HI FLAGPOLE! How's the heat in Ohio? Turned up to high for ya?
Poor baby, yes Hillary got soundly beat by Trump, ouch!!!
HI FLAGPOLE! How's the heat in Ohio? Turned up to high for ya?
Poor baby, yes Hillary got soundly beat by Trump, ouch!!!
foo wrote:
apig wrote:
No. 2.1% and the majority came from one state, California.
Trump kicked her butt in the electoral college by a HUGE percentage. Do try not to cry too much agipster, it's bleeding thru your posts.
And a Trumper responds right on queue...
Great post indeed. Trump trounced her!
non jamin wrote:
2016 not rigged for either side wrote:
I'd bet my life that's not what the poster was saying. Comprehension is not your thing fp. Now it's my turn.
1) No, move because you complain all the time.
2) You don't like this country, it's obvious, as complain all the time (see #1).
3) Obama was anything but a great president. The worse, no. Great?, that's a stretch.
4) You've bragged about money on this site. Silent stealth brags, but yes you have.
5) Keywords "don't necessarily". Yes, I know a thing or two. Fact: 52 year olds don't necessarily know a thing or two (I think that's what you meant to post).
Your guess is...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Fact is...
Mueller is not coming.
Trump finishes his first term.
You'll still be grasping for straws.
E.g., Russia and Facebook (laughable), popular vote (see California or let it go), etc...
Here's a fact that you never bring up: Clinton won the popular vote by 2.1%, but...
*Clinton won 227 Electoral Votes, 42.2% of the total
*Trump won 306 Electoral Votes, 56.9% of the total, 14.7% more than Clinton!
*There were 7 faithless electors out of 538, Hillary lost 5 of her pledged electors, yes 5 who "refused" to vote for her.
Trump won ***14.7%*** more electoral votes than Clinton. One state cannot decide an election for either side, neither California, Texas or New York, but one country can.
The Electoral College elected Obama in 2008 and re-elected him in 2012, just like the Electoral College elected Trump in 2016. Thanks Ohio, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Iowa.
Get over it, you lost fp. Like everything else, you're never wrong, ever (you must be hell to live with).
You'll read this post and respond with something that's just the opposite. You'll bend and twist my post like there's no tomorrow. I've never read posts by a more sore loser than you since this thread started, expect for the 2 posters pop_pop!/agip. They beat you in deflecting the truth, that I will admit.
Go ahead and twist away, I won't be posting as today is my birthday and I have better things to do than debate a bunch of incessant complainers.
Ha, ha, ha!!!! GREAT POST DUDE!!!!! Now the Democrats don't want to talk about Trump's big victory in the Electoral College, only because he beat Hillary so badly there.
Flagpole? Crickets? Flagpole? Crickets? Flagpole? Crickets?
Face it brother, you were soundly beat with that post and it irritates you, doesn't it?:)
Yes, he whipped her pretty good! Thanks Donald for defeating lying Hillary.
How you dumb democrats can't see what she did is incomprehensible.
Wait for it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIvyE2JeJj0
Unbelievable!!!!! Dear God you liberals are really stupid and blind as bats.
I saw that video and I agree with it 100%, but...I truly don't believe that she'll ever get locked up, I really don't.
Too much power and influence for that to happen. I'm not extreme right or extreme left, but for anyone on the left to not understand how corrupt she was makes them look very ignorant. I've voted Democrat more than once and I can't look away and deny what she did.
R U Really is that Stupid wrote:
R U Really wrote:
Are you really so stupid that you do not understand the difference between:
A) Expecting people in other countries to speak your own native language (ugly American style)
and
B) Being comfortable with people speaking the language of their own choice regardless of where they are
????
Seriously? You are honestly that stupid?
You come here, learn the language or stay where you were born. Yes, you are that stupid>>>> "R U Really". That's only racist in your sissy definition. If I go to the Middle East, I don't expect them to understand me and that's not their fault, I need to learn THEIR language as it's THEIR country.
So yes, you really are that stupid>>>R U Really.
Hi Lying Gary. How goes?
Thanks for confirming your almost unimaginable levels of stupidity.
Here's a hint for you: These two things are NOT alike:
1) Choosing to converse among family and friends in the language of your own choosing
2) Expecting others to understand the language that you choose to speak even when you are in a country in which said language is not the dominant language
I know, challenging concept for someone as stupid as you. But give it a try. Some day you may actually succeed in understanding something. Understanding anything at all, even the simplest of facts, would be such wonderful progress for you.
///
Lying Gary
Uh oh wrote:
How you dumb democrats can't see what she did is incomprehensible.
Wait for it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIvyE2JeJj0Unbelievable!!!!! Dear God you liberals are really stupid and blind as bats.
That's hilarious. I mean truly hilarious.
Thanks for sharing it. It is a good reminder that there actually exist people who take such comically transparent conspiracy theories seriously.
Awesome.
nothing to look at, just another trump cabinet member making a million dollars because he broke ethics laws.
Carry on. Trumpers gonna trump. Grifters gonna grift.
but remember, no matter how many ethics laws trumpers break or how many children Trumpers put in cages, Democrats are insane to oppose his administration. Dems clearly are an violent, amoral party out to throw conservatives in concentration camps.
Got that straight? Good.
agip wrote:
nothing to look at, just another trump cabinet member making a million dollars because he broke ethics laws.
Carry on. Trumpers gonna trump. Grifters gonna grift.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/783150/commerce-secretary-wilbur-ross-made-over-1-million-by-failing-follow-ethics-laws
Yep, more corruption in the administration.
DG and others called Obama the most corrupt POTUS ever, but now with actual, legitimate corruption running amok in the current administration, all we hear is how mean and vindictive Liberals are while completely dismissing all of the abusive White House behavior.
