Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Every time you post some unproven conspiracy allegation as fact you lose credibility. Why do you continue to post this crap as some kind of proven fact?

Flagpole wrote:

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

Yes, we all know this. But only one party has been self-righteously lecturing the country about the Bible, the sanctity of marriage, and Family Values (TM) for the last 40 years. Trump's affairs don't disqualify him from the Presidency (although paying bribes to cover them up might), but they do prove that the right-wing Evangelical voting bloc has always been completely insincere when it comes to promoting its holier-than-thou theocratic BS.

CORRECT!

Incorrect!!

Trump never ran on that platform. He never passed himself off as a "Bible Thumper" as perhaps George W Bush did. Trump was never a Tea Party guy either. Trump ran on a "America First" platform which was contrary to the leadership & beliefs of McCain, McConnell and soon to be former Speaker Ryan which in turn deeply upset the rank & file GOP/Globalist establishment.

You cannot paint Trump as just like the rest of the regular establishment GOP types or evangelicals. That doesn't work. Like it or not, Trump is his own new brand of GOP.

XY wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

And yet Trump took responsibility for all 5 of his kids. How about your hero, Bubba? He has an out-of-wedlock son with a black woman, whom he NEVER supported financially. It is a story that the MSM buried years ago. Bill continues to refuse to provide a DNA sample.

Mueller is never ever coming

Trump isn't going away

A Flagpolian Flop is on the way

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3910688/Danney-Williams-calls-Barack-Obama-help-Bill-Clinton-s-DNA.html

Every time you post some unproven conspiracy allegation as fact you lose credibility. Why do you continue to post this crap as some kind of proven fact?

Senator Lie-a-watha Warren refused a DNA test to prove she is Cherokee. You believe her crap. You have just as much credibility as I do.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Trump ran on a "America First" platform...

Hahahahahahahahhahaha, ROFLOL, hahahhahhahahahahaha . . .

You have been duped by Don "The Criminal Con" Trump. Trump ran on a "Me First" platform. get your facts straight, fool.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

CORRECT!

Incorrect!!

Trump never ran on that platform. He never passed himself off as a "Bible Thumper" as perhaps George W Bush did. Trump was never a Tea Party guy either. Trump ran on a "America First" platform which was contrary to the leadership & beliefs of McCain, McConnell and soon to be former Speaker Ryan which in turn deeply upset the rank & file GOP/Globalist establishment.

You cannot paint Trump as just like the rest of the regular establishment GOP types or evangelicals. That doesn't work. Like it or not, Trump is his own new brand of GOP.

Dude, he spoke at many "Christian" colleges, including at Liberty University for his infamous "Two Corinthians" comment, and he has constantly called himself a Christian and panders to the Christian Right. Good grief man, do you ever read anything? "And we're bringing back 'Merry Christmas'". He said that a million times during the campaign. Who was that for? Wasn't for the atheists and Muslims here.

Go to YouTube, you can see all kinds of videos of Trump saying things like "We will defend our Christian heritage", and arguing with the Pope about the fact that he IS a Christian, and on and on.

BUT, once again you are missing the point (really, try harder to understand things told to you). It is the Christian Right who are hypocrites for supporting Trump...doesn't matter if he calls himself a Christian or not (he does). They should look at his behavior and not his labels of Republican and Christian and decide if they should support him. No Christian who REALLY espouses Christian values would.

I agree that Trump is a new brand of GOP...HUGE a$$hole, liar, and criminal. The old GOP was way more respectable.

I gotta go be cool somewhere, but just in case you didn't know...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Talk about pandering. Hillary also spoke about her faith during the campaign. Yet you overlook her behavior. She treated staff & her Secret Service detail with foul language on a daily basis. She was the very personification of a bully and you voted for her. Her behavior was and is deplorable.

You don't have a corner of righteousness with your arguments. You have this insatiable need to post like a you need a drug fix every few minutes.

You will be proven a clown in the end. You will flop bigly.

Flagpole wrote:

I gotta go be cool somewhere, but just in case you didn't know...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Nope. Your name will be ridiculed forever.

Clownpole is your future, it's your destiny.

M.A.G.A!!!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Talk about pandering. Hillary also spoke about her faith during the campaign. Yet you overlook her behavior. She treated staff & her Secret Service detail with foul language on a daily basis. She was the very personification of a bully and you voted for her. Her behavior was and is deplorable.

This just posted on Buzzfeed: It's 2018.

