Like I said. He has a very simple mind.
Like I said. He has a very simple mind.
Why ? wrote:
Do you know that your view is ethically wrong?
You do not understand the word "ethically".
Urine idiot . wrote:
Congratulations. That's one of the stupidest posts ever on this board.
No one here can steal your crown as the stupidest poster on the LRC boards.
Don't you forget about me wrote:
Logical Man wrote:
Try again if you wish.
Like I said. He has a very simple mind.
Replying to yourself—liking your own post—is a zero sum game.
Trollminator wrote:
Racket wrote:
Here's something to discuss : will Trump and Xi actually make a deal at the G20?
I don’t think China is going to make concessions, unless of course the deal is totally lopsided to their advantage with Trump doing his usual photo op and victory laps on Twitter (think NK). I think will take an awful deal just to say he’s doing something. He’s got to then pray that his trumpers don’t care or don’t notice it is making America worse.
China's economy is actually starting to not look good so it's possible Xi might feel some pressure. The whole thing is such a nightmare. Navaroo says one thing, Mnuchin says another, and Kudlow says neither of them are right.
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I don’t think China is going to make concessions, unless of course the deal is totally lopsided to their advantage with Trump doing his usual photo op and victory laps on Twitter (think NK). I think will take an awful deal just to say he’s doing something. He’s got to then pray that his trumpers don’t care or don’t notice it is making America worse.
China's economy is actually starting to not look good so it's possible Xi might feel some pressure. The whole thing is such a nightmare. Navaroo says one thing, Mnuchin says another, and Kudlow says neither of them are right.
Navaroo, Mnuchin, and Kudlow have no clue how China works. Hint: Stop trying to apply (shove) western ways of think to (on to) eastern ways of thinking.
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I don’t think China is going to make concessions, unless of course the deal is totally lopsided to their advantage with Trump doing his usual photo op and victory laps on Twitter (think NK). I think will take an awful deal just to say he’s doing something. He’s got to then pray that his trumpers don’t care or don’t notice it is making America worse.
China's economy is actually starting to not look good so it's possible Xi might feel some pressure. The whole thing is such a nightmare. Navaroo says one thing, Mnuchin says another, and Kudlow says neither of them are right.
China should wait it out - they gain nothing by taking a bad deal and it might just be worth waiting for him to be gone
Trollminator wrote:
https://www.healthline.com/health/mouth-breathingLogical Man wrote:
INCORRECT! Your logic does not hold any water.
1) There is no logical reason to get stuck on asking "who made that god?".
2) You are projecting your own thought processes onto others with your "so we cling to God as an explanation." INVALID!
3) You have provided NO evidence, either physical or logical, that "it is not possible that it is a “being”."
Try again if you wish.
That is your next try? Seriously?
I see that logic is not your strong suit. Better to resort to cute pics and vacuous insults when logic is brought into the argument.
You have exposed yourself, son.
Logical Man wrote:
That is your next try? Seriously?
You haven't provided anything of value. That was you best 'try'.
selfie wrote:
Don't you forget about me wrote:
Like I said. He has a very simple mind.
Replying to yourself—liking your own post—is a zero sum game.
Not me.
WEJO DO AN IP CHECK AND BAN ME FOREVER IF I AM LOGICAL MAN.
Your try wrote:
Logical Man wrote:
That is your next try? Seriously?
You haven't provided anything of value. That was you best 'try'.
Hi Trollminator
BREAKING!
Fox News files amicus brief on behalf of CNN’s Jim Acosta. Calls out "antagonistic" Trump
https://mobile.twitter.com/learyreports/status/1062733947375968257/photo/1
Hi Trollminator wrote:
Your try wrote:
You haven't provided anything of value. That was you best 'try'.
Hi Trollminator
Wrong, Hi Hardloper. Your bigly felling are hurt. Sad, so sad.
A theologian would say that you just went a long way toward proving God's existence. God is the infinitely supreme being. Surely, you wouldn't argue that infinity doesn't exist? If there is no infinity then modern mathematics collapses.
Sounds familar wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I just do. It's just simple faith. If you don't have it you don't understand. If you do have it, you understand completely.
It seems that you often believe things that have no factual basis.
My faith is a fact.
I think what you are trying to say is that I believe in things I don't fully understand. That is indeed the essence of faith.
Market officially stinks + RCP avg approval now down to 42.9 + House is now Dem + Melania is talking + runaway debt = ????
Fat hurts wrote:
Sounds familar wrote:
It seems that you often believe things that have no factual basis.
My faith is a fact.
I think what you are trying to say is that I believe in things I don't fully understand. That is indeed the essence of faith.
That is not what I'm trying to say.
Reality Bitez wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I just do. It's just simple faith. If you don't have it you don't understand. If you do have it, you understand completely.
How did you get that faith? All on your own?
My faith is based on a personal, individual relationship with Jesus Christ. So it's not on my own. It's between me and Jesus.
Once the House goes to the Dems and blocks Trump policies, the economy will take a downturn.
Feel free to reference this post when it happens.