RUSSIA!!!
RUSSIA!!!
eric a blair wrote:
well that was depressing. Handel is likely to win by 2%.
Dems need a win somewhere. I understand that coming close in a heavily repub district means that dozens of seats will flip in midterms, but this is depressing and morale sucking.
Um since when is 2% close he was favoured to win...
You corporate dems just don't get it the only way we are ever going to beat trump is with a democratic socialist (Bernie candidate). The days of the corporate dems are over agip the progressive movement has just begun!
Tell me why cant those in the Democratic Party see that we have to move way to the left to beat trump?
Democratic socialist wrote:
eric a blair wrote:well that was depressing. Handel is likely to win by 2%.
Dems need a win somewhere. I understand that coming close in a heavily repub district means that dozens of seats will flip in midterms, but this is depressing and morale sucking.
Um since when is 2% close he was favoured to win...
You corporate dems just don't get it the only way we are ever going to beat trump is with a democratic socialist (Bernie candidate). The days of the corporate dems are over agip the progressive movement has just begun!
Tell me why cant those in the Democratic Party see that we have to move way to the left to beat trump?
Ossoff was never favored to win. This is a deep red district.
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:
L L wrote:I'd like to see some of the LRC Republicans come here and talk policy again.
I miss Disco Gary posts.
At least he would write out mostly lucid ideas about policy based on his ideals.
Any recent pro Trump posts have had no policy talking points at all.
What specifics would you guys like to see passed now that you have majority control and the votes to pass your policies?
Here is some policy talk libbbtwat. I like President Trumps policy of keeping his hands off my guns and not trying to enslave me. Great PoliciesðŸ‘
It is true that Republicans are in favor of the mentally ill being able to get all the guns they want.
Like the Virginia Tech shooter and you.
Yes, almost as bad as both Clintons you messed up freebie Demidiot!!!!!
yes he is squirming wrote:
Too long for Trump supporters to read so I will simplify:
YOUR MAN LIES TO YOU CONSTANTLY!
You are the most unhinged poster on this thread. Energized to take action against Trump? That is utterly laughable dumb pole. Would you like to make a wager on it as I'll gladly bet that he'll still be President in 4 years. Your buddies, the Clintons and Obama did way worse than anything Trump has done but your undersized yet over-biased brain can't figure it out. Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick...the sound of your guarantee that Trump wouldn't win, NO Way ever you said, but you were wrong. Now you're trying to justify it on a running forum and you've got less steam than Thomas the Train. Get a clue dude, he's not going anywhere, period. Maybe you'll get your FREE stuff in 4 years, maybe not, but it won't be less than that. Are you mad because you had to turn in your Obama Phone??? Is that what your hostility is really about???
"Dems now 0-4 in all their "referendum" special elections, but hey there's a bright side...they tell me they're 4-4 in moral victories." - Donald Trump Jr.
True
Yes, he was favored because they put $50 million into the election to almost guarantee it, the most expensive ever for that position. Get a clue FAT HEAD, Ossoff LOST and was suppose to win.
Fat hurts wrote:
Democratic socialist wrote:Um since when is 2% close he was favoured to win...
You corporate dems just don't get it the only way we are ever going to beat trump is with a democratic socialist (Bernie candidate). The days of the corporate dems are over agip the progressive movement has just begun!
Tell me why cant those in the Democratic Party see that we have to move way to the left to beat trump?
Ossoff was never favored to win. This is a deep red district.
ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!! U don't understand anything Spanky!!!!!!! Go back and cry on your boyfriend's shoulder, he'll listen to your whining.
eric a blair wrote:
well that was depressing. Handel is likely to win by 2%.
Dems need a win somewhere. I understand that coming close in a heavily repub district means that dozens of seats will flip in midterms, but this is depressing and morale sucking.
L L wrote:
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:Here is some policy talk libbbtwat. I like President Trumps policy of keeping his hands off my guns and not trying to enslave me. Great PoliciesðŸ‘
It is true that Republicans are in favor of the mentally ill being able to get all the guns they want.
Like the Virginia Tech shooter and you.
You are the one who is "triggered" Libbbtwat😆
You will never disarm nor enslave We The People you piece of 💩â—ï¸ðŸ˜‚😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How you like that POLICYâ—ï¸ðŸ˜†
The System wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:The easily triggered troll cuck liberal lashes out. Typical.
0/10
Take your meds, we don't need another lib shooting members of Congress.
flagpoling wrote:
"Dems now 0-4 in all their "referendum" special elections, but hey there's a bright side...they tell me they're 4-4 in moral victories." - Donald Trump Jr.
True
What is true is that repubtards fail to grasp WHY those special elections were being held. Republicans held the seats and signed on with the orange devil; meaning they had to give up their seats.
Now move along little 'tards.
exthrower wrote:
flagpoling wrote:"Dems now 0-4 in all their "referendum" special elections, but hey there's a bright side...they tell me they're 4-4 in moral victories." - Donald Trump Jr.
True
America has 'kicked them to the curb again'....exactly where they belong...
Libbbtwats are 💩 That need to be flushed down the 🚽.
And libbbtwats are circling the bowl😆
And no check to disarm extreme radical Muslims in the US either.
Hey Dems!
Just dropping by to congratulate you on your continued winning tonight!!
lolololololololol
L L wrote:
And no check to disarm extreme radical Muslims in the US either.
You are a racist misogynist twat. And you know it😆
They??? Republican PACs sank $18.2M into Handel. Dem PACS sank $7.6M.In terms of donations Repubs gave $4.5M to Handel while Dems gave $23.6M to Ossoff. So, Handel was ONLY able to save a seat Repubs have held SINCE 1979 by Republican PACs bailing her out. What the above numbers also tell you is that Republican voters are not donating to help Republicans win seats. The PACs have to cover the gap.
U B Wrong Boy wrote:
Yes, he was favored because they put $50 million into the election to almost guarantee it, the most expensive ever for that position. Get a clue FAT HEAD, Ossoff LOST and was suppose to win.
Fat hurts wrote:Ossoff was never favored to win. This is a deep red district.
U B Wrong Boy wrote:
Yes, he was favored because they put $50 million into the election to almost guarantee it, the most expensive ever for that position. Get a clue FAT HEAD, Ossoff LOST and was suppose to win.
Republicans vote for Republicans no matter how much you spend. I've been saying for weeks that Handel would win. Look back at my posts. There simply aren't enough Democrats in the 6th district for Ossoff to win it.
Referendum wrote:
flagpoling wrote:"Dems now 0-4 in all their "referendum" special elections, but hey there's a bright side...they tell me they're 4-4 in moral victories." - Donald Trump Jr.
True
What is true is that repubtards fail to grasp WHY those special elections were being held. Republicans held the seats and signed on with the orange devil; meaning they had to give up their seats.
Now move along little 'tards.
So what? You still lost!!!!!
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon