are you trolling me?
the IG made it crystal clear that there is zero evidence that they did not separate their political views from the investigation.
I'm done here - either you are trolling or uninformed.
are you trolling me?
the IG made it crystal clear that there is zero evidence that they did not separate their political views from the investigation.
I'm done here - either you are trolling or uninformed.
Boom! Stormy's lawsuit against Trump is pretty much over and so are her 15 minutes.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
agip wrote:
are you trolling me?
the IG made it crystal clear that there is zero evidence that they did not separate their political views from the investigation.
I'm done here - either you are trolling or uninformed.
Yeah, Rigged, Disco, and numerous others are intentionally obtuse. They all seem to love gas-lighting and deliberately lie and post garbage nonsense that isn't just nonsense, it's intended to misinform and obfuscate. They're trolls, probably here for the sole purpose of misdirection.
Liars, Gary, Rigeed, Trump, all of em. Liars.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Boom! Stormy's lawsuit against Trump is pretty much over and so are her 15 minutes.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-19/stormy-daniels-loses-effort-to-restart-lawsuit-against-trump
Like ship said. Stop reading your right wing sources and then get back to me.
Herewegoagain! wrote:
agip wrote:
are you trolling me?
the IG made it crystal clear that there is zero evidence that they did not separate their political views from the investigation.
I'm done here - either you are trolling or uninformed.
Yeah, Rigged, Disco, and numerous others are intentionally obtuse. They all seem to love gas-lighting and deliberately lie and post garbage nonsense that isn't just nonsense, it's intended to misinform and obfuscate. They're trolls, probably here for the sole purpose of misdirection.
Liars, Gary, Rigeed, Trump, all of em. Liars.
Probably all Russians too.
agip wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
When an FBI agent is removed from a task force/field/investigative team & reassigned to HR, that IS punishment. Strozk & Page failed to separate their political views from the investigation and made it very clear where their political loyalties lied. You fail again.
are you trolling me?
the IG made it crystal clear that there is zero evidence that they did not separate their political views from the investigation.
I'm done here - either you are trolling or uninformed.
Any agent who works for one of the alphabet organizations such as CIA, FBI, NSA, etc and is pulled from the field to be put into HR to push paper, has experienced career suicide and is that is a de facto punishment. In this case Strozk & Page ruined their FBI careers- they will NEVER move up the FBI ladder. The endgame here is that they will both be fired or resign their positions. Unfortunately, you are too dense to see this.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Any agent who works for one of the alphabet organizations such as CIA, FBI, NSA, etc and is pulled from the field to be put into HR to push paper, has experienced career suicide and is that is a de facto punishment. In this case Strozk & Page ruined their FBI careers- they will NEVER move up the FBI ladder. The endgame here is that they will both be fired or resign their positions. Unfortunately, you are too dense to see this.
The IG found no political bias in the investigation. The reason they were reassigned to paper pushers probably had a lot to do with the fact they both carried on an extra-marital affair for quite some time.
U Stop it wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Boom! Stormy's lawsuit against Trump is pretty much over and so are her 15 minutes.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-19/stormy-daniels-loses-effort-to-restart-lawsuit-against-trumpLike ship said. Stop reading your right wing sources and then get back to me.
LOL ... the only thing the judge did was keep the 90 day stay they began in April. Stormy has to wait another month. Then onward with the lawsuit against Trump.
(Reuters) - A federal judge in Los Angeles has rejected a request by the adult film actress Stormy Daniels to restart her lawsuit there against U.S. President Donald Trump and his longtime lawyer Michael Cohen.
In an order dated Tuesday, U.S. District Judge James Otero said the amount of media attention in the case was not a sufficient reason to reconsider the 90-day stay he had imposed in April.
Trump Surrenders wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
It isn't policy. It's the law, and he has to break the law to stop the separations. He can do that, but it's a bad way to run the country. Still, in the absence of working laws, Trump is enforcing border security, so that part is good.
Trump and Kirstjen Nielsen’s embarrassing surrender on separating families at the border
I thought it was "the law" Gary? Was it "not the law" and just fascist immigration policy? Naaaaaahhhh!!! That couldn't possibly be it. Maybe Trump was "misunderstood" for the 5000th time?
Help me believe Gary!
Rigged's IQ=45 wrote:
U Stop it wrote:
Like ship said. Stop reading your right wing sources and then get back to me.
LOL ... the only thing the judge did was keep the 90 day stay they began in April. Stormy has to wait another month. Then onward with the lawsuit against Trump.
(Reuters) - A federal judge in Los Angeles has rejected a request by the adult film actress Stormy Daniels to restart her lawsuit there against U.S. President Donald Trump and his longtime lawyer Michael Cohen.
In an order dated Tuesday, U.S. District Judge James Otero said the amount of media attention in the case was not a sufficient reason to reconsider the 90-day stay he had imposed in April.
It's true. Rigged's IQ really does equal 45. It is just incredible the stupidity that he has repeatedly shown here.
///
Perhaps that's why he considered Giuliani to be such a genius. When your IQ is 45 someone with an IQ of 85 is going to look absolutely brilliant by comparison.
