Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Forseriousrightnow? wrote:

please do wrote:

Trump encouraged the Russians to hack the elections...on national TV. This shouldn't surprise anyone.

"But her emails..." is a tired, weak, lame, disproved deflection.

Being told - by Comey himself in from of Congress - that HRC should not have been working on a private server, mishandled classified info, acted extremely carelessly, and was also "not able to find 33,000 emails" is not "disproving" anything. It actually totally PROVES it.

The problem was James Comey - old friend of the Clintons - decided to invoke whether or not she "intended to break the law", and then knowing Lynch would not allow her to be indicted anyhow, he let her off the hook. It was a shameful display of hypocrisy.

absurd

lynch recused herself. Said anything comey said, she would go along with.

you are ignorant or a liar. Maybe both, since you are a trumper.

I don't read all the crap you right-wing, nationalistic, xenophobics spew here non-stop, but just to keep things straight, today we have:

Trump threatening to fire Mueller, just like he fired Comey, because his ties to Russia are going to be exposed.

Sessions threatening to ban medical mj so he can further enrichen pharmas and worsen the nation's oxy/heroin epidemic.

So in other words, work to make us just like Russia only with Oxy taking over for vodka, is proceeding nicely.

Tucan Play wrote:

Mockerage wrote:

Let's not forget - let's NOT forget - that in 2012 Obama and Hillary mocked Romney for saying Russia was our #1 geopolitical foe. And now, apparently Russia is our #1 geopolitical foe. Idiots.

Let's not forget - let's NOT forget - that in 2012 Republicans were uniformly convinced that Russia was our #1 geopolitical foe. And now, apparently, they have an admirable leader with whom we should try to build a constructive relationship with. This is only months after said leader blatantly interfered in our election process. Idiots.

No, no, see, you're too dumb to play here.

Having a geopolitical foe does not mean you go to war with them. What's that saying about friends and enemies again?

And stop acting like countries don't interfere in other's elections. The US does it all the time. Obama flat out went on French television and told the population who they should vote for. Can you imagine if Putin bought air time here in the US?!

Trump rcp approval down to another new low: 38.6

If the Repubs look at the industry standard Gallup, they are facing a 36.0.

Haven't seen this kind of number since the last Repub president. You boys and girls sure know how to pick them.

Mockerage wrote:

Let's not forget - let's NOT forget - that in 2012 Obama and Hillary mocked Romney for saying Russia was our #1 geopolitical foe. And now, apparently Russia is our #1 geopolitical foe. Idiots.

You'd be hard pressed to find many people other than Romney who thought that at the time.

Maybe he was really smart or maybe he was just lucky. But politically, it was a dumb thing for Romney to say.

I can now fully appreciate and admit that Romney was probably correct.

Putin doesn't need to buy airtime in the US. He already has Trump as a mouthpiece.

Maybe, bruh, maybe. But, the continued strong support of reputards of Trump will directly result in most cuckservatives in congress to continue to suppport the cheeto Jesus despite his ridiculous shenanigans. Until those poll numbers for reputards re: Trump drop to 50-60% I don't think much will change bruh. Do not underestimate the emphasis the God Squad wing of the reputards put on abortion (and thus the SCOTUS). They will seriously vote 100% against their own interests on that issue alone.

totally normal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/trump-russia/?utm_term=.5777c8511780

I've dominated you again. What a cuck. Don't stroke out!

Oh, what a coincidence, my old handle was suddenly registered by someone else. A crying liberal stole my elopgalF handle, I'm so hurt:):):):):):)Yes, please show us the video of Trump busing them in. Oh wait, you can't you liberal liar. It was Hillary who was busing them in and the video was all of the news, even MSNBC covered it!!!!! Don't talk about the illegal voters in California and Florida, yet she still lost Florida...HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA!!!!!!!!!! It's great to see how much it bothers you "give me stuff for free people" that he won and she lost, that is hilarious. Then Flagpole says that they didn't rig the votes, just the advertising etc...to sway people...HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA!!!!!!!! Talk about a load of crap. He couldn't provide one piece of actual proof of anything that swayed people to vote for Trump and away from Hillary, not one thing. Boy, that must be embarrassing for him.

Lies and Vanpools wrote:

Eric a blair wrote:

TRump won by 100k votes. That's nothing. You honestly don't think his utter collapse in support among independents wouldn't wipe out those 100k votes?

