Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Wrong! wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Yes really. It is not right to chase politicians out of restaurants just because you don't like their views. That's what voting and peaceful protest is for. Targeting individuals in public places like that is beyond what should be.

You're wrong on this. Protests like this get media attention which gets information out to the masses about these individuals. Peaceful protests and voting are what got us into this problem.

Meh...punk tactics like running someone out of a restaurant turns off a lot of people and gives sympathy to the one being run out of the restaurant. There is still right and wrong, and you are encouraging uncivilized behavior.

Trollminator wrote:

Today will be fun, we will get a series of breaking news on this probably ending with a bang in the evening (Avenatti).

DG continues to stay in deep retreat - I think this particularly presses all the wrong the male anxiety buttons for him.

Who needs Lying Gary when now we've got Lying Gary Lite?

I'm done wrote:

I am a lifelong Blue Dog Democrat originally from Texas. . .

Try not to start your post with an obvious lie. Instead, try to sneak your lies in somewhere in the middle of your post. That way some people won't notice.

This message brought to you by The Society of People Who Feel Sorry for Pathological Liars.

Paging “doctor” ford wrote:

Paging “doctor” ford....

Hahahahaha!!!!

That lying gross looking hillary lover is a disgusting piece of trash.

Democrats lose again.

Have you read the sworn declarations supporting Ford?

One is her husband, so throw that out if you like, but the other three were all told this story by Ford years before Kavanaugh was nominated for the Supreme Court.

We now also have at least three women (perhaps 4) who have levied accusations against Kavanaugh including one who has now filed charges against him in Maryland.

Why can you not look at the information and determine that she is very likely telling the truth? I looked at the evidence against Al Franken and John Conyers and knew they were both guilty even though they are Democrats.

I realize you are just trolling, but trolling usually carries a kernel of truth in it. Ford is credible.

Racket wrote:

You found out something posted on the internet was false and you're outraged?

Apparently s/he has never clicked on Breitbart or Infowars...

I just read the declarations and was about to post about it too.

This goes a long, long way toward establishing the credibility of her story.

In past years, Dr. Ford told multiple people about the attempted rape. In each instance, she named Kavanaugh as her attacker.

I, for one, am much more convinced now. It's very unlikely that Kavanaugh is wrongly accused.

Does any of this have anything to do with his ability to do his job? When it does, et back to me.

Hi Lying Gary. How goes?

The same question that you posed could be asked about any criminal (murderer, rapist, cannibal, child molester) for any job (POTUS, SCOTUS, . . . ).

You appear to be living proof that your hero was correct when he claimed, "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters."

.

.

.

Were you once a human being?

Don't Care wrote:

Does any of this have anything to do with his ability to do his job? When it does, et back to me.

Maybe you "Don't Care" if we have a rapist on the Supreme Court.

But in the real world, a member of the Supreme Court needs to be someone of exceptional character.

Also, Kavanaugh has apparently lied to the committee about this and other other matters. We don't want someone on the Supreme Court who perjures himself during the confirmation.

Lastly, a person of poor character is prone to blackmail. Perhaps there is someone with embarrassing , damaging, or criminal information who can get Kavanaugh to rule a certain way. Supreme Court rulings are potentially worth billions of dollars, so the risk of corruption is high.

So yes, this has everything to do with Kavanaugh's ability to do his job.

Why are people giving Christy "Blackout" Blasey any credibility? She's already been outed as a Soros operative.

The GOP disparages women even further.

The super-special prosecutor they hired was called an mere "female assistant" by McConnell.

The GOP could only find the right "female assistant" in Arizona. No "qualified" "female assistants" exist anywhere in-between DC and AZ.

The GOP's "female assistant" works in the county that was run by racist sheriff Joe Arapio -- Trump's very first pardon.

jamin wrote:

Why are people giving Christy "Blackout" Blasey any credibility? She's already been outed as a Soros operative.

It has become very easy to link your style of post to the ones you post using fake names. Why did you you drop the "Dr." in quotes that you always use when posting Ford's name?

Flagpole wrote:

Paging “doctor” ford wrote:

Paging “doctor” ford....

Hahahahaha!!!!

That lying gross looking hillary lover is a disgusting piece of trash.

Democrats lose again.

Have you read the sworn declarations supporting Ford?

That is a jamin post.

Why are there going to be any hearing?

He's not going to be confirmed anyway.

