agip wrote:
It’s the economy stupid wrote:
Democrats lose again!!!!!
when the economy grew this fast or faster under Obama did you post 'republicans lose again?'
More whataboutism. Smh
agip wrote:
It’s the economy stupid wrote:
Democrats lose again!!!!!
when the economy grew this fast or faster under Obama did you post 'republicans lose again?'
More whataboutism. Smh
1100 wrote:
1100 wrote:
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
^^^Flagpole posts again under a different handle;)
Clintonettes are NOT Americans!
In other news, water is wet.
Bigfoot Investments wrote:
But on the odd chance that Rigged wishes to argue that the answer to the followup question is "Yes" then the burden is on him (her?)
Astroturfer could be a him one day, a her the next.
Lots of violence including murder by the far right at rallies such as Charlottesville. You're a hypocrite.
DiscoGary wrote:
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
Another day, another violent assault by the intolerant, vicious left. You cannot even wear M A G A (sadly I can't even type this on this board) gear without getting violently attacked by the Socialists.
Stay armed, people. Get your concealed carry permit and always have a weapon on you. Keep an AR-15 in your house for when things get really bad.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/shocking-video-brawl-breaks-out-at-trumps-star-on-hollywood-blvd-youth-pastor-youtuber-assaulted-and-robbed/Yep. The left has gone full Nazi fascist. Arm up. Be ready.
Black Rifles Matter wrote:
Another day, another violent assault by the intolerant, vicious left. You cannot even wear M A G A (sadly I can't even type this on this board) gear without getting violently attacked by the Socialists.
Stay armed, people. Get your concealed carry permit and always have a weapon on you. Keep an AR-15 in your house for when things get really bad.
Hey, it's Lying Gary! Here with your daily dose of crazy!
Way to go, Lying Gary!
///
Lying Gary
Bigfoot Investments wrote:
The Guy who says wrote:
And again, just in case you missed it the first time:
"So . . . all of these politicians spend hundreds of millions of dollars on ads that have no influence on elections?
That seems odd."
This ^
The question that Rigged poses ("How many liberals on this board changed their vote to Trump because an ad made them change their minds?") is idiotic and irrelevant.
A better and more relevant question is: "Do campaign activities influence election outcomes?" The indisputable answer is "Yes".
The followup question is, "Were the campaign activities of the Russians so fundamentally different than other campaign activities that they somehow managed to NOT influence the election outcome?" The answer is obviously, "No."
But on the odd chance that Rigged wishes to argue that the answer to the followup question is "Yes" then the burden is on him (her?) to state the manner in which all of the Russian activities during the election cycle were fundamentally different than those funded and run by Americans such that they had zero impact while the American-based activities had a non-zero impact.
Are you up for it, Rigged?
That has to be one of the stupidest things posted on this thread.
You had to work to get that title, but, by gosh, you did it.
Bigfoot Investments wrote:
The Guy who says wrote:
And again, just in case you missed it the first time:
"So . . . all of these politicians spend hundreds of millions of dollars on ads that have no influence on elections?
That seems odd."
This ^
The question that Rigged poses ("How many liberals on this board changed their vote to Trump because an ad made them change their minds?") is idiotic and irrelevant.
A better and more relevant question is: "Do campaign activities influence election outcomes?" The indisputable answer is "Yes".
The followup question is, "Were the campaign activities of the Russians so fundamentally different than other campaign activities that they somehow managed to NOT influence the election outcome?" The answer is obviously, "No."
But on the odd chance that Rigged wishes to argue that the answer to the followup question is "Yes" then the burden is on him (her?) to state the manner in which all of the Russian activities during the election cycle were fundamentally different than those funded and run by Americans such that they had zero impact while the American-based activities had a non-zero impact.
Are you up for it, Rigged?
You libs just can't let it go. (as was posted earlier today):
"There were no ads posted by Russia.
Anti-Hillary ads, yep. Anti-Trump ads, yep and plenty of them. Did either come from Russia, nope.
Yeah sure, people were going to vote for Hillary, saw an ad showing her in a bad light and said, "Hell I'll vote for Trump, even after all of the evil things said about him"...sure they did.
But of course they didn't see a nasty ad about Trump and change their minds to Hillary, no one in America could do that.
You're dumb enough to believe it because HRC LOST!