Racket wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Any agent who works for one of the alphabet organizations such as CIA, FBI, NSA, etc and is pulled from the field to be put into HR to push paper, has experienced career suicide and is that is a de facto punishment. In this case Strozk & Page ruined their FBI careers- they will NEVER move up the FBI ladder. The endgame here is that they will both be fired or resign their positions. Unfortunately, you are too dense to see this.
The IG found no political bias in the investigation. The reason they were reassigned to paper pushers probably had a lot to do with the fact they both carried on an extra-marital affair for quite some time.
Hilarious! They were not reassigned due to their affair. They taken off the case because Mueller was informed of their texts, which showed a clear bias, and he removed the two members from his team.
agip wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
< something stupid >
are you trolling me?
Of course he's trolling.
The only interesting question is whether he's actually political motivated or simply sadistic.
Republican Issue wrote:
Ahem, it is an issue Republicans created all by themselves. A wall is an ignorant idea. Red Texas will not stand for it. Why? Because you cannot build a wall along the border there. Why? Because the border is a fooking river.
You've never built a wall in a river? Or, maybe just declare eminent domain on all the homes bordering the river. How dare Trump's big government forcibly relocate American citizens!
Maybe just a gold plated wall in the middle of a hostile desert. No one has ever breached a wall. Not once!
If you put "American president wants to build wall" in a comedy, no one would laugh because it's unbelievable.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Racket wrote:
The IG found no political bias in the investigation. The reason they were reassigned to paper pushers probably had a lot to do with the fact they both carried on an extra-marital affair for quite some time.
Hilarious! They were not reassigned due to their affair. They taken off the case because Mueller was informed of their texts, which showed a clear bias, and he removed the two members from his team.
I guess the disconnect between us is that I don't really see the "clear bias" you claim exists but you are right he was removed from Mueller's team after the texts were released
How dumb are you libs to put any hope that a pornstar is going to get Trump indicted? How's that collusion working out for you? You libs are going down with your pied piper, Flagpole.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Republican Issue wrote:
Ahem, it is an issue Republicans created all by themselves. A wall is an ignorant idea. Red Texas will not stand for it. Why? Because you cannot build a wall along the border there. Why? Because the border is a fooking river.
You've never built a wall in a river? Or, maybe just declare eminent domain on all the homes bordering the river. How dare Trump's big government forcibly relocate American citizens!
Maybe just a gold plated wall in the middle of a hostile desert. No one has ever breached a wall. Not once!
If you put "American president wants to build wall" in a comedy, no one would laugh because it's unbelievable.
Exactly right. The border (Trump used the word boarder--he is a real estate guy) cannot be built down the middle of the Rio Grande. It has to go on the US side along the banks. In many place in Texas there are American homes the wall would have to cross through. Not just American owned property, but right through bedrooms and living rooms. Suddenly they nice river view that Texans have, and the fish they can catch from their yards, are gone. Meanwhile, Mexico has clean access to all the fish in the river, and more of the river water as well. Americans are cut off. It is no wonder that Texans are against a Trump wall in their state.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
It's True wrote:
It's true. Rigged's IQ really does equal 45. It is just incredible the stupidity that he has repeatedly shown here.
///
Perhaps that's why he considered Giuliani to be such a genius. When your IQ is 45 someone with an IQ of 85 is going to look absolutely brilliant by comparison.
How dumb are you libs to put any hope that a pornstar is going to get Trump indicted? How's that collusion working out for you? You libs are going down with your pied piper, Flagpole.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Hey, you don't need to convince me. I've already stated the fact that you are incredibly stupid. So why do you think you need to reinforce that fact?
You folks arguing about this insane child separation policy don't seem to have a clue as to Trump's real motivation here.
Here's a hint for you. Who is front and center for this official policy of child torture? Oh, that would be Jeff Sessions.
And who does Trump REALLY want to get rid of? Jeff Sessions again.
So who do you think is going to be the fall guy for Trump as he declares that he was NEVER behind this policy of systematic child abuse? Hmmmm . . . do I have to give you three guesses?
C'mon Y'all! wrote:
You folks arguing about this insane child separation policy don't seem to have a clue as to Trump's real motivation here.
Here's a hint for you. Who is front and center for this official policy of child torture? Oh, that would be Jeff Sessions.
And who does Trump REALLY want to get rid of? Jeff Sessions again.
So who do you think is going to be the fall guy for Trump as he declares that he was NEVER behind this policy of systematic child abuse? Hmmmm . . . do I have to give you three guesses?
The idea is the brainchild of Stephen Miller--one of Trump's most trusted policy aides; and a known racist--, not Sessions--also a known racist.
The democrat party is full of lunatics. You have liberal Hollywood mental cases like Peter Fonda, Rosie O'Donnell, Kathy Griffin, and Robert De Niro spewing nonsense & hate. Did you see Fonda's message today?
“We should rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if his mother will stand up against the giant a—hole she is married to...”
He probably gets a visit from the Secret Service.