Bahahahahahaha....... wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
You are just another Harvey Weinstein look-a-like.
+1!
Thank you. Quite a visual.
Bahahahahahaha....... wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
You are just another Harvey Weinstein look-a-like.
+1!
Thank you. Quite a visual.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/803194969599148032/sIPJp6If.jpghttps://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/harvey_weinstein.jpgGhost of Igloi wrote:
Bahahahahahaha....... wrote:
+1!
Thank you. Quite a visual.
Ah, but which one has a mushroom headed pecker?
Kav the Beast wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Extremely pathetic - going on FOX = desperate appeal to base. Houston, the GOP has a problem
The puppy dog eyes were killer.
His wife seems uncomfortable sitting next to him.
Oh, the makeup he was wearing = killer.
It’s a critical piece of info that he went on FOX. Going on FOX is purely done to speak to the base. This is Kav trying to convince he base that he’s a good guy and that they should be okay with whatever is going on and just show up to vote Republican. It’s a desperation move. If the GOP was feeling confident they would have sent him to some other network where they can ask real questions.
The Republicans have a majority in the Senate. The Dems introduced the concept of majority-vote confirmation for lower-level judges; the GOPers extended it to SCOTUS nominees.
It is inaccurate to talk about the Dems' holding up BK's confirmation. The Republicans can confirm him immediately. If they think there's a problem, then that's on them and not the Democrats (this time).
I think the GOP (and Dems) should just shut up and proceed to an up-or-down vote, then own the result.
Hi Christine Ford! wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Extremely pathetic - going on FOX = desperate appeal to base. Houston, the GOP has a problem
Ummmm, Washington Post, anyone??? Why not the FBI??? Extremely pathetic.
Just do it!! wrote:
The Republicans have a majority in the Senate. The Dems introduced the concept of majority-vote confirmation for lower-level judges; the GOPers extended it to SCOTUS nominees.
It is inaccurate to talk about the Dems' holding up BK's confirmation. The Republicans can confirm him immediately. If they think there's a problem, then that's on them and not the Democrats (this time).
I think the GOP (and Dems) should just shut up and proceed to an up-or-down vote, then own the result.
She won't show up on Thursday, and the vote will follow, swiftly.
The legal team for Ford is now complaining about a prosecutor... they want a male senate committee to question her. It's all a circus.
Swooshhh!!! wrote:
The legal team for Ford is now complaining about a prosecutor... they want a male senate committee to question her. It's all a circus.
The Senate members ALWAYS conduct their own Q&A. They Senate members can ask the questions.
The only circus is the Republicans trying to hide. The Senate members have grilled Anita Hill, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton. Not an outsider.
Swooshhh!!! wrote:
She won't show up on Thursday, and the vote will follow, swiftly.
The legal team for Ford is now complaining about a prosecutor... they want a male senate committee to question her. It's all a circus.
Don't be so certain. Susan Collins wants Ramirez to testify also.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408176-collins-second-kavanaugh-accuser-should-speak-with-senate-panel-under-oathAnd it's incorrect that former classmates don't remember any of this stuff
https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1044370396949164032
Kavanuagh and his friends were obviously creeps. His yearbook and other yearbooks include false bragging about relations with a young girl from another school. She had no idea her name and reputation had been dragged around like that. She even signed a letter of support regarding Kavanugh recently, until learning about the yearbook references to her:
Michael Avenatti tonight on the Rachel Maddow show said that one of his clients will go on live TV within the next 48 hours with claims regarding Kavanaugh participating in gang rapes. I don't know what to believe. But as I posted here a few days ago, supposedly McConnell told Trump to "pick anybody else" because he realized there were problems with Kavanaugh's background.
This tweet from a prominent author tonight references the same thing, that rumors have been out there for a long time:
I have stayed away from a prediction on this until now...
...Brett Kavanaugh will not be a Judge on the Supreme Court. Three accusers now including a client of Pit Bull Michael Avenatti.
Several of you called this already. I am simply agreeing with your correct predictions.
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Michael Avenatti tonight on the Rachel Maddow show said that one of his clients will go on live TV within the next 48 hours with claims regarding Kavanaugh participating in gang rapes. I don't know what to believe. But as I posted here a few days ago, supposedly McConnell told Trump to "pick anybody else" because he realized there were problems with Kavanaugh's background.
Avenatti says he already has multiple witness backing up his client. If he has one or more of the guys involved make confessions, the Kav is toast. He will not get a SCOTUS seat and he will lose his current judgeship. His best bet is become Trump's new Michael Cohen.
with other witnesses wrote:
His best bet is become Trump's new Michael Cohen.
Which I realized after posting might already be a done deal if he crashes to the ground.
Accuser Deborah Ramirez told the New Yorker she was drunk & her memory had gaps. Two male students at the party, the wife of a student & three classmates told the reporter there is NO WAY Kavanaugh assaulted Ramirez.
The New Yorker ran with the story ANYWAY.
Concerning the first accuser Dr Ford. She was a loose party girl who drank a TON. This is a part of her past which the left furiously wants to hide:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Accuser Deborah Ramirez told the New Yorker she was drunk & her memory had gaps. Two male students at the party, the wife of a student & three classmates told the reporter there is NO WAY Kavanaugh assaulted Ramirez.
The New Yorker ran with the story ANYWAY.
Concerning the first accuser Dr Ford. She was a loose party girl who drank a TON. This is a part of her past which the left furiously wants to hide:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn6TVaoWkAAQ83L.jpg
Avenatti says 48 hours. I wouldn't bet against what he says he has.
Also, quit with the fake stuff:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blasey-online-photos/Prediction: Ford will not testify on Thursday. She will have to manufacture events that never happened and risk perjury.
Kavanaugh will be confirmed
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Accuser Deborah Ramirez told the New Yorker she was drunk & her memory had gaps. Two male students at the party, the wife of a student & three classmates told the reporter there is NO WAY Kavanaugh assaulted Ramirez.
The New Yorker ran with the story ANYWAY.
Concerning the first accuser Dr Ford. She was a loose party girl who drank a TON. This is a part of her past which the left furiously wants to hide:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn6TVaoWkAAQ83L.jpgAvenatti says 48 hours. I wouldn't bet against what he says he has.
Also, quit with the fake stuff:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blasey-online-photos/
Don't take that from away from, it's all he's got...