Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

-15% wrote:

XY wrote:

RCP has him up to 44% approval rating now.

Gallup has him at 55% disapprove, 40% approve; a score of MINUS 15% for Trump.

Good call- always take one random poll from a poll of polls, and consider that as the truth. HA

The Doctor is in wrote:

This is worse than Watergate. Watergate was party vs party cheating.

Here, we have the United States intelligence community activity colluding with the establishment candidate and hurting the outsider.

This, after Hillary colluded with the FBI to avoid being indicted on her "matter". The crushed cell phones, deleted emails, and server that has never been confiscated/independently assessed is a non-story, apparently.

And this, after Hillary first colluded with the MSM to defeat Bernie. Thank you Ms Brazile for showing some dignity.

I actually agree with Clownpole here, that cheaters never win. The Epic Flagpole of 2016 proved that with 100% certainty.

https://nypost.com/2018/05/27/obamas-spying-scandal-is-starting-to-look-a-lot-like-watergate/

Hey Lying Gary, what's with the handle change? Wasn't 'Truthseakr' available to make a statement?

Oh, and the New York Post? Really?

.

.

.

Lying Gary

WWWWWH? wrote:

-15% wrote:

Gallup has him at 55% disapprove, 40% approve; a score of MINUS 15% for Trump.

Good call- always take one random poll from a poll of polls, and consider that as the truth. HA

Four of the primary RCP polls have Trump a greater than -10% for his approval score. Rasmussen is the outlier that has questions designed to heavily favor Trump , as it always is. Rasmussen, which Fox and Trump love, is not worthy of consideration as a poll.

Rasmussen Reports: Approve 49; Disapprove 50; Spread -1 (Outlier)

Harvard-Harris: Approve 45; Disapprove 55; Spread -10

Economist/YouGov: Approve 41; Disapprove 54; Spread -13

Reuters/Ipsos: Approve 47; Disapprove 51; Spread -4

Gallup: Approve 42; Disapprove 54; Spread -12

CBS News : Approve 40; Disapprove 55; Spread -15

CNN: Approve 44; Disapprove 51; Spread -7

Trumpettes are NOT Americans!

Democrats are the party of:

Christian haters

America haters

Baby killers

Police haters

Military haters

They do love queers and terrorists, however.

minus 9% wrote:

WWWWWH? wrote:

Good call- always take one random poll from a poll of polls, and consider that as the truth. HA

Four of the primary RCP polls have Trump a greater than -10% for his approval score. Rasmussen is the outlier that has questions designed to heavily favor Trump , as it always is. Rasmussen, which Fox and Trump love, is not worthy of consideration as a poll.

Rasmussen Reports: Approve 49; Disapprove 50; Spread -1 (Outlier)

Harvard-Harris: Approve 45; Disapprove 55; Spread -10

Economist/YouGov: Approve 41; Disapprove 54; Spread -13

Reuters/Ipsos: Approve 47; Disapprove 51; Spread -4

Gallup: Approve 42; Disapprove 54; Spread -12

CBS News : Approve 40; Disapprove 55; Spread -15

CNN: Approve 44; Disapprove 51; Spread -7

The -1 isn't an outlier. It's the best score, but not an outlier. Just as the -15 isn't an outlier.

The mean and median of this data set is 44. The mean difference is 8.9%.

For historical reference, Obama's average approval for his 8 years was 47%.

The point, however, is that there's no reason to take a single poll from a poll of polls, unless you're intentionally being biased (like Trump shows Rasmussen and the MSM shows the lowest polls).

Throw -1 (the one you prefer) and -15% (the one you dislike) out. You are left with -10, -13, -4, -12 and -7. Guess what the average of the "left"over values is? MINUS 9%.

WWWWWH? wrote:

The point, however, is that there's no reason to take a single poll from a poll of polls, unless you're intentionally being biased (like Trump shows Rasmussen and the MSM shows the lowest polls).

Hardloper, you never have a point. You have always been irrational. Your loved Rassumusen is a SINGLE poll. Your dreaded MSM is a YUGE number of polls.

Silliest of willies wrote:

They admitted to the spying, moran.

Who did what?

Trump's campaign officials up to the time they were hired from obscurity were active with hostile countries. Thank Devin Nunes for publishing that!

WWWWWH? wrote:

WWWWWH? wrote:

The point, however, is that there's no reason to take a single poll from a poll of polls, unless you're intentionally being biased (like Trump shows Rasmussen and the MSM shows the lowest polls).

Hardloper, you never have a point. You have always been irrational. Your loved Rassumusen is a SINGLE poll. Your dreaded MSM is a YUGE number of polls.

Boy you're dense. And you literally don't have a point in your post.

My point, of course, was as follows:

"...there's no reason to take a single poll from a poll of polls, unless you're intentionally being biased (like Trump shows Rasmussen and the MSM shows the lowest polls)."

