You are pathetic wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Trump continues to bend his supporters over and have them grab their ankles.
Nice homophonic joke.
:rolleyes
Well, they say that Trump's election has emboldened the bigots in this country.
You are pathetic wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Trump continues to bend his supporters over and have them grab their ankles.
Nice homophonic joke.
:rolleyes
Well, they say that Trump's election has emboldened the bigots in this country.
You are pathetic wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Trump continues to bend his supporters over and have them grab their ankles.
Nice homophonic joke.
:rolleyes
Didn’t see any homophones.
ICE Snowflakes wrote:
Someone started a thread but some snowflake probably reported the post and it was deleted,
this guy resembles a lot of LRCers
https://heavy.com/news/2018/05/aaron-schlossberg/
Only in Trump's America is Freedom of Speech considered to be Freedom to Speak English.
You are pathetic wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Trump continues to bend his supporters over and have them grab their ankles.
Nice homophonic joke.
:rolleyes
Trump has you grabbing your ankles, AGAIN.
“So much is litigated in the media and it just gets repeated and retweeted without verification. You know, some people call it fake news. I refer to it as uninformed conjecture, speculation. And it’s dangerous because people think speculative opinion, wishful thinking, conclusions in search of evidence somehow rises to the level of facts.”
— Kellyanne Conway, interview on Fox News, May 17, 2018.
She is obviously speaking about the Mad Tweeter, Trump.
DiscoGary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
THAT is actually the first semi-intelligent thing you have ever posted here. A well-made point. I will admit to be surprised. Now, you should STILL go read it for yourself so that you don't have to take someone else's word for it, but as a debate point, you actually won that one...first time. Good going!
You're still dead wrong about Trump and your national and world view though.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Well thank you! Very nice of you to notice. Giving credit where credit is due is a big part of finding common ground.
Would it be rude to point out that the last time we disagreed on a major issue regarding Trump and I pointed out that your very own 13 questions pointed to a Trump win ... that your world view was wrong and mine was right.? After all, the only way to know which world view is right is to find out which one can predict outcomes. Mine has done so in a pretty dramatic fashion. So far, yours needs work.
If you could transfer some of that unshakable faith in Saint Mueller into a cycle of introspection and self correction, you'd be a serious intellectual badass, like me!
1) Word is still out on who was right about the election (if and when collusion[conspiracy] is proven, I will have been right.
2) Ah...you think I have unshakable faith in Mueller...this is not true. Where my faith is unshakable is that Trump is a criminal and has been most or all of his adult life. Mueller is just the one who is tasked with uncovering it. If Trump weren't SO criminal in SO many ways and SO incompetent, I would not be confident of Mueller's work...so again, my unshakable faith is in Trump's criminality, not Mueller's greatness (though I do believe he is great).
You are pathetic wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Trump continues to bend his supporters over and have them grab their ankles.
Nice homophonic joke.
:rolleyes
Can they not be women? This was an equal-opportunity comment, brother...basically meaning that Trump is f*cking anyone who supports him...because he is.
Flagpole wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Well thank you! Very nice of you to notice. Giving credit where credit is due is a big part of finding common ground.
Would it be rude to point out that the last time we disagreed on a major issue regarding Trump and I pointed out that your very own 13 questions pointed to a Trump win ... that your world view was wrong and mine was right.? After all, the only way to know which world view is right is to find out which one can predict outcomes. Mine has done so in a pretty dramatic fashion. So far, yours needs work.
If you could transfer some of that unshakable faith in Saint Mueller into a cycle of introspection and self correction, you'd be a serious intellectual badass, like me!
1) Word is still out on who was right about the election (if and when collusion[conspiracy] is proven, I will have been right.
2) Ah...you think I have unshakable faith in Mueller...this is not true. Where my faith is unshakable is that Trump is a criminal and has been most or all of his adult life. Mueller is just the one who is tasked with uncovering it. If Trump weren't SO criminal in SO many ways and SO incompetent, I would not be confident of Mueller's work...so again, my unshakable faith is in Trump's criminality, not Mueller's greatness (though I do believe he is great).
1) Is Hillary the POTUS? Then STFU. You were wrong.
Flagpole wrote:
You are pathetic wrote:
Nice homophonic joke.
:rolleyes
Can they not be women? This was an equal-opportunity comment, brother...basically meaning that Trump is f*cking anyone who supports him...because he is.
No. The joke you made has been historically used as a homophobic (homophonic not withstanding) slur. An attempt to belittle someone because of one's belief that being homosexual makes one inferior.
Sorry. No gray area on this one.
Are you drunk? wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) Word is still out on who was right about the election (if and when collusion[conspiracy] is proven, I will have been right.
2) Ah...you think I have unshakable faith in Mueller...this is not true. Where my faith is unshakable is that Trump is a criminal and has been most or all of his adult life. Mueller is just the one who is tasked with uncovering it. If Trump weren't SO criminal in SO many ways and SO incompetent, I would not be confident of Mueller's work...so again, my unshakable faith is in Trump's criminality, not Mueller's greatness (though I do believe he is great).
1) Is Hillary the POTUS? Then STFU. You were wrong.
My statement during the campaign was that Trump had ZERO chance to win. I qualified that with two things 1) that he didn't cheat in any way, and 2) that aliens didn't come down here and make us vote for him.