POST THE ADS WITH PROOF, YOU CAN'T!"
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Bigfoot Investments wrote:
This ^
The question that Rigged poses ("How many liberals on this board changed their vote to Trump because an ad made them change their minds?") is idiotic and irrelevant.
A better and more relevant question is: "Do campaign activities influence election outcomes?" The indisputable answer is "Yes".
The followup question is, "Were the campaign activities of the Russians so fundamentally different than other campaign activities that they somehow managed to NOT influence the election outcome?" The answer is obviously, "No."
But on the odd chance that Rigged wishes to argue that the answer to the followup question is "Yes" then the burden is on him (her?) to state the manner in which all of the Russian activities during the election cycle were fundamentally different than those funded and run by Americans such that they had zero impact while the American-based activities had a non-zero impact.
Are you up for it, Rigged?
You libs just can't let it go. (as was posted earlier today):
"There were no ads posted by Russia.
Anti-Hillary ads, yep. Anti-Trump ads, yep and plenty of them. Did either come from Russia, nope.
Yeah sure, people were going to vote for Hillary, saw an ad showing her in a bad light and said, "Hell I'll vote for Trump, even after all of the evil things said about him"...sure they did.
But of course they didn't see a nasty ad about Trump and change their minds to Hillary, no one in America could do that.
You're dumb enough to believe it because HRC LOST!
POST THE ADS WITH PROOF, YOU CAN'T!"
So, in other words, you are not up for it. I understand. It would be difficult "to state the manner in which all of the Russian activities during the election cycle were fundamentally different than those funded and run by Americans such that they had zero impact while the American-based activities had a non-zero impact."
But heck, I'll give you another chance. Let's see if you can do it this time.
Charlottesville wrote:
Lots of violence including murder by the far right at rallies such as Charlottesville. You're a hypocrite.
DiscoGary wrote:
Yep. The left has gone full Nazi fascist. Arm up. Be ready.
Nope. In Charlottesville Democrats showed up and attacked the "Nazis" in attempt to deprive them of the right to free speech. Democrats drew first blood just like they did at Trump rallies. You are a useful idiot, and will believe any propaganda the MSM feeds you. You are a danger to yourself and every decent citizen in the country.
Bigfoot Investments wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You libs just can't let it go. (as was posted earlier today):
"There were no ads posted by Russia.
Anti-Hillary ads, yep. Anti-Trump ads, yep and plenty of them. Did either come from Russia, nope.
Yeah sure, people were going to vote for Hillary, saw an ad showing her in a bad light and said, "Hell I'll vote for Trump, even after all of the evil things said about him"...sure they did.
But of course they didn't see a nasty ad about Trump and change their minds to Hillary, no one in America could do that.
You're dumb enough to believe it because HRC LOST!
POST THE ADS WITH PROOF, YOU CAN'T!"
So, in other words, you are not up for it. I understand. It would be difficult "to state the manner in which all of the Russian activities during the election cycle were fundamentally different than those funded and run by Americans such that they had zero impact while the American-based activities had a non-zero impact."
But heck, I'll give you another chance. Let's see if you can do it this time.
You are one dumb skunk-ape.
DiscoGary wrote:
"Nazis"
Pretty sure demonstrators were literally waving the Nazi flag around
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite_the_Right_rallyThankfull wrote:
Racket wrote:
Economy picks up by 4.1% for Q2. Probably spurred on by the tax cuts and a now seriously overheated economy but it's good news for GOP heading into midterms. I doubt Q3 results will be bad enough to make an impact on elections. Blue Wave is pretty much going to rely on getting currently registered democrats out to vote since I still see no reason why Trump supporters would jump ship (yet) and go to the other side.
You can thank Obama.
Net exports boosted growth, adding 1.06 percentage point to the quarter’s GDP growth. Consumer spending rose 4%. Contributing 2.69 percentage points to growth. The economy is on a roll. Growth solves many problems! This is all due to new Trump economic policies which Obama had ZERO to do with.
The last time a sitting president had year where GDP averaged over 3% growth was 13 years ago. An entire generation has no clue what America winning looks like. You’re seeing it now.
