An Independent wrote:extremist liberals
Please define this phrase very precisely.
An Independent wrote:extremist liberals
Please define this phrase very precisely.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
An Independent wrote:extremist liberals
Please define this phrase very precisely.
Anyone who does not support Trump 110%.
Well, Trumpers are not Republicans. That is the true reality of what Trump has done to the party.
-- It would be nice to think the GOP is still redeemable, but if not, then those who want to preserve America as a country of immigrants will have to vote against Republicans.
-- Unfortunately, the Republican Party today would reject Reagan and his hopeful, welcoming message [about allowing immigration].
-- President Trump rejects facts
-- The GOP refuses to provide a solution for “dreamers.”
-- Scores of Republican officeholders who still support immigration. However, the majority of the party is following Trump down his anti-immigrant rabbit hole, while politicians who should know better (e.g. Speaker of the House Paul D. Ryan) stand idly by.
nvrtrumperrealrethug wrote:
Have a good 4th of July, Flagpole.
Think your happy thoughts about Mueller coming and the clown being done. I hope you are right eventually.
Thank you. You have a good 4th also.
I WILL be proved right.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
An Independent wrote:extremist liberals
Please define this phrase very precisely.
Ummm...sure. The answer would be "YOU".
Flagpole/LL are easily triggered! Poor babies!
Fixed it for you^
Smells like FP/LL wrote:
Flagpole/LL are easily triggered! Poor babies!
Fixed it for you^
Ya got me there buddy! I'm a lying liberal 8 days a week. Just give me the free programs and let my side pilfer the offering box.
The Original P.i.m.p. Baller wrote:
foo wrote:
Back in the real world, Trump continues to fill the swamp with corruption:
http://digg.com/2018/scott-pruitt-corruption-listCan Trump supporters offer any justification for this thief continuing to have a job? He should have been out on his ass long, long ago. He is openly, brazenly corrupt, yet Trump has kept him around and defended him at every turn.
Anything goes as long as liberals are mad!
No, they can't defend Pruitt or his actions. They were promised that Trump would rid DC of this kind of behavior. Instead, Trump has brought more of it.
They make general statements like "the FBI is corrupt" or "the CIA is corrupt", but when provided with a detailed list of the ridiculous crap Pruitt has done, there is silence.
Flagpole wrote:
nvrtrumperrealrethug wrote:
Have a good 4th of July, Flagpole.
Think your happy thoughts about Mueller coming and the clown being done. I hope you are right eventually.
Thank you. You have a good 4th also.
I WILL be proved right.
I was trolling you, geez, get over yourself already.
But, you won't be and you'll have your tail between your legs old man when Trump finishes his first term unscathed.
Since you like to correct people, it's "proven", not proved. Ever take an English Class?
nvrtrumperrealrethug wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Thank you. You have a good 4th also.
I WILL be proved right.
I was trolling you, geez, get over yourself already.
But, you won't be and you'll have your tail between your legs old man when Trump finishes his first term unscathed.
Since you like to correct people, it's "proven", not proved. Ever take an English Class?
You don't know Jack! I know Jack and let me tell you son - you're no Jack!
And since you like to correct people, it's "tooken", not "take". Ever tooken an English Class?
nvrtrumperrealrethug wrote:
But, you won't be and you'll have your tail between your legs old man when Trump finishes his first term unscathed.
Since you like to correct people, it's "proven", not proved. Ever take an English Class?
Learn to use punctuation. Your first sentence needs work.
Learn not to use contractions when taking the high-grammar road (e.g. will not rather than won't).
Learn that the comma goes inside of a double quotation marks.
… and learn when you are being trolled, troll.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
An Independent wrote:extremist liberals
Please define this phrase very precisely.
The previous 2 posts under the name "An Independent" were not me. I guess it is the price of not registering a name.
I am not sure if I can give you a precise definition of extremist liberal. An example of one might be someone who wants the US to more or less have open borders to illegals. Another issue that seemed out there was the gay wedding cake scenario. Why did the left have to politicize it so much? The couple should have just gone to a different baker. Someone else would have agreed to bake it.
Open borders to illegals?
They aren't illegals if you declare open borders.
The extreme left want people who are seaking asylum to be treated like humans in trouble, not criminals.
L L wrote:
Open borders to illegals?
They aren't illegals if you declare open borders.
The extreme left want people who are seaking asylum to be treated like humans in trouble, not criminals.
But there is a proper channel for legal immigration. I would think legal immigrants would be somewhat frustrated about illegal immigrants as well.
L L wrote:
Open borders to illegals?
They aren't illegals if you declare open borders.
The extreme left want people who are seaking asylum to be treated like humans in trouble, not criminals.
The post that answered an "extreme liberal" was anyone who did support Trump 100% was absolutely correct about who the "An Independent" really is. That troll spews what he hears on Fox News. Open borders do not exist in the US. And "liberals" are not advocating them. Fox News and Trump are screaming about open borders--lies--to excite their base (which includes "An Independent").
An Independent wrote:
I am not sure if I can give you a precise definition of extremist liberal. An example of one might be someone who wants the US to more or less have open borders to illegals. Another issue that seemed out there was the gay wedding cake scenario. Why did the left have to politicize it so much? The couple should have just gone to a different baker. Someone else would have agreed to bake it.
HI HARDLOPER!
110% wrote:
L L wrote:
Open borders to illegals?
They aren't illegals if you declare open borders.
The extreme left want people who are seaking asylum to be treated like humans in trouble, not criminals.
The post that answered an "extreme liberal" was anyone who did support Trump 100% was absolutely correct about who the "An Independent" really is. That troll spews what he hears on Fox News. Open borders do not exist in the US. And "liberals" are not advocating them. Fox News and Trump are screaming about open borders--lies--to excite their base (which includes "An Independent").
Fair enough. I am not trying to be contentious. I was just trying to understand the left perspective on some issues. Yes, the media does lie. I don't watch Fox News, but I sometimes read articles on their website.
Happy Fourth to everyone! And I mean that sincerely! I do think we are a great nation.
An Independent wrote:
110% wrote:
The post that answered an "extreme liberal" was anyone who did support Trump 100% was absolutely correct about who the "An Independent" really is. That troll spews what he hears on Fox News. Open borders do not exist in the US. And "liberals" are not advocating them. Fox News and Trump are screaming about open borders--lies--to excite their base (which includes "An Independent").
Fair enough. I am not trying to be contentious. I was just trying to understand the left perspective on some issues. Yes, the media does lie. I don't watch Fox News, but I sometimes read articles on their website.
Happy Fourth to everyone! And I mean that sincerely! I do think we are a great nation.
Goodness, Hardloper. Your trolling is getting weaker, and weaker. No surprise, actually.
Please define this phrase (extremist liberal) very precisely. /// The previous 2 posts under the name "An Independent" were not me. I guess it is the price of not registering a name. I am not sure if I can give you a precise definition of extremist liberal. An example of one might be someone who wants the US to more or less have open borders to illegals. Another issue that seemed out there was the gay wedding cake scenario. Why did the left have to politicize it so much? The couple should have just gone to a different baker. Someone else would have agreed to bake it.
L L wrote:
Open borders to illegals?
They aren't illegals if you declare open borders.
The extreme left want people who are seaking asylum to be treated like humans in trouble, not criminals.
That was a bizarre response. You asked the poster to provide his own definition of "extremist liberal" and then you simply tell him that is the wrong definition?
WTF?