Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

In other news, Trump’s master is about to hold the biggest military exercise since 1981, involving more than 300,000 personnel and we will hear no complaints from Putin’s apprentice. There’s a bigger chance he’ll praise it on Twitter.

Why should we complain about Russia's military exercises?

PIO! wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

In other news, Trump’s master is about to hold the biggest military exercise since 1981, involving more than 300,000 personnel and we will hear no complaints from Putin’s apprentice. There’s a bigger chance he’ll praise it on Twitter.

Why should we complain about Russia's military exercises?

The two countries' Western neighbors have been worried. They causes the most excitement and concern because it is the one that most closely resembles practice for war with NATO.

The thing about Fox News and right wing radio are that they cut both ways. While it's true that the deplorable types have exploded in number and are a lost cause, it's also true that Republicans can no longer feign moderate like the old days and end up with 54 or 56% of the vote. Thirty years I was much more worried about Republican presidential prospects and conservative politicians in general because they could hide their true agendas behind bullshit campaign themes and isolated speeches and TV appearances. I knew how crooked they were but the public at large was fooled. Sorry, those days are long gone. Now we hear all the clips with "legitimate rape" and "alternative facts" and "truth isn't the truth" and "what you are seeing and what you are hearing isn't what is happening" and so forth.

That's why I continue to emphasize...Never Prevent a Conservative from Sounding Like a Conservative.

It is all a great regulator. Let the Republican congressman blame his wife for all the shady spending. First time registers are absorbing all of it and they are not self identifying as Republicans or as conservatives. The Republican has only won the popular vote once since 1988. Let that sink in. The Republican has only won the presidential popular vote in 2004, among every presidential election beginning in 1992. It is a monumental fluke that twice they took the electoral college within that time frame. But since the moronic conservative base doesn't understand how unlikely that is, and that the demographics are slipping away, they somehow believe that 46% is fine and dandy, so let's keep going with all of our fear and hatred and racism and divisiveness and misogyny. In fact, let's ramp it up.

What could possibly go wrong? The country will love us.

agip wrote:

hey republicans - you're a bunch of cheaters. You are being caught, state by state. No honor, no pride.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/2018/08/27/fc04e066-aa46-11e8-b1da-ff7faa680710_story.html?utm_term=.f05b148ec551

The democrats are a bunch of cheaters, always have been. Ever hear of super delegates? Dear Lord you are so pathetically stupid I hope you don't have a partner who has to bear the brunt of your ignorance.

Hillary is a lying crook who is old news. Democrats are sore losers, always have been. Trump is not getting impeached who little sheep flagpole follower. Ever think for yourself Johnny Boy?

If Benghazi had happened the exact same way under Trump's watch, he'd have been hunted and ripped apart for years. I guess you didn't lose a love one in Benghazi , did ya little fella?

And so is CNN and MSNBC you simpleton. Don't you post and then re-read what you post and say "Gosh, I'm stupid"? You're whole post could be describing any Liberal. How dumb are you?

Pretty good handle, but it's better with the lower case "j".

Trump approval rating steadily plummeting 4% since August 21st, from 42.1% to 38.1% today, with 56% disapproval.

Cool rolling link from Ipsos. I'm not sure how it will show up here, but good link to keep and check occasionally:

http://polling.reuters.com/#!response/CP3_2/type/smallest/dates/20170828-20180828/collapsed/true

Awsi Dooger wrote:

Trump approval rating steadily plummeting 4% since August 21st, from 42.1% to 38.1% today, with 56% disapproval.

MINUS 18% and dropping link the Titanic into the deep abyss.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

RE: Official LRC President Donald J Trump Inauguration Thread

johnny99

What has the govt turned into? wrote:

This is troubling.

Yaaaaaawwwnnnn.

It was established in Nunes' memo that the information came from an article published on the Internet.

Awsi Dooger wrote:

It is a monumental fluke that twice they took the electoral college within that time frame.

No it's not. General elections are typically won on very narrow margins. Each party has a huge block of voters who vote party first. Elections are not about those voters. Elections are about either getting some infrequent voters out, or appealing to a small number of voters who ignore party affiliation.

Every election cycle has it's own unique set of factors. In very general terms, Trump and Preibus got enough infrequent voters to the polls to win the electoral college.

LOL . . . in the news today:

"Lawyers for U.S. President Donald Trump have asked a federal judge to dismiss a defamation lawsuit by adult film actress Stormy Daniels, calling it an attempt to suppress the president’s free speech."

Since when is having sex with someone considered free speech?

Michelle Goldberg continues to be the best opinion writer at The NYT.

"Donald Trump flouts the Constitution, raking in money from supplicants who curry favor with him by patronizing his gaudy hotels. Congress is silent. The president’s commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, was accused of effectively stealing more than $120 million in various schemes — Forbes described him as possibly one of the “biggest grifters in American history.” It barely registered in the headlines. ProPublica reported that a trio of random Trump cronies with neither military nor government experience is secretly running the Veterans Affairs Department out of Mar-a-Lago. Republicans have made no plans for hearings. The president’s former lawyer testified that Trump directed him to commit felonies to cover up alleged affairs in advance of the election. The shock lasted about 48 hours."

