Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Johnny99. wrote:
If Benghazi had happened the exact same way under Trump's watch, he'd have been hunted and ripped apart for years. I guess you didn't lose a love one in Benghazi , did ya little fella?
sigh....STILL with the "BENGHAAAAZIII !!" , huh?? Dude, you literally are out of your mind if you are still ranting and obsessed with "BENGHAAZZZI!!"
Did YOU "lose a loved one in Benghazi ,... little fella" ?? Unless you are related to U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, or CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty" (which I highly doubt you are), then you didn't either.
While I got you here, let's compare two tragic attacks on the US.
DATE:
1) 9/11/01
2) 9/11/12
LOCATION:
1) on US soil, multiple major US cities (NYC, D.C., )
2) not on US soil, one foreign city (Benghazi)
CASUALTIES:
1) 2500+ Americans died, almost 400 foreigners died. Nearly 6000 injured.
2) 4 Americans died, roughly 10 injured
DAMAGE/DESTRUCTION COST:
1) Trillion $'s?? Add in the response of the Iraq War, TrillionS of $'s
2) A pittance compared to above. 1000's of $'s
WARNING OF POTENTIAL OR EVEN IMMINENT ATTACKS, AND REQUEST TO TAKE THESE SERIOUSLY?
1) YES, most certainly, many warnings of imminent attack given to admin including memo entitled: "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" which referenced recent "suspicious activity related to preparations for hijackings." Also, Richard Clarke (chief counter-terrorism adviser on the National Security Council) and others repeatedly warned Bush admin to take the Al Q threat in the US more seriously.
2) YES , warnings were made that terrorists groups were gaining strength in Libya, and requests were made for more security
WARNINGS OF POTENTIAL ATTACK HEEDED?
1) No, completely ignored by an Admin obsessed with figuring out a way to remove Saddam Hussein from power, and by a president spending much of his time mountain biking and clearing brush on his ranch
2) No, extra security was not given.
PARTY OF PRESIDENT:
1) Republican
2) Democrat
So...we have 2 tragic attacks on the US, both occurring on 9/11. In both cases warnings of potential attacks were given. In both cases, they were not properly heeded. Both were tragic.
BUT..... the one on 9/11/01 resulted in 1000 x more deaths and injures, and a 10000000x more damage, destruction, and $ down the drain than the BENGHAZI one on 9/11/12. The first one absolutely dwarfs the second by a massive amount in every measure of tragedy/horrible event for the US.
But your response to the first 9/11 ??
"Oh well $hit happens, no one's fault, no one ever could have seen that coming. Let's not point fingers or blame anyone. No need to hold anyone responsible. Go BUSH, SHOCK and AWE that damn Saddam and those Iraqi's for attacking us!! USA, USA! "
And your response to the 2nd 9/11 ??
"OMG, OMG, OMG!! this is the WORST TRAGEDY in our HISTORY!! I want someone's head, and I want it NOW!!! Someone must pay for this! This is the worst crime in US history. The worse security lapse in our history! And the coverup, OMG, OMG, OMG!!! Someone must pay!! That evil Clinton, Obama, and Rice are responsible for this! We must investigate, WE MUST INVESTIGATE!"
And you say that, DESPITE.....
" Despite persistent accusations against President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Susan Rice, ten investigations — six by Republican-controlled congressional committees — did not find that they or any other high-ranking Obama administration officials had acted improperly. "
In conclusion, you are a typical insane right winger, with absolutely no sense of objectivity.