Kavanaugh accuser #3 is out. Julie Swetnick.

“During the years 1981-82, I became aware of efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to ‘spike’ the ‘punch’ at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say ‘No,'” Swetnick says in her statement. “I also witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be ‘gang raped’ in a side room.”

Swetnick also says that she herself became a victim of gang rape in 1982 — and she says that she told two other people what had happened “shortly after the incident.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044960428730843136/photo/2

I question the honesty in your post. Anyhow your perception is wrong. Yes the whole contingent chuckled with Trump at one time, but note the Germans who actually frowned and rolled their eyes when Trump spoke about Germany. They clearly had the face of “stop with the b.s. “. But It doesn’t really matter as He has already lossed dignity and credibility amongst the UN.

#3 is out wrote:

Kavanaugh accuser #3 is out. Julie Swetnick.

“During the years 1981-82, I became aware of efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to ‘spike’ the ‘punch’ at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say ‘No,'” Swetnick says in her statement. “I also witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be ‘gang raped’ in a side room.”

Swetnick also says that she herself became a victim of gang rape in 1982 — and she says that she told two other people what had happened “shortly after the incident.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044960428730843136/photo/2

This was expected by the GOP and that is partly why they assigned this “special assistant” trumper to question Ford on their behalf. Stop and let that sink in for a second - senators have volunteered to limit their own powers to avoid making a total circus out of the hearing tomorrow. This is not Ford’s decision, she wanted to talk to them in front of the country, but they folded.

XY wrote:

I question the honesty in your post. Anyhow your perception is wrong. Yes the whole contingent chuckled with Trump at one time, but note the Germans who actually frowned and rolled their eyes when Trump spoke about Germany. They clearly had the face of “stop with the b.s. “. But It doesn’t really matter as He has already lossed dignity and credibility amongst the UN.

The Germans? Seriously? You consider the opinions of the Germans, who have surrendered their country to the violence and rape of their new Islamic overlords, to be valuable? You want the US to be like f***ng Germany? Christ, you marxists are really and truly criminally insane.

Unless you ARE a German, in which case shame on you for letting your country get rolled over without a fight. Oh, wait, your government left you impotent and unarmed, like our "spying allies" the Brits and Aussies.

I'm still looking forward to hearing what Ford and Kavanaugh have to say when they raise their right hand and swear to tell the truth, but I agree that, from what is publicly known, she seems very credible.

1. She has nothing to gain from making these accusations publicly. She has been attacked as a liar and a fraud, and apparently has received death threats. I can't see that she, or anyone, would subject themselves to this unless she was telling the truth.

2. She told her therapist about the attack years ago.

3. She told several friends and her husband about the attack before Kavanaugh was nominated, and specifically identified him as the attacker.

4. She identified a witness (Mark Judge) who was a friend of Kavanaugh's. If she was making this up, there's no way she puts a witness there, particularly someone who is more likely to side with Kavanaugh.

There seems to be no doubt that she was the victim of a sexual assault. The Republicans' best line of attack is probably to concede that it happened, but to claim that she misidentified her attacker. These corroborating declarations that Ford has obtained, which establish that she positively identified Kavanaugh as her attacker before he was nominated for the SC, undermine that argument. It's hard to believe that this is a Democratic conspiracy when it now involves multiple people corroborating Ford, and doing so under the penalties of perjury.

The fact that Mark Judge, friend of Kavanaugh and a conservative writer of some sort, has gone into hiding in Delaware and seems to want nothing to do with speaking to the Senate, is very suspicious. He did sort of deny what Ford claims to have happened; if he, and Kavanaugh, are telling the truth, you would think he would want to tell his side of the story. I suspect that if he was placed under oath, his story might change a bit from what he (or his attorney) has said publicly.

The argument that Ford shouldn't be believed since she's making these allegations so long after the event happened is not compelling. In fact, the reaction to her that we're seeing now is perfect proof of why she didn't report this any earlier. She's not being believed by many people, and is suspected of having some political motivation. It's not hard to see why a 17 year old girl in 1982 wouldn't have gone to the police to report this incident. Chances are, the police wouldn't have done much of anything.

As I said earlier, I am looking forward to what happens when people start testifying under oath.

More practically speaking, however, I think that Kavanaugh will get confirmed. The fact of the matter is that a lot of people simply don't care if he tried to rape a girl 35 years ago. We all knew what Trump did to women and he still got elected.