So, if cheating by Trump or his associates is proven, then I will have been right about the election, for cheaters can not be winners (see Olympians stripped of their medals after winning when caught cheating -- an example I provided during the run up to the election).
On the Bevel wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Can they not be women? This was an equal-opportunity comment, brother...basically meaning that Trump is f*cking anyone who supports him...because he is.
No. The joke you made has been historically used as a homophobic (homophonic not withstanding) slur. An attempt to belittle someone because of one's belief that being homosexual makes one inferior.
Sorry. No gray area on this one.
Nope. I reject that.
On the Bevel wrote:
Sorry. No gray area on this one.
You are obsessed with homosexuality. There is no gray area about this.
Flagpole wrote:
Are you drunk? wrote:
1) Is Hillary the POTUS? Then STFU. You were wrong.
My statement during the campaign was that Trump had ZERO chance to win. I qualified that with two things 1) that he didn't cheat in any way, and 2) that aliens didn't come down here and make us vote for him.
So, if cheating by Trump or his associates is proven, then I will have been right about the election, for cheaters can not be winners (see Olympians stripped of their medals after winning when caught cheating -- an example I provided during the run up to the election).
Nope. I reject that.
You don't handle rejection well.
History repeats itself:
Rich that ones being investigated have the gall to call for the investigation to end.
Now we have Giuliani saying that Mueller told him that he can't indict a sitting president.
Well...
1) It is doubtful that Mueller told him that. No verification from Mueller on that, and most who know Mueller have said they don't believe he would say that. So, we'll see on that one.
2) There are many who believe a sitting president CAN be indicted and that it would hold up when tested. The issue might be that there can't be a trial while the president is in office, but indictments could be made if for no other reason than to make sure a statute of limitations doesn't pass.
3) To be clear, I have long said that I don't believe Trump will spend time in jail...that is not how he is "done". Any one of these things or combinations of them could keep him from spending time in jail - Pardon, plea deal, the fact that the DOJ has an unwritten rule not to indict a sitting president.
4) It is a weird rule that you can't indict a sitting president. Basically that means the President is above the law. That shouldn't be the case.
Do continue to know...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole wrote:
On the Bevel wrote:
No. The joke you made has been historically used as a homophobic (homophonic not withstanding) slur. An attempt to belittle someone because of one's belief that being homosexual makes one inferior.
Sorry. No gray area on this one.
Nope. I reject that.
You can reject that all you want. Doesn't change the fact that you made an off-color homophobic joke.
Honshu wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
My statement during the campaign was that Trump had ZERO chance to win. I qualified that with two things 1) that he didn't cheat in any way, and 2) that aliens didn't come down here and make us vote for him.
So, if cheating by Trump or his associates is proven, then I will have been right about the election, for cheaters can not be winners (see Olympians stripped of their medals after winning when caught cheating -- an example I provided during the run up to the election).
Nope. I reject that.
Well, you would be wrong. I already set the criteria for my pronouncement in the lead up to the election.
Flagpole wrote:
Are you drunk? wrote:
1) Is Hillary the POTUS? Then STFU. You were wrong.
My statement during the campaign was that Trump had ZERO chance to win. I qualified that with two things 1) that he didn't cheat in any way, and 2) that aliens didn't come down here and make us vote for him.
So, if cheating by Trump or his associates is proven, then I will have been right about the election, for cheaters can not be winners (see Olympians stripped of their medals after winning when caught cheating -- an example I provided during the run up to the election).
HAHAHAHAHA!! He's STILL TALKING!!
Good lord, man, get a grip and find some hobbies. You were wrong about the election. Now you're wrong about Mueller taking Trump down. Just stop, log off, and go away for a long, long time.
This is THE reason people can't stand Liberals- You're SO stubborn. You can't admit you don't know what you're talking about, so you continue to double, triple, quadruple down. It is literally the definition of insanity. You're not going to change reality by posting more.
Needless to say at this point, but:
Mueller never (per ROBERT MUELLER himself).
Clownpole forever (per the actions of Clownpole himself).
On the Bevel wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Nope. I reject that.
You can reject that all you want. Doesn't change the fact that you made an off-color homophobic joke.
^Nothing burger
Roger Dodger wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
My statement during the campaign was that Trump had ZERO chance to win. I qualified that with two things 1) that he didn't cheat in any way, and 2) that aliens didn't come down here and make us vote for him.
So, if cheating by Trump or his associates is proven, then I will have been right about the election, for cheaters can not be winners (see Olympians stripped of their medals after winning when caught cheating -- an example I provided during the run up to the election).
HAHAHAHAHA!! He's STILL TALKING!!
Good lord, man, get a grip and find some hobbies. You were wrong about the election. Now you're wrong about Mueller taking Trump down. Just stop, log off, and go away for a long, long time.
This is THE reason people can't stand Liberals- You're SO stubborn. You can't admit you don't know what you're talking about, so you continue to double, triple, quadruple down. It is literally the definition of insanity. You're not going to change reality by posting more.
Needless to say at this point, but:
Mueller never (per ROBERT MUELLER himself).
Clownpole forever (per the actions of Clownpole himself).
^Nothing of substance as usual. Flagpole is going to own this message board.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Chinese Half-Marathon Champion Is Disqualified—Along With Runners Who Let Him Win