Go back to the hive mind for a new bogeyman.

18th months and 1000 pages later Trumpers are still obsessed with Hillary.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Talk about pandering. Hillary also spoke about her faith during the campaign. Yet you overlook her behavior. She treated staff & her Secret Service detail with foul language on a daily basis. She was the very personification of a bully and you voted for her. Her behavior was and is deplorable.

This just posted on Buzzfeed: It's 2018.

Go back to the hive mind for a new bogeyman.

Several news sources long ago posted this and she's still a bad person in 2018. Buzzfeed ain't my thang, poppy.

infrequent contributer wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Talk about pandering. Hillary also spoke about her faith during the campaign. Yet you overlook her behavior. She treated staff & her Secret Service detail with foul language on a daily basis. She was the very personification of a bully and you voted for her. Her behavior was and is deplorable.

You don't have a corner of righteousness with your arguments. You have this insatiable need to post like a you need a drug fix every few minutes.

You will be proven a clown in the end. You will flop bigly.

18th months and 1000 pages later Trumpers are still obsessed with Hillary.

Right back at ya. And you're still obsessed with this whole "Trump just had to do something criminal to steal the election" thing.

I said evangelicals, not Christians.

Evangelicals hold the moral high ground on marital relations and support candidates based on this view.

So, I don't expect them to support Bill Clinton.

But why do they support Trump?

L L wrote:

I said evangelicals, not Christians.

Evangelicals hold the moral high ground on marital relations and support candidates based on this view.

So, I don't expect them to support Bill Clinton.

But why do they support Trump?

I think you are arguing semantics here. I put evangelicals & Christians in the same category. Perhaps you should just call it the "Religious Right," if that's the correct term.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

L L wrote:

I said evangelicals, not Christians.

Evangelicals hold the moral high ground on marital relations and support candidates based on this view.

So, I don't expect them to support Bill Clinton.

But why do they support Trump?

I think you are arguing semantics here. I put evangelicals & Christians in the same category. Perhaps you should just call it the "Religious Right," if that's the correct term.

Both of you aren't quite right.

Evangelicals can be liberals. I know several. Christians can be conservative or liberal.

Christian Right are NOT liberal, and not all of them are Evangelicals.

Evangelical simply means you spread the word of God. That word is misused all the time to mean conservative Christians, but it does not mean that.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

L L wrote:

I said evangelicals, not Christians.

Evangelicals hold the moral high ground on marital relations and support candidates based on this view.

So, I don't expect them to support Bill Clinton.

But why do they support Trump?

I think you are arguing semantics here. I put evangelicals & Christians in the same category. Perhaps you should just call it the "Religious Right," if that's the correct term.

Enjoy!

4U2 Read wrote:

Enjoy!

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/24/us/politics/trump-evangelicals-midterm-elections.html

Enjoy this:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

XY wrote:

Every time you post some unproven conspiracy allegation as fact you lose credibility. Why do you continue to post this crap as some kind of proven fact?

Senator Lie-a-watha Warren refused a DNA test to prove she is Cherokee. You believe her crap. You have just as much credibility as I do.

Except that XY never posted that Senator Warren is part Cherokee.

Whereas YOU posted " He has an out-of-wedlock son with a black woman, whom he NEVER supported financially."

Do you see the difference?

Here, let me explain it to you using small words so that you might be able to understand.

1) YOU were called out on your LIE (Clinton's supposed black son).

2) YOU responded by LYING again (claim that XY believes her Cherokee-ness).

- - -

Compare to:

1) XY did NOT lie about Senator Warren.

2) XY did NOT lie in calling out your Clinton lie.

///

In summary:

You = LIAR

XY = NOT Liar

Is that simple enough for you to understand?

Flagpole wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

I think you are arguing semantics here. I put evangelicals & Christians in the same category. Perhaps you should just call it the "Religious Right," if that's the correct term.

Both of you aren't quite right.

Evangelicals can be liberals. I know several. Christians can be conservative or liberal.

Christian Right are NOT liberal, and not all of them are Evangelicals.

Evangelical simply means you spread the word of God. That word is misused all the time to mean conservative Christians, but it does not mean that.

I started this using the term evangelicals for a reason.

There are over 100 million christians in the US.

It is the majority belief.

Evangelicals are a minority and they judge others based on their morality.

They lean way right but can't protest someone like Obama even if they don't vote for him.

Sure, they can protest Bill Clinton. That makes sense.

But why do they back Trump?