Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

for the record, HRC had 2% more of the popular vote than Donald. for the record, Donald had 14% more E.C. Votes.

look, votes are important and I'm glad he won, but if you want to get political about it, stop lying and accept the system as it's been for decades and decades. and don't get your facts wrong;)

Flagpole wrote:

Change your handle back wrote:

Bro, you forgot to change your handle back to Bigfoot Investments.

Got to be careful switching between accounts.

Nope. I am not Bigfoot Investments.

WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Washington post is right. No it's wrong. No it's right. No it's wrong. Wait, I agree, so I'll post this.

B.S. Dumb right wingers may have been scared away by the vicious lying attack ads on Trump and then voted for Hillary, but not the other way around.

You made NO point. You're wrong again and I proved it.

R & R wrote:

The guy could really use some Rudy and Roseanne right now. Not my president. He is making America gross again.

So then, what's the problem? Just move, we don't need you here.

this emoluments case is showing some sticking power and might work. Dude went to every dictionary the writers of the constitution could have read and found that in 92% of the cases, 'emoluments' meant profit of any kind could not be accepted by potus, without the approval of congress.

Which means spanky would have to sell his entire overseas portfolio, unless congress gives him an ok.

I thought this was a nothing case, but a judge looked at the data and says it's real.

If anything would drive spanks out of office, it is the possiblity of losing a lot of money.

“Every English dictionary definition of ’emolument’ from 1604 to 1806″ uses a “broad definition,” including “profit,” “advantage,” “gain,” or benefit,” he wrote in his paper describing the research.

As to the “office-and-employment-specific” interpretation by Trump’s team, Mikhail wrote that “over 92 percent of these dictionaries define ’emolument’ . . . with no reference to ‘office’ or ’employment.’ ”

In other words, by his research, the emoluments clause would bar any benefit or profit to a president via a foreign state, whether in his capacity as president or in any other role, such as the owner of a hotel. It would, specifically, cover Saudi Arabia or Kuwait renting out space at the Trump International Hotel in Washington."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/07/27/trumps-emoluments-battle-how-a-scholars-journey-through-200-years-of-dictionaries-helped-win-a-historic-ruling/?utm_term=.c7572dcaa604

well maybe he wouldn't have to sell his entire overseas portfolio, but all this money spent by foreign governments at his properties would have to stop.

agip wrote:

well maybe he wouldn't have to sell his entire overseas portfolio, but all this money spent by foreign governments at his properties would have to stop.

Trump would have to stop making money off of the Russian Dachas he has sold and rented at Trump Condos. Oh, my. A bigly disaster.

Spending is UP wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Net exports boosted growth, adding 1.06 percentage point to the quarter’s GDP growth. Consumer spending rose 4%. Contributing 2.69 percentage points to growth

You are a retard. Do you understand WHY consumer spending was up? Because the cost of goods has gone up. Why has the cost of goods gone up? Because of Trump's dumbarse tariffs.

Only a Trumper would cheer that spending more to buy the same things, while not getting a pay raise, is a win for Trump.

Trumpers are true retards.

Conservatives have held that type of warped thinking for decades. Somehow they define a tax as only the bottom line on their federal form. Meanwhile, are added health care costs a tax? How about prescription drugs? Gas prices? We've basically doubled since Bush's war. On and on. This tariff stuff is simply par for the Republican course. But as long as they scare old people, keep billionaires happy, and convince the simplistic angry uneducated white males into believing that the daddy party will keep their taxes low, every cycle you get millions of people who vote Republican despite it being totally against their economic well being.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The American people will vote with their wallets and as James Carville once coined in Bill's 1992 campaign, "the economy stupid." This is what matters to most people.

I guess you have something to worry about given the stock market averages declined today.

agip wrote:

this emoluments case is showing some sticking power and might work. Dude went to every dictionary the writers of the constitution could have read and found that in 92% of the cases, 'emoluments' meant profit of any kind could not be accepted by potus, without the approval of congress.

