Your analysis seems far fetched and delusional to me. Who knows? Thursday out to be interesting.
Your analysis seems far fetched and delusional to me. Who knows? Thursday out to be interesting.
Flagpole wrote:
I sure hope Trump never calls me a "fine person", because everyone he says that about is a criminal or a creep or both.
Haaaaaaaa.... you're right.... Hillary and Bill.
Trump has 23 failed nominees so far:
https://shareblue.com/dr-ronny-jackson-trump-nominee-fail/
I was thinking basically the same as this next quote as I was reading the story, and then there it is at the very end:
"Trump campaigned in 2016 promising he’d only hire the “best people.” But it looks like the best people won’t work for Trump..."
How many firings and resignations from the intelligence world under Trump's tenure?
It's coming wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I sure hope Trump never calls me a "fine person", because everyone he says that about is a criminal or a creep or both.
Haaaaaaaa.... you're right.... Hillary and Bill.
Good point...you got me! I say that applies to Bill (creep), but I say Hillary isn't either.
One doesn't tell the most powerful woman on the planet that she'll "be in jail" to her face without knowing exactly what she's all about.
Buckle up, buttercup.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
McCONnell wrote:
McConnell is a disgraceful pig. The ultimate revenge on him will be to impeach his Kavanaugh--boo hoo. Dems can add four more SCOTUS seats to reduce the workload. Then Dems can ram trough: Obama, Hillary, Kamala Harris, Garland Merrick, and one other democrat to replace lying Kavanaugh. That would make it 9:4 on the SCOTUS with the minority Trumpublicans left to waste away into dust forevermore.
Seriously?
Fool. That is what McConnell will do if the Republicans manage to retain the Senate and House.
If you understood anything, you would know that the SCOTUS has had more than 9 justices in the past. There have been 6, 7, 9 and 10 justices. And there is nothing in the constitution setting a value. And Congress sets the number. And McConnell invented a rule dropping the required votes for SCOTUS from 60 to 51. So all it takes is 51 Democrats to add as many SCOTUS seats as they like. The SCOTUS number has been nine for the last 150 years, and was supposed to be revised upwards for caseload and population increase. Time for a correction on the SCOTUS.
We're almost there wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uJ6djc12l8
[/quote]
But, wait... wrote:
How many firings and resignations from the intelligence world under Trump's tenure?
Well, whatever number it is, you need to at a minimum remove Comey and Sally Yates from that list as both were self serving at a minimum and likely obstruction of justice for Comey.
But, wait... wrote:
How many firings and resignations from the intelligence world under Trump's tenure?
Of course violations of the law have real consequences. Fortunately unverified accusations from thirty years ago will probably go nowhere, and if they do Robespierre justice will prevail forever more.
Flagpole wrote:
Kavanaugh's odds of confirmation have dropped from 71.4% to 46.5% since Friday.
Trump already has his next choice made. The only women he might try to add is Kellyanne Conway. She is not qualified, but that would not matter to Trump. She will protect him at all costs. Trump and Kellyanne have an odd relationship. She is at his side nearly the entire day. She has clearly been using Trump's spray-tanning booth as well. Odd.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
But, wait... wrote:
How many firings and resignations from the intelligence world under Trump's tenure?
Of course violations of the law have real consequences. Fortunately unverified accusations from thirty years ago will probably go nowhere, and if they do Robespierre justice will prevail forever more.
Sedition and treason have REAL consequences.
Trump has another pick ready to go wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Kavanaugh's odds of confirmation have dropped from 71.4% to 46.5% since Friday.
Trump and Kellyanne have an odd relationship. She is at his side nearly the entire day.
Hmmm, kinda Valerie Jarrett and BO.
Did you know they live together? Talk about an "odd relationship".
https://imgflip.com/i/2iqo27The greatest sting in history wrote:
One doesn't tell the most powerful woman on the planet that she'll "be in jail" to her face without knowing exactly what she's all about.
Buckle up, buttercup.
Screenshot.
This will be epic.
Thursday's Q&A after Ford reads her statement.
Outside counsel (OC) asks the 1st question
Ford: Are you a senator?
OC: You know I'm not, Dr. Ford.
Ford: Yes. I do. I will take questions only from senators.
OC: I represent the senators, Dr. Ford. My agreement with them was for me to ask you questions.
Ford: Do you have the power to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court?
OC: No.
Ford: Then I will not take or answer questions from you.
Senator Grassley: Contempt of Court.
Ford: This is not a trial.
Senator Grassley: What? Answer our interrogators questions. She has been very good at protection men accused of sex crimes.
Ford: (walks out the room and she and her attorney drive drive over to Marland to file official charges against Kavanaugh).
But, you're clueless wrote:
Trump has another pick ready to go wrote:
Trump and Kellyanne have an odd relationship. She is at his side nearly the entire day.
Did you know they live together? Talk about an "odd relationship".
I did not know Trump and Kellyanne lived together.
Qs&As wrote:
Thursday's Q&A after Ford reads her statement.
Outside counsel (OC) asks the 1st question
Ford: Are you a senator?
OC: You know I'm not, Dr. Ford.
Ford: Yes. I do. I will take questions only from senators.
OC: I represent the senators, Dr. Ford. My agreement with them was for me to ask you questions.
Ford: Do you have the power to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court?
OC: No.
Ford: Then I will not take or answer questions from you.
Senator Grassley: Contempt of Court.
Ford: This is not a trial.
Senator Grassley: What? Answer our interrogators questions. She has been very good at protection men accused of sex crimes.
Ford: (walks out the room and she and her attorney drive drive over to Marland to file official charges against Kavanaugh).
Ohhhhhh, so Ford (and liberals) doesn't want questions from a female prosecutor who has a long history with sexual assault cases... got it! You want men to question her.
You're pathetic.
Rachel Mitchell. She is a registered Republican and a Trumper. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/female-prosecutor-revealed-rachel-mitchell-will-question-christine-ford-on-thursday/
checkmate... wrote:
https://www.lmtonline.com/news/article/Arizona-prosecutor-emerges-as-GOP-choice-to-13258105.php