I thought Trump was the Law and Order POTUS. If he was, then he would fire 2/3 of his staff and himself. A Law and Order POTUS doesn't put up with 1+ years of Pruitt's shenanigans.
Trump hates American workers. He refuses to offer them a living wage. His solution: hire foreigners. (Trump takes all worker tips for himself.)
DiscoGary's Trump party of peace and love . . . nope.
Ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen retains Clinton-era fixer Lanny Davis to fend off attacks from Trump associates
Hires former Clinton operative Lanny Davis to handle abuse from . . . the White House
Cohen needs protection--from Trump Associates wrote:
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/07/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-retains-clinton-era-fixer-lanny-davis-fend-off-attacks-trump-associates/
Dang! Let me get out some popcorn! This is gonna be GOOD!
///
MIC
TCID
DiscoGary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Why are you being so butthurt on Trump’s behalf and why do you hate freedom of speech so much? This is how people rally support, it’s how they show others what they think. Trump tweets to the world, others blow up balloons and others paint, who cares? You are really fvcking stupid if you think it’s unfair that Trump, our of all people, is catching flak from protesters around the globe. He literally asks for it every single day. He loves it because he wants you to keep believing he’s a victim, just like he makes you keep believing you are a victim. The main thing you have in common with Trump is that you are both self-declared victims, while completely disregarding exactly how you got to that point. He doesn’t give a fvck about you or America, but you are too blinded by your victim hood to see that.
Hey look! You DO understand it, but you just can't help yourselves can you? Insulting Trump binds him to everyone else who has been insulted by the Left for decades. Shake off the hate buddy. Focus. The logical conclusion is that continuing this barrage of Trump insults will continue to strengthen his base. Therefore, flying a state sponsored caricature of Trump over London will be counter-productive. Right? You following me here?
The way to weaken Trump is to STOP insulting him and his followers every day and tell his followers "We get it. We called you uneducated racists for decades, blamed you for things you didn't do, treated you like second class citizens, and on our best day we ignored you and that was wrong. We apologize and we're going to make it up to you. We are going to treat you fairly from now on. Here are the changes we're making in policy XYZ to fix it."
If I'm general of the Liberal army, those are the orders I give.
The elephant-size problem with your strategic logic is that you can only fit your theory to one single political event in recent history, which is the election of Trump. So you are like the coin flipper who flipped tails 30x in a row and finally got heads and said “aha I won, see!”. So broadly speaking every liberal has been more right than you over the decades. What you are failing miserably to see is that NOT criticizing Trump is an affirmation that somehow he’s doing a good job, which of course he isn’t. That constant pounding of Trump fvck ups in the MSM is what will rally liberals and Democrats, just like the constant pounding of negativity and doomsday bull$hit by FOX and conservative radio has fired up the right. Not exposing the essence of Trump’s incompetence and mal-intent to all would be a serious ethical blunder. You are cheering for the a$$hole bad guy who doesn’t give a fvck about you, but who you identify with. I’m sorry you were emotionally weak and fell for it.
Sez the guy wrote:
Says the guy who was so distraught after election night that he didn’t post here for 3 months.
Disappointed. Yes. Distraught? Not even close. Also, I posted the day after the election. Other than that, nothing interesting was happening for a while...took a while before we really knew what we elected.
Flagpole wrote:
Sez the guy wrote:
Says the guy who was so distraught after election night that he didn’t post here for 3 months.
Disappointed. Yes. Distraught? Not even close. Also, I posted the day after the election. Other than that, nothing interesting was happening for a while...took a while before we really knew what we elected.
Yeah and you're not too quick on the uptake are you? What do I mean by that?
If Hillary would have won it would have taken awhile for you to really know what you elected.
You're in denial Flagpole, period.
I would have taken that Socialist Sanders over her and been fine, but her? You obviously are biased or haven't read too much on what your vote would have gotten you. She's what you call Trump everyday on this thread. If she were a Republican, you'd hate her to the max!
DiscoGary wrote:
For students of political science this post is a great example of what I call "historical guilt" that the Right uses when it becomes clear that their side has done something really bad and it can't be spun or hidden. Here's how it works:
Go back in time as far as necessary to find a crime committed by a democrat that is as bad or worse than the current scandal.
Disco,
I fixed a few words for you. You can't even see when your precious right wingers use the "well, what about......"tactic.
Bill Clinton deserves the Cy Young Award for his relieving efforts whenever the GOP is in trouble for sex related scandals.
DiscoGary wrote:
For students of political science this post is a great example of what I call "historical guilt" that the Left uses when it becomes clear that their side has done something really bad and it can't be spun or hidden. Here's how it works:
Historical Guilt:
1. Something horrible is done in the name of Liberalism.
2. It can't be ignored.
3. It can't be spun into "nothing to see here".
4. Go back in time as far as necessary to find a crime committed by a conservative that is as bad or worse than the current scandal.
5. Declare conservatives to be hypocrites for trying to stand up to whatever crime was committed by the Lib.
I'm beginning to understand. Gary, I found a quote from a dirty Liberal President who opened America's borders an ruined everything:
immigrants "brought with them courage and the values of family, work, and freedom. Let us pledge to each other that we can make America great again."
Guess who!
DiscoGary wrote:
uk person wrote:
It isn't "state sponsored" it's crowd funded. FAKE NEWS.
The mayor of London Kahn gave the go ahead for flying it near the HoP. It is now state sponsored.
So now that it’s been established that it’s not sponsored by the Deep State are you suggesting certain citizens shouldn’t be able to exercise their freedoms because Trump is in town? What are you afraid of?