Wouldn't it be ironic if Trump is done in because Republicans kept putting strict constructionists on the court?

Fat hurts wrote:

agip wrote:

this emoluments case is showing some sticking power and might work. Dude went to every dictionary the writers of the constitution could have read and found that in 92% of the cases, 'emoluments' meant profit of any kind could not be accepted by potus, without the approval of congress.

Wouldn't it be ironic if Trump is done in because Republicans kept putting strict constructionists on the court?

Yep.

Harry Leinenweber, a Reagan-nominated district court judge, thoroughly rebuked Sessions' efforts to penalize sanctuary cities

Judge strikes down law underpinning Sessions' anti-sanctuary city push

Trump is a SOCIALIST says George Will (R). So does Senator Ron Johnson (R). . . .LOL.

When the president decided to give farmers a $12 billion bandage for the wound he inflicted on them with his splendid little (so far) trade war, and when other injured interests joined the clamor for comparable compensations, [Senator Ron] Johnson said, “This is becoming more and more like a Soviet type of economy here: Commissars deciding who’s going to be granted waivers, commissars in the administration figuring out how they’re going to sprinkle around benefits.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-could-teach-ocasio-cortez-a-thing-or-two-about-socialism/2018/07/27/f4672a2e-9102-11e8-bcd5-9d911c784c38_story.html

Do you really think anybody but you reads the crap you post? Your links are fake.

Trump is a SOCIALIST says George Will wrote:

Trump is a SOCIALIST says George Will (R). So does Senator Ron Johnson (R). . . .LOL.

When the president decided to give farmers a $12 billion bandage for the wound he inflicted on them with his splendid little (so far) trade war, and when other injured interests joined the clamor for comparable compensations, [Senator Ron] Johnson said, “This is becoming more and more like a Soviet type of economy here: Commissars deciding who’s going to be granted waivers, commissars in the administration figuring out how they’re going to sprinkle around benefits.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-could-teach-ocasio-cortez-a-thing-or-two-about-socialism/2018/07/27/f4672a2e-9102-11e8-bcd5-9d911c784c38_story.html

Many Democrats called Hillary an "un-honest person" and a "crook". You voted for her and were either uninformed or just plain ignorant. Which is it?

Fat hurts wrote:

agip wrote:

this emoluments case is showing some sticking power and might work. Dude went to every dictionary the writers of the constitution could have read and found that in 92% of the cases, 'emoluments' meant profit of any kind could not be accepted by potus, without the approval of congress.

Wouldn't it be ironic if Trump is done in because Republicans kept putting strict constructionists on the court?

Wouldn't it be ironic if you're wrong and Hillary goes to jail?

Quality posters only wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Wouldn't it be ironic if Trump is done in because Republicans kept putting strict constructionists on the court?

Wouldn't it be ironic if you're wrong and Hillary goes to jail?

bark

Fat hurts wrote:

agip wrote:

this emoluments case is showing some sticking power and might work. Dude went to every dictionary the writers of the constitution could have read and found that in 92% of the cases, 'emoluments' meant profit of any kind could not be accepted by potus, without the approval of congress.

Wouldn't it be ironic if Trump is done in because Republicans kept putting strict constructionists on the court?

heh - yes that would be very amusing. Heh.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The American people will vote with their wallets and as James Carville once coined in Bill's 1992 campaign, "the economy stupid." This is what matters to most people.

I guess you have something to worry about given the stock market averages declined today.

LMAO! The market was down on Friday and the sky is falling. All the stock major indexes are within 3-4% of all time highs. Try again.

A reporter goes to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s district and asks if taxpayers should pay for all the “free stuff” that’s promised with socialism. The reply was “no, like um it should come from the government... “

This video is comedy gold.

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11166

The probes are getting closer.

Trump is in the waiting room.

Only a fool believes that the SDNY and/or Mueller won't take him down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJe1iUuAW4M