give us the facts wrote:
eric a blair wrote:So sorry...the FBI, republicans in the house, republicans in the senate, the NSA and other groups have chosen not to share their evidence with me. As soon as they do, I'll answer your question.
Just like I thought. You don't even have reasonable suspicion to back your demands. Well then, little boy, you cannot have any investigation either. No crime, no reasonable suspicion = no cake for you, kid.
Sorry if this goes way over your head.
eh? Sure I have reasonable suspicion. First of all, if republicans in the house and republicans in the senate are investigating the president and his people, that's pretty much all I need. Investigatinng your own party is difficult to do, so that's a pretty good clue that people in the know have seen some nasty stuff.
Same with the FBI. Same with the NSA. That they have very large investigations going on tells us that this is not fake news. They can't share thier evidence during an investigation obvi.
then we can get into teh things we do know.
-multiuple trumpers lied about meeting with russians, to the point of perjury
-trump has admitted to trying to influence the fbi investigation, first with charm, and then by firing the FBI director
-all intel agencies agree the russiand tried to influence the eleciton
-multiple trumpers have worked for russia or FSU nations.
I could go on, but all that is good enough for any reasonable citizen to have reasonable suspicion of the WH, deserving of an investigation.
if you think it is not reasonable suspicion...you are a partisan and should reconsider your life choices.