Republicans lying to voters before the election, or are they lying about their plans now, or is it both?

free brain cells handouts wrote:

It's not irrelevant BOZO, are you that underdeveloped upstairs? Hillary is a crook. She would have been President had she won. She would be lying to a level that would make Trump look like a saint. So then, when you rip Trump, your girl would have been worse. Why in the hell can't you understand that? Democrats are truly dense.

Hillary is not in power and she is not running for office. That makes her irrelevant.

You seem to wish Hillary had won just so your rants would make sense.

Richmond Runner wrote:

Can I just ask one healthcare question please.

Trump and the Republicans campaigned on reducing premiums, improving coverage, not touching Medicaid.

Their plans wouldn't do any of these things, but pursue an ideological course that government shouldn't be as involved in healthcare.

So were Trump and the Republicans lying to voters before the election, or are they lying about their plans now, or is it both?

I believe some premiums would go down - young healthy people would have been able buy paper thin policies that were very cheap.

And then the right wingers believe market competition would have brought down prices overall.

improving coverage - again, they figured that competition and less regulated insurance policies would have eventually made more people insured.

Medicaid - Pence apparently told lawmakers that the proposed cuts would be amended in later years. They figured they needed to cut the costs now on paper, but let later congresses restore the funds.

You know, after the trump econopmy grows at 5%, creating budget surpluses to spend.

So I think you misunderstand what the right wingers wanted/planned.

Arse in da house wrote:

the Clintons are vile pieces of garbage, always has been. go back as many years as you'd like, you'll find out the same thing knucklehead. wake up dumbo.

Arse Schlesinger Jr wrote:

Trump is vile and has been for decades; NONE of this should be news to anyone who read Wayne Barrett's ** 1992 ** biography of Trump btw... which the NYT didn't even review. (I wonder why?)

Re: Sessions, one thing to keep in mind is Trump's idiocy & monomania i.e. business let's a $hitheel like Sessions run amok...

Look at his recent posturing on asset forfeiture, which any "conservative" (and true liberal) should be aghast at.

Which is to say Sessions and these other cretins put up with T because he's a paper tiger who in fact allows them / is obvlivious to their malevolent scheming.

Take Trump's c*ck out of your mouth and tell us what role the Clintons play in the present day government?

I never liked them, btw-- not when they Donald were friends either but that isn't the issue in Washington today, is it?

Fat hurts wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

or rather, 'you think firing someone he has the legal right to fire would change anything?'

I've got money laundering on the brain.

Yes, I'm talking about firing Mueller. By Watergate's precedent, that should be something that triggers impeachment.

Wrong. Nixon was never impeached, but Slick Willy was.