Back in the February time frame for instance, Trump had been trending upward to around 42% average in the poll of polls, which he hadn't hit in quite a while. So what happens? CNN blasts out a "Trump's approval at new low (35%)". But the poll never even made it to the RCP poll of polls, and at the same time Rasmussen was like 45%. Trump countered with a tweet using the Rasmussen poll 45%, but his average was 42% at the time. Now even CNN has it at 44%.

middle'a'road wrote:

but I honestly think he's done some good for this country, economically, and I can just see it from people I know (and my own investments) that things are improving.

The economy has nothing to do with him at the moment. Presidential policy tends to lag a President for many years. So, right now, you can still thank Obama.

However, if Trump starts a trade war, that'll change. Not that he will because he's an all-talk idiot.

You have to wonder how much money he's made on the ZTE/make china great again thing.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

middle'a'road wrote:

but I honestly think he's done some good for this country, economically, and I can just see it from people I know (and my own investments) that things are improving.

The economy has nothing to do with him at the moment. Presidential policy tends to lag a President for many years. So, right now, you can still thank Obama.

However, if Trump starts a trade war, that'll change. Not that he will because he's an all-talk idiot.

You have to wonder how much money he's made on the ZTE/make china great again thing.

The direct conflict of interest is undeniable. How trumpers did not mind him not fully removing himself and family from business interests is beyond stupid. The money he has stood to gain from some of these underlying political transactions is just much for him not to want to provide favors.

middle'a'road wrote:

I just wanna know why Trump is called a liar a million times a day.

Because he's a liar who lies to anyone and then brags about it.

WWWWWH? wrote:

WWWWWH? wrote:

The point, however, is that there's no reason to take a single poll from a poll of polls, unless you're intentionally being biased (like Trump shows Rasmussen and the MSM shows the lowest polls).

Hardloper, you never have a point. You have always been irrational. Your loved Rassumusen is a SINGLE poll. Your dreaded MSM is a YUGE number of polls.

Boy I AM dense. And I literally don't have a point in MY post.

My point, of course, was as follows:

" "

Yes, a nothing-burger. My favourite.

1) The National debt is a real problem. How come the King of Debt has only added to the National debt in record numbers? Don't all the fiscal conservatives find a problem with this?

2) The last budget was a huge loss for Repubs. It was super expensive and contained many "liberal" gifts.

3) How does NK now have nuclear capability and enough cred to negotiate on the world stage?

4) Don't look now, but 2018 US national crime stats are starting to creep UP after many years of decline. Didn't the enforcer in Chief say that he was going to fix inner city crime "real fast"?

5) Since the new tax law, why hasn't the economy "taken off" like he said it would. Yes the economy is doing as well as it has done the last 8 years, but the market certainly hasn't.

6) Will the Warriors be offered a trip to the White House?

7) He said in one of his recent town halls that sections of Wall were being built right now. How come this isn't covered by any media?

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

middle'a'road wrote:

but I honestly think he's done some good for this country, economically, and I can just see it from people I know (and my own investments) that things are improving.

The economy has nothing to do with him at the moment. Presidential policy tends to lag a President for many years. So, right now, you can still thank Obama.

However, if Trump starts a trade war, that'll change. Not that he will because he's an all-talk idiot.

You have to wonder how much money he's made on the ZTE/make china great again thing.

You can thank Obama until there’s a downturn. At that time it will be Trump’s fault. If there is an upturn after that, of course it will be because of Obama again.

Liberal Econ at its finest.

1) it’s Obama’s economy, stupid. Try to keep up.

2) Again, it’s Obama’s economy.

3). Obama’s.

4) Obama.

5) Obsma’s Economy. Remember, there’s a lag. We’ll let you know when the lag is over.

6) if Obama was there, he would. That’s all he did during his Presidency- meet with every rev league champion in the country. Trump plays golf, Obama’s is a jock sniffer who wasted millions of tax payer dollars meeting with every freakin team.

7) Fox has, but they are biased.

ABC just cancelled the TV show Roseanne after the star made racists tweets. She is also an avid Trump supporter and pushes anti-Clinton conspiracy theories.

But you know what?

It's a good show.

It's been hailed as a show for middle America Trump supporters but the episodes are very liberal.

Her one grandson through her second daughter wants to be a girl and they are fine with that.

Hr eldest daughter was thinking about carrying a child for another couple.

Her son has an adopted black child.

There was an episode where Roseanne stood up for a Muslim woman who was being bashed by a young white cashier. She was initially sacred of her new Muslim neighbors and thought they were terrorists and then became friends with them.

It's a shame to see the show go away.

She was a modern day Archie Bunker.

She was generally the butt of the jokes with her narrow views.

L L wrote:

She was a modern day Archie Bunker.

O'Connor's own politics were liberal. He understood the Bunker character and played him not only with bombast and humor but with touches of vulnerability. The writing on the show was consistently left of center, but O'Connor often deftly skewered the liberal pieties of the day. Although Bunker was famous for his malapropisms of the English language, O'Connor was highly educated and cultured and was an English professor before he turned to acting.