Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

One week wrote:

Oops GOP wrote:

Trump's strategy appears to be:

-- Get McConnell to delay a vote on Kavanaugh until a week or so before the election

-- Trump rides to the rescue and removes Kavanaugh from consideration for the SCOTUS before a vote can be taken

-- Trump and the GOP claim that removing Kavanaugh proves without a doubt that they are the party of pro-women's rights

-- Trump and the GOP pray that conservative women will vote in droves for them, and that women who are swing votes will flock to their side.

LOL . . . The expected new voting date for Kavanaugh is end of October. That is just one week before the November 6th mid-terms.

This just in. Unbelievable.

The woman has given the Senate several open dates to chose from. The Senate chose a date that is not on her list. Now the GOP is crying that the hearing will not happen because she will not be available, even though they knew she was not available.

So, no hearing on Monday.

Obama's Transparency wrote:

agip wrote:

while I'm at it, trump revealing classified information about an ongoing investigation of himself is about the clearest example of abuse of power I can think of.

the idiot trumpers saying 'hey, just lie back and think of the economy' are basically traitors. Not legally, but they are aiding and abetting the enemies of democracy.

Or the transparency that Obama promised but never delivered.

Depends on which color glasses you are wearing.

which ongoing investigation did Obama try to wreck by declassifying documents for?

was it an investigation of himself?

There is nothing in my past. Attempted rape is a big deal. But also this was 35 years ago when he was a minor. If this was years earlier it would be a bigger deal. It’s also unproven it’s just an accusation.

Name calling makes you sound so adult and mature.

Alan

One week wrote:

One week wrote:

LOL . . . The expected new voting date for Kavanaugh is end of October. That is just one week before the November 6th mid-terms.

This just in. Unbelievable.

The woman has given the Senate several open dates to chose from. The Senate chose a date that is not on her list. Now the GOP is crying that the hearing will not happen because she will not be available, even though they knew she was not available.

So, no hearing on Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/kavanaugh-hearing/index.html

This is proof the GOP doesn’t have their $hit together. They knew this was a bad candidate and now they are hesitating - they are in meltdown mode now. The Dems will have even more time to beat the discrimination drums to the public. The Senate is possible after all and may soon become likely for the Dems. Keep it up GOP idiots.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Attempted rape is a big deal. But also this was 35 years ago when he was a minor.

Your "he was a minor" excuse does not fly. He was 17 and of the age of sexual consent. She was 15 and NOT of the age of sexual consent. This has been pointed out to you several times. You still refuse to accept that legal reality. She is the legal minor. He is not.

let's just stipulate that if the parties were reversed, so would the positions of all the characters on this thread.

this is just more partisan politics - really sick of it.

Trollminator wrote:

One week wrote:

This just in. Unbelievable.

The woman has given the Senate several open dates to chose from. The Senate chose a date that is not on her list. Now the GOP is crying that the hearing will not happen because she will not be available, even though they knew she was not available.

So, no hearing on Monday.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/kavanaugh-hearing/index.html

This is proof the GOP doesn’t have their $hit together. They knew this was a bad candidate and now they are hesitating - they are in meltdown mode now. The Dems will have even more time to beat the discrimination drums to the public. The Senate is possible after all and may soon become likely for the Dems. Keep it up GOP idiots.

Picking a bad date was intentional by the GOP. It lets then blame her for not coming to be interrogated. It also allows them to delay a vote on Kavanaugh while claiming that a delay is not their fault.

as the GOP planned wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

This is proof the GOP doesn’t have their $hit together. They knew this was a bad candidate and now they are hesitating - they are in meltdown mode now. The Dems will have even more time to beat the discrimination drums to the public. The Senate is possible after all and may soon become likely for the Dems. Keep it up GOP idiots.

Picking a bad date was intentional by the GOP. It lets then blame her for not coming to be interrogated. It also allows them to delay a vote on Kavanaugh while claiming that a delay is not their fault.

The newest GOP plan is to limit the witness at the hearing for the sexual abuse allegation. The GOP refuses to have witness testimony from a claimed witness to the event, Kanvanugh's best friend.