Those 100k came entirely from lies Trump followers driving old people, also Amish, to the polls to vote. Recall that Trump whined about "they are busing them in." All along Trump's people were the ones "busing them in." Trump projecting as he always does.

The Sessions "Open Session" is another waste of time and resources. Another nothingburger with a tall glass of liberal tears. Of course, Democrats will try to spin it and claim some sort of victory - losing even further.

Forseriousrightnow? wrote:

please do wrote:

Trump encouraged the Russians to hack the elections...on national TV. This shouldn't surprise anyone.

"But her emails..." is a tired, weak, lame, disproved deflection.

Being told - by Comey himself in from of Congress - that HRC should not have been working on a private server, mishandled classified info, acted extremely carelessly, and was also "not able to find 33,000 emails" is not "disproving" anything. It actually totally PROVES it.

The problem was James Comey - old friend of the Clintons - decided to invoke whether or not she "intended to break the law", and then knowing Lynch would not allow her to be indicted anyhow, he let her off the hook. It was a shameful display of hypocrisy.

Sessions just referenced this disgraceful decision.

Contempt. Of. Congress. Right out in the open. Lock this elf up.

1ndependent wrote:

The Sessions "Open Session" is another waste of time and resources. Another nothingburger with a tall glass of liberal tears. Of course, Democrats will try to spin it and claim some sort of victory - losing even further.

huh?

Sessions himself thanked the senators for the opportunity to help sort out the russian influence on the election. Sessions said clearly the russians influenced the elections and that the investigations should thoroughly get to the bottom of it.

You are saying there should be no investigation?

What's your thinking?

eric a blair wrote:

huh?

Sessions himself thanked the senators for the opportunity to help sort out the russian influence on the election. Sessions said clearly the russians influenced the elections and that the investigations should thoroughly get to the bottom of it.

You are saying there should be no investigation?

What's your thinking?

Just another opportunity for partisans to get Sessions "on the record" saying something that the liberal propaganda machine can then run with ad-nauseam until some other Russian 'revelation' inevitably comes to bear through NYT, WashPost, CNN, etc.

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

Contempt. Of. Congress. Right out in the open. Lock this elf up.

this will be a major takeaway - the sessions is not answering questions...but trump is not asserting exec priveledge.

I think that is inappropriate. Sessions is not a personal atty for trump - he is the chief law enforcement officer. It's not his job to protect trump.

1ndependent wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

huh?

Sessions himself thanked the senators for the opportunity to help sort out the russian influence on the election. Sessions said clearly the russians influenced the elections and that the investigations should thoroughly get to the bottom of it.

You are saying there should be no investigation?

What's your thinking?

Just another opportunity for partisans to get Sessions "on the record" saying something that the liberal propaganda machine can then run with ad-nauseam until some other Russian 'revelation' inevitably comes to bear through NYT, WashPost, CNN, etc.

ok well you are on your own here - you are going against Sessions and the Republican members of the senate intel committee. They all think this hearing is necessary. You...don't.

eric a blair wrote:

ok well you are on your own here - you are going against Sessions and the Republican members of the senate intel committee. They all think this hearing is necessary. You...don't.

No I'm not, plenty - millions - of people feel the way I do. Did you NOT hear what Sessions and Senator Cotton just said?? You're so blinded by your need to find something, you can't see straight.

1ndependent wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

ok well you are on your own here - you are going against Sessions and the Republican members of the senate intel committee. They all think this hearing is necessary. You...don't.

No I'm not, plenty - millions - of people feel the way I do. Did you NOT hear what Sessions and Senator Cotton just said?? You're so blinded by your need to find something, you can't see straight.

did you not hear what Sessions himself said? Here, I'll post it for you. So you can see that you are weirdly not interested in defending American democracy. Why that is, I don't know. Maybe you know.

ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS: Thank you very much, Chairman Burr and ranking member Warner for allowing me to publicly appear before your committee today. I appreciate the committee's critically important efforts to investigate Russian interference with our democratic processes.

Such interference can never be tolerated and I encourage every effort to get to the bottom of any such allegations. As you know, the Deputy Attorney General has appointed a special counsel to investigate the matters related to the Russian interference in the 2016 election. I'm here today to address several issues that have been specifically raised before this committee. And I appreciate the opportunity to respond to questions as fully as the Lord enables me to do so