There is no defending any of this, but Republicans have gone to extraordinary lengths and exercised deliberate negligence in order to cover it all up. The slightest amount of congressional oversight would yield mountains of evidence easily worthy of impeachment. The importance of the November elections cannot be overstated.

Diss Missle wrote:

LOL . . . in the news today:

"Lawyers for U.S. President Donald Trump have asked a federal judge to dismiss a defamation lawsuit by adult film actress Stormy Daniels, calling it an attempt to suppress the president’s free speech."

Since when is having sex with someone considered free speech?

Pretty sure that the defamation claims have to do with Trump's comments about Stormy Daniel's claims. They are not about "having sex with someone."

///

Try to think before posting.

PIO! wrote:

Diss Missle wrote:

LOL . . . in the news today:

"Lawyers for U.S. President Donald Trump have asked a federal judge to dismiss a defamation lawsuit by adult film actress Stormy Daniels, calling it an attempt to suppress the president’s free speech."

Since when is having sex with someone considered free speech?

Pretty sure that the defamation claims have to do with Trump's comments about Stormy Daniel's claims. They are not about "having sex with someone."

///

Try to think before posting.

I did not make that reply. Please go away, handle thief.

November is the time for America to admit it made a mistake in 2016 and render the remainder of Trump's presidency impotent.

Johnny99. wrote:

If Benghazi had happened the exact same way under Trump's watch, he'd have been hunted and ripped apart for years. I guess you didn't lose a love one in Benghazi , did ya little fella?

sigh....STILL with the "BENGHAAAAZIII !!" , huh?? Dude, you literally are out of your mind if you are still ranting and obsessed with "BENGHAAZZZI!!"

Did YOU "lose a loved one in Benghazi ,... little fella" ?? Unless you are related to U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, or CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty" (which I highly doubt you are), then you didn't either.

While I got you here, let's compare two tragic attacks on the US.

DATE:

1) 9/11/01

2) 9/11/12

LOCATION:

1) on US soil, multiple major US cities (NYC, D.C., )

2) not on US soil, one foreign city (Benghazi)

CASUALTIES:

1) 2500+ Americans died, almost 400 foreigners died. Nearly 6000 injured.

2) 4 Americans died, roughly 10 injured

DAMAGE/DESTRUCTION COST:

1) Trillion $'s?? Add in the response of the Iraq War, TrillionS of $'s

2) A pittance compared to above. 1000's of $'s

WARNING OF POTENTIAL OR EVEN IMMINENT ATTACKS, AND REQUEST TO TAKE THESE SERIOUSLY?

1) YES, most certainly, many warnings of imminent attack given to admin including memo entitled: "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" which referenced recent "suspicious activity related to preparations for hijackings." Also, Richard Clarke (chief counter-terrorism adviser on the National Security Council) and others repeatedly warned Bush admin to take the Al Q threat in the US more seriously.

2) YES , warnings were made that terrorists groups were gaining strength in Libya, and requests were made for more security

WARNINGS OF POTENTIAL ATTACK HEEDED?

1) No, completely ignored by an Admin obsessed with figuring out a way to remove Saddam Hussein from power, and by a president spending much of his time mountain biking and clearing brush on his ranch

2) No, extra security was not given.

PARTY OF PRESIDENT:

1) Republican

2) Democrat

So...we have 2 tragic attacks on the US, both occurring on 9/11. In both cases warnings of potential attacks were given. In both cases, they were not properly heeded. Both were tragic.

BUT..... the one on 9/11/01 resulted in 1000 x more deaths and injures, and a 10000000x more damage, destruction, and $ down the drain than the BENGHAZI one on 9/11/12. The first one absolutely dwarfs the second by a massive amount in every measure of tragedy/horrible event for the US.

But your response to the first 9/11 ??

"Oh well $hit happens, no one's fault, no one ever could have seen that coming. Let's not point fingers or blame anyone. No need to hold anyone responsible. Go BUSH, SHOCK and AWE that damn Saddam and those Iraqi's for attacking us!! USA, USA! "

And your response to the 2nd 9/11 ??

"OMG, OMG, OMG!! this is the WORST TRAGEDY in our HISTORY!! I want someone's head, and I want it NOW!!! Someone must pay for this! This is the worst crime in US history. The worse security lapse in our history! And the coverup, OMG, OMG, OMG!!! Someone must pay!! That evil Clinton, Obama, and Rice are responsible for this! We must investigate, WE MUST INVESTIGATE!"

And you say that, DESPITE.....

" Despite persistent accusations against President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Susan Rice, ten investigations — six by Republican-controlled congressional committees — did not find that they or any other high-ranking Obama administration officials had acted improperly. "

In conclusion, you are a typical insane right winger, with absolutely no sense of objectivity.

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

Johnny99. wrote:

If Benghazi had happened the exact same way under Trump's watch, he'd have been hunted and ripped apart for years. I guess you didn't lose a love one in Benghazi , did ya little fella?

. . .

In conclusion, you are a typical insane right winger, with absolutely no sense of objectivity.

Everybody knows that. Tell us something that everyone does not already know.