Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rapier? wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Every time there is any sort of criticism of Trump or anyone on the right, this the immediate response - pointing to the other side “if they do it we can do it”. That is a fvcked view on things and shows you have no moral standards of your own. Also, you may not like the way the former (hence irrelevant) VP behaves but has anyone who has been touched by him complained that it was unwelcome and formally accused him? Accusations of rape are not the same as touching. Get your head examined.

Is he accused of rape?

A 17 year old boy having sex with a 15 year old girl is considered rape even if she consented.

Trollminator wrote:

Let's go deeper wrote:

So, you're ok with SCOTUS justice's with a history of saying it's ok for 12 year old's to give consent? You're ok with VP's touching children inappropriately while they pull away from him... on camera?

Also, you may not like the way the former (hence irrelevant) VP behaves but has anyone who has been touched by him complained that it was unwelcome and formally accused him? .

Maybe they will come forward 35 years from now and do so.

15 vs 17 wrote:

Rapier? wrote:

Is he accused of rape?

A 17 year old boy having sex with a 15 year old girl is considered rape even if she consented.

Did she say they had sex?

Maybe someday wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Also, you may not like the way the former (hence irrelevant) VP behaves but has anyone who has been touched by him complained that it was unwelcome and formally accused him? .

Ouch!

Maybe they will come forward 35 years from now and do so.

Trollminator wrote:

Let's go deeper wrote:

So, you're ok with SCOTUS justice's with a history of saying it's ok for 12 year old's to give consent? You're ok with VP's touching children inappropriately while they pull away from him... on camera?

Every time there is any sort of criticism of Trump or anyone on the right, this the immediate response - pointing to the other side “if they do it we can do it”. That is a fvcked view on things and shows you have no moral standards of your own. Also, you may not like the way the former (hence irrelevant) VP behaves but has anyone who has been touched by him complained that it was unwelcome and formally accused him? Accusations of rape are not the same as touching. Get your head examined.

Does the fact that no one has complained (some have) or accused him make what he did right?

Rapier? wrote:

15 vs 17 wrote:

A 17 year old boy having sex with a 15 year old girl is considered rape even if she consented.

Did she say they had sex?

Legally that makes no difference.

Re: Biden wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Every time there is any sort of criticism of Trump or anyone on the right, this the immediate response - pointing to the other side “if they do it we can do it”. That is a fvcked view on things and shows you have no moral standards of your own. Also, you may not like the way the former (hence irrelevant) VP behaves but has anyone who has been touched by him complained that it was unwelcome and formally accused him? Accusations of rape are not the same as touching. Get your head examined.

Does the fact that no one has complained (some have) or accused him make what he did right?

Well geez, the obvious looks of discomfort are completely easing and justified. The deeper questions is, with video evidence, why the denial?

Trollminator wrote:

Let's go deeper wrote:

So, you're ok with SCOTUS justice's with a history of saying it's ok for 12 year old's to give consent? You're ok with VP's touching children inappropriately while they pull away from him... on camera?

Every time there is any sort of criticism of Trump or anyone on the right, this the immediate response - pointing to the other side “if they do it we can do it”. That is a fvcked view on things and shows you have no moral standards of your own. Also, you may not like the way the former (hence irrelevant) VP behaves but has anyone who has been touched by him complained that it was unwelcome and formally accused him? Accusations of rape are not the same as touching. Get your head examined.

YOU HAVE NO MORAL STANDARDS. IF TRUMP HAD DONE THIS, YOU'D BE ALL OVER HIM! A$$HOLE!

NOT YOUR 12 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER, RIGHT?

15 vs 17 wrote:

Rapier? wrote:

Did she say they had sex?

Legally that makes no difference.

Learn you something:

"A man who commits an overt act will be convicted for an assault with intent to rape, if the victim is under the age of consent and has expressed their willingness to such overt act. The reason being that a child cannot consent to the crime of rape or to an assault with the intent to commit rape."

15 vs 17 wrote:

15 vs 17 wrote:

Legally that makes no difference.

Learn you something:

https://rape.uslegal.com/assault-with-intent-to-commit-rape/

There IS a legal difference.

Here’s what the democrats received as evidence of misconduct:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BnwjBsVnSN1/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet

Democrats are queers

15 vs 17 wrote:

15 vs 17 wrote:

Legally that makes no difference.

Learn you something:

https://rape.uslegal.com/assault-with-intent-to-commit-rape/

Here's some advice, son. Don't post again until you are at least an L2.

Once a Lawyer wrote:

15 vs 17 wrote:

Learn you something:

https://rape.uslegal.com/assault-with-intent-to-commit-rape/

There IS a legal difference.

Yup. Age 15 is not a legal age of consent in the US.

White is black, 1 is 2, insane is sane wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So she's not a popular professor?

If that's all the R's have got on her they are going to have a lot of trouble discrediting her as a witness.

Ohhhhh, right... that's all. Or, the fact that Kavanaugh's mom ( a judge) ruled against her parent's in a foreclosure case. It'll keep coming, and as always, your delusion will be further uncovered. Keep denying, we know it's an uncurable mental disorder.

Indeed, you'll need to keep it coming. They must not have any real dirt on Christine Ford if that's the best you can do. So far it looks like she's going to make a great witness.

Wise 1 wrote:

Here's some advice, son. Don't post again until you are at least an L2.

Here is a score for you, old man. 0/10

Fat hurts wrote:

White is black, 1 is 2, insane is sane wrote:

Ohhhhh, right... that's all. Or, the fact that Kavanaugh's mom ( a judge) ruled against her parent's in a foreclosure case. It'll keep coming, and as always, your delusion will be further uncovered. Keep denying, we know it's an uncurable mental disorder.

Indeed, you'll need to keep it coming. They must not have any real dirt on Christine Ford if that's the best you can do. So far it looks like she's going to make a great witness.

She has stated she wants a public interrogation by the Republicans. Let's watch the Republican try to force their interrogation to be classified as top secret.

Obvi wrote:

Attempted rape should disqualify anyone from EVER serving on the SCOTUS. To think otherwise is to trivialize the crime or to dishonor the SCOTUS. Possibly both.

Sorry, but it really is that simple.

He's being accused of sexual assault, not rape.

He is not currently guilty of anything. Why are you all so determined it's a done deal? The only prudent action is to follow through with an investigation and do the due diligence. I don't like the guy, but let's not call him a certified rapist yet.

Trumpers are in total panic mode over an easy-to-find-someone-else Supreme Court nominee. They will go into bigly panic mode when Trump gets impeached.