Make America Great Again wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
So, ignorance of the law is a legitimate defense when caught breaking the law?
That's not the case with 99% of the time. But campaign finance law is different. Read the AP article I linked above.
As usual Gary, you don't know what you are talking about. It seems you are hung up on this quote from the article:
For a criminal prosecution, the Justice Department must prove that a defendant knowingly violated campaign finance laws.
This does not mean that Tiny needed to know what he did was illegal. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse (except in some rare circumstances like if the law was never made public).
The quote means they would have to prove that he knowingly paid the money to influence the election. If he thought he was paying the hush money to protect his family then that would not be illegal.
* But there are tapes.
* And there is the testimony of Cohen.
* And there is the fact that the payments were made in a way specifically intended to shield it from campaign finance law.
* And the payments to both women happened right before the election.
* And the adultery happened a long, long time before the election without anyone seeing the need to pay hush money earlier.
Tiny knew what the hush money was for. He knew it was to help win the election. So, he is guilty.
Our president is a felon. There is no doubt about it and no plea of ignorance is going to fly in a court of law.