Mark Judge, who Ford said witnessed is not to be interviewed. Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said Tuesday that he sees “no reason” for Judge to appear before the Judiciary Committee, on which he sits.

agip wrote:

let's just stipulate that if the parties were reversed, so would the positions of all the characters on this thread.

this is just more partisan politics - really sick of it.

I don’t fully accept that. Do you see yourself taking the side of the accused as a first reaction to a sexual misconduct allegation, even if he were a Democrat nominee? I can’t toggle my position on this stuff. I felt just as strongly about Roy Moore as I did about Franken. Get them all the fvck out.

Also those who sexual assault typically have a history of assault, violence, sexual harassment, etc. I find it hard to believe that a guy would assault someone at 17, get away with it, and never commit the crime again or engage in other sexually deviant behavior.

I’m thinking she just had buyers remorse, or is misremembering the details.

Again, just my opinion. No more right or wrong than anyone else’s. There’s no corroboration.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also those who sexual assault typically have a history of assault, violence, sexual harassment, etc.

You are completely wrong.

perhaps you should link a story that supports your point, that she offered several dates and GOP picked another date. There is nothing in the CNN story that says that.

I am glad to hear that there is nothing untoward in your past related to sexual assault. That is definitely good news.

And I am also very happy to finally see a somewhat reasonable post on this topic by you.

The allegations are indeed unproven and just an accusation. Which is why we should all wait for the hearings to see if additional light is shed. In the meantime we should also all refrain from throwing out BS theories about what really happened.

Thanks in advance.

agip wrote:

let's just stipulate that if the parties were reversed, so would the positions of all the characters on this thread.

this is just more partisan politics - really sick of it.

Let's just stipulate that you are full of sh!t once again. My position would not be changed one iota. I will let others speak for themselves but my guess is that there are many on here who have a solid level of integrity (which appears to be inconceivable to you).

It does seem from your last sentence that you simply can't stand conflict, tire of it, and simply wish it would go away. I can understand that. But I have no respect for your weariness leading you to impugn the integrity of others.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also those who sexual assault typically have a history of assault, violence, sexual harassment, etc. I find it hard to believe that a guy would assault someone at 17, get away with it, and never commit the crime again or engage in other sexually deviant behavior.

I’m thinking she just had buyers remorse, or is misremembering the details.

Again, just my opinion. No more right or wrong than anyone else’s. There’s no corroboration.

Alan

Why do you assume he would have never committed a crime or engaged in sexually deviant behavior again?

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also those who sexual assault typically have a history of assault, violence, sexual harassment, etc. I find it hard to believe that a guy would assault someone at 17, get away with it, and never commit the crime again or engage in other sexually deviant behavior.

I’m thinking she just had buyers remorse, or is misremembering the details.

Again, just my opinion. No more right or wrong than anyone else’s. There’s no corroboration.

Alan

Oops, looks like I was too quick to thank you. More of your BS theories.

Here, let me make it easy for you. The right answer is that you have no idea and eagerly await the senate hearings.

You're welcome.

agip wrote:

let's just stipulate that if the parties were reversed, so would the positions of all the characters on this thread.

this is just more partisan politics - really sick of it.

Not me. I haven't been posting much because I don't really have a position right now. We don't have many facts to go on.

On this issue of Kavanaugh vs. Ford, people here are fabricating facts at a rate I've never seen before.

Duane wrote:

perhaps you should link a story that supports your point, that she offered several dates and GOP picked another date. There is nothing in the CNN story that says that.

Perhaps you should learn to use the interwebs to support your point that the GOP picked a good date. As it turns out: the accused and her attorney were not consulted about the date of Monday before they announced that was the date she was to show up. Just another typical GOP tactic to avoid an issue. Is the GOP really so inept that they cannot confirm a hearing date before announcing it?

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also those who sexual assault typically have a history of assault, violence, sexual harassment, etc. I find it hard to believe that a guy would assault someone at 17, get away with it, and never commit the crime again or engage in other sexually deviant behavior.

The first time I saw a picture of Kavanaugh I told my wife -- "that guy is a perv." There's a twinkle in his eye, or maybe it's hair haircut, it's just a dead giveaway. Guaranteed.