M-A-G-A!!!
https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/309382/us-gdp-to-hit-elusive-3-annual-growth-in-13-years-5-pickshttps://money.cnn.com/2018/07/27/news/economy/us-gdp-economic-growth/index.html?utm_source=twmoney&utm_term=image&utm_content=2018-07-27T12%3A35%3A20&utm_medium=socialRacket wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
"Nazis"
Pretty sure demonstrators were literally waving the Nazi flag around
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite_the_Right_rally
Th ONLY people behaving like violent Nazi fascists are Democrats.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Net exports boosted growth, adding 1.06 percentage point to the quarter’s GDP growth. Consumer spending rose 4%. Contributing 2.69 percentage points to growth
You are a retard. Do you understand WHY consumer spending was up? Because the cost of goods has gone up. Why has the cost of goods gone up? Because of Trump's dumbarse tariffs.
Only a Trumper would cheer that spending more to buy the same things, while not getting a pay raise, is a win for Trump.
Trumpers are true retards.
Nope. In Charlottesville thousands of violent white supremacists showed up rocking Swastikas, Confederate flags and AR15s, and vocally embraced racism and killing Jews and blacks. You are entitled to free speech, but you are not free from its consequences.
DiscoGary wrote:
Nope. In Charlottesville Democrats showed up and attacked the "Nazis" in attempt to deprive them of the right to free speech. Democrats drew first blood just like they did at Trump rallies. You are a useful idiot, and will believe any propaganda the MSM feeds you. You are a danger to yourself and every decent citizen in the country.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
It’s the economy stupid wrote:
www breitbart com/big-government/2018/07/27/soaring-consumer-spending-drives-gdp-to-4-1-in-q2/
Democrats lose again!!!!!
Everyone is a winner on the Right, and average is the new winning. Good job, liberal.
Literally NO ONE on Wall Street was impressed because their economics department is telling them recent deregulation, tax policies don't work.
Trade wars are like cocaine to an economy. Right now, the economy is on the high before prices increase, trade slows, and the hangover starts. Wall Street knows this. That's why the indexes didn't respond positively to the numbers.
When you Dems nominate a leftist to run against Trump in 2020, you might as well give up. Trump is going to destroy that candidate. What are you going to run on? More taxes? More regulations? Abolish ICE?
Your fate will be 6 1/2 more years of liberal heads exploding.
Clownpole is coming
Mueller isn't.
Charlottesville wrote:
Nope. In Charlottesville thousands of violent white supremacists showed up rocking Swastikas, Confederate flags and AR15s, and vocally embraced racism and killing Jews and blacks. You are entitled to free speech, but you are not free from its consequences.
DiscoGary wrote:
Nope. In Charlottesville Democrats showed up and attacked the "Nazis" in attempt to deprive them of the right to free speech. Democrats drew first blood just like they did at Trump rallies. You are a useful idiot, and will believe any propaganda the MSM feeds you. You are a danger to yourself and every decent citizen in the country.
You guys can't agree that BOTH sides were wrong in Charlottesville?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Thankfull wrote:
You can thank Obama.
The last time a sitting president had year where GDP averaged over 3% growth was 13 years ago. An entire generation has no clue what America winning looks like. You’re seeing it now.
l
for the record, year over year growth right now is in the 2.8% range, not over 3%, and also for the record, in the Obama years there were at least four quarters with the same or more growth that this past quarter had.
Put another way, the economy did not just grow 4% in a year. It grew 1% from one quarter to the next, then if that same growth happens four straight quarters, we will then have 4% growth. 4 quarters X 1%. Right now, year over year, the number is 2.8%, which isn't bad.
look growth is good and I hope for more, but if you want to get political about it, stop lying or getting the facts wrong.
https://medium.com/@ushadronsRigged for Hillary wrote:
There were no ads posted by Russia.
Charlottesville wrote:
Nope. In Charlottesville thousands of violent white supremacists showed up rocking Swastikas, Confederate flags and AR15s, and vocally embraced racism and killing Jews and blacks. You are entitled to free speech, but you are not free from its consequences.
DiscoGary wrote:
Nope. In Charlottesville Democrats showed up and attacked the "Nazis" in attempt to deprive them of the right to free speech. Democrats drew first blood just like they did at Trump rallies. You are a useful idiot, and will believe any propaganda the MSM feeds you. You are a danger to yourself and every decent citizen in the country.
What consequences?
Des Linden: "The entire sport" has changed since she first started running Boston.
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Ryan Eiler, 3rd American man at Boston, almost out of nowhere
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion