Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ouch!

PIO! wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

. . .

3) Not sure if CNN or MSNBC will tell this story or not...I would expect that they will investigate it and see if it has merits before spending much time on it. So, since you called Maddow a "boy", I guess you are homophobic too. Nice.

That's the thing with the Trumpettes. Pretty much all of them. They are fundamentally driven by homophobia, racism and bigotry. And they are enraged when people point it out. But every once in a while they are not so careful about what they type (say) and their foundational bigotry comes through loud and clear.

///

That's why Lying Gary invented "truthseakr" - to say blatantly racist things while trying to pretend it wasn't him.

May be of interest.

You donk wrote:

Here's a new one from just TODAY: "Hillary Clinton Campaing Illegally Laundered $84 million."

http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/24/bombshell-fec-records-indicate-hillary-campaign-illegally-laundered-84-million/

Flagpole says "respecting the rule of law." -- Except if their Democrat Socialists.

When in doubt, change the subject to something Clinton-related.

Gotta love when Republicans pretend to get mad about questionable campaign financing tactics. You guys WANT monied interests to be able bribe politicians, remember? Corporations are people! Money is speech! You went to great lengths to make it as easy as possible. In fact, you created the loopholes in campaign finance law that the Clinton campaign was able to exploit!

If Clinton's campaign broke the finance laws, then let's look into it and punish them. But if we're going to do that, we also need to look at campaign finance violations committed by the Trump campaign and strongly consider reforming our campaign finance laws to prevent corruption in the future (repealing McCutcheon and Citizen's United would be a great start). Agreed?

P.S.- Who funds The Federalist? I say Russian Oligarchs. Prove me wrong.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

You donk wrote:

Everyone (even you) knows that the Clinton's .

Who? That's all ancient history.

You guys and your propaganda sites are hilarious. You need a new bogeyman.

Yeaahhhh, seriously... WE need a new boogeymaaaannnnn... LOL

"You liberals and your Fredocon lackeys need to get this through your heads. You are not purging this guy. He’s purging you. Just look at James Comey, who has gone from Tower of Integrity to Looming Doofus. The winding trail from the bottom of that famous escalator to right here and now is littered with the twitching bodies of those who thought they could take on The Donald and win."

VLAN wrote:

Hillary Clinton could slaughter a family of puppies and Democrat Socialists wouldn't care. Such is their hatred of Donald Trump.

NOTE: I was going to use babies, but we all know that Dems wouldn't be too upset about that. Puppies, though, are a different story.

Trump could have multiple wives and multiple affairs and pay women off and evangelicals wouldn't care.

They would still support him as long as he says he's a Republican.

Boogeyboogey wrote:

You are not purging this guy.

That's you believing reasonable people are walking around trying to reverse time. Which, fits with the Clinton fetish. That is all old news. Gone. Done. Over.

Boogeyboogey wrote:

He’s purging you.

What does this mean?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:

So if we wanted to treat this in a nonpartisan way, first we would ask, "How common is it for these mortgages to be replaced with loans? How common is it for the HUD secretary to allow conversion of rentals into condos?"

One of my rental properties was also a condo conversion- I guess I'm a much smaller scale Hannity w/o a TV/radio empire.

HUD Secretaries have nothing to do with condo conversions- you know this. Don't play dumb.

Don't get me wrong; I agree with you. Didn't mean to suggest that the HUD secretary was involved in these decisions on an individual basis. There is no reason to think that just because something positive happens for Hannity means that government officials are engaged in a conspiracy for his benefit.

L L wrote:

VLAN wrote:

Hillary Clinton could slaughter a family of puppies and Democrat Socialists wouldn't care. Such is their hatred of Donald Trump.

NOTE: I was going to use babies, but we all know that Dems wouldn't be too upset about that. Puppies, though, are a different story.

Trump could have multiple wives and multiple affairs and pay women off and evangelicals wouldn't care.

They would still support him as long as he says he's a Republican.

Trump has had 3 wives and 5 (known) children from them, plus there is a story that he possibly fathered a child with his housekeeper. Nice. Add that fact that he's Mr. "Two Corinthians" and it is crystal clear he is not a Christian...certainly not a practicing one or one with any deep meaning of the religion. It is absolutely ridiculous for Christians to still back them as they do. Makes no sense whatsoever...other than to say that their politics are way more important than their religion.

Here's a thought for the Christians -- ones that for sure Trump has violated:

*Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain

*Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy

*Honor thy father and thy mother - Trump had big issues with his mother and lied to Forbes magazine that basically all of his dad's wealth had been transferred to him...not really respecting his dad there.

*Thou shalt not commit adultery

*Thou shalt not steal

*Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor

*Thou shalt not covet

Note that being gay is not in the Ten Commandments.

Anyone who calls themself a Christian and yet supports Donald Trump is a hypocrite.

L L wrote:

VLAN wrote:

Hillary Clinton could slaughter a family of puppies and Democrat Socialists wouldn't care. Such is their hatred of Donald Trump.

NOTE: I was going to use babies, but we all know that Dems wouldn't be too upset about that. Puppies, though, are a different story.

Trump could have multiple wives and multiple affairs and pay women off and evangelicals wouldn't care.

They would still support him as long as he says he's a Republican.

Bill Clinton had numerous affairs cheating on Hillary when he was Gov. of Arksans and continued all through his 8 years in the White House. Everybody knows that his marriage is a sham anyway- I severely doubt he's shared a bed with Hillary since he was living in Arkansas. And the MSM didn't have that much of a problem with it. Remember when they told us "it's just about sex and not your business?" Bill Clinton lied about having a years-long affair with Gennifer Flowers and you were absolutely fine with that.

And now all of a sudden you want to pretend extramarital affairs disqualifies a guy from being President or something? We all knew Trump cheated and bedded Playboy Playmates, etc. Almost every POTUS cheated on their wives.

The point is that many Christians (not all) look the other way on Trump and his transgressions. Bill Clinton didn't have wide sweeping support from the Christian right. So, adultery doesn't make B. Clinton right and D. Trump wrong. It just makes those Christians who support D. Trump hypocrites. We aren't talking about OUR view of Clinton and Trump...we are talking about the Christian Right view. Again, hypocrites all of them who support Trump.

And yet Trump took responsibility for all 5 of his kids. How about your hero, Bubba? He has an out-of-wedlock son with a black woman, whom he NEVER supported financially. It is a story that the MSM buried years ago. Bill continues to refuse to provide a DNA sample.

Mueller is never ever coming

Trump isn't going away

A Flagpolian Flop is on the way

Christians can be liberal too. Your argument fails.

Count Chocula wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

One of my rental properties was also a condo conversion- I guess I'm a much smaller scale Hannity w/o a TV/radio empire.

HUD Secretaries have nothing to do with condo conversions- you know this. Don't play dumb.

Don't get me wrong; I agree with you. Didn't mean to suggest that the HUD secretary was involved in these decisions on an individual basis. There is no reason to think that just because something positive happens for Hannity means that government officials are engaged in a conspiracy for his benefit.

Thanks, no argument, we are in agreement.

Good grief dude.

1) Doesn't matter what Bill Clinton did or didn't do. He is not the President, and what he did or didn't do has no bearing on Trump.

2) The story has been shown to be "unproven" and even has a DNA test that showed that Clinton was not the father (Clinton DID give the DNA) -

3) Trump's fatherhood is bad and has always been. Yes, he has supported them all financially, but even he admits he was an absent father to all of them.

4) We still have the outstanding story that it is possible Trump has fathered a child with a former housekeeper. So, we will see if we ever hear more about that.

5) But, I quit supporting Bill Clinton as a politician and a person years ago, and I quit being his supporter on way less than you are suggesting. For some reason you believe I support Democrats no matter what they do, and that is not true. I have no allegiance to Party or politicians, only truth and justice.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

And now all of a sudden you want to pretend extramarital affairs disqualifies a guy from being President or something? We all knew Trump cheated and bedded Playboy Playmates, etc. Almost every POTUS cheated on their wives.

Yes, we all know this. But only one party has been self-righteously lecturing the country about the Bible, the sanctity of marriage, and Family Values (TM) for the last 40 years. Trump's affairs don't disqualify him from the Presidency (although paying bribes to cover them up might), but they do prove that the right-wing Evangelical voting bloc has always been completely insincere when it comes to promoting its holier-than-thou theocratic BS.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

The point is that many Christians (not all) look the other way on Trump and his transgressions. Bill Clinton didn't have wide sweeping support from the Christian right. So, adultery doesn't make B. Clinton right and D. Trump wrong. It just makes those Christians who support D. Trump hypocrites. We aren't talking about OUR view of Clinton and Trump...we are talking about the Christian Right view. Again, hypocrites all of them who support Trump.

Christians can be liberal too. Your argument fails.

That's why my first reference says "(not all)" and then I specifically later wrote "Christian right".

So, YOUR argument fails.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole wrote:

. . .

5) But, I quit supporting Bill Clinton as a politician and a person years ago, and I quit being his supporter on way less than you are suggesting. For some reason you believe I support Democrats no matter what they do, and that is not true. I have no allegiance to Party or politicians, only truth and justice.

. . .

You forgot, "and the American Way!"

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

And now all of a sudden you want to pretend extramarital affairs disqualifies a guy from being President or something? We all knew Trump cheated and bedded Playboy Playmates, etc. Almost every POTUS cheated on their wives.

Yes, we all know this. But only one party has been self-righteously lecturing the country about the Bible, the sanctity of marriage, and Family Values (TM) for the last 40 years. Trump's affairs don't disqualify him from the Presidency (although paying bribes to cover them up might), but they do prove that the right-wing Evangelical voting bloc has always been completely insincere when it comes to promoting its holier-than-thou theocratic BS.

EXACTLY!

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

And now all of a sudden you want to pretend extramarital affairs disqualifies a guy from being President or something? We all knew Trump cheated and bedded Playboy Playmates, etc. Almost every POTUS cheated on their wives.

Yes, we all know this. But only one party has been self-righteously lecturing the country about the Bible, the sanctity of marriage, and Family Values (TM) for the last 40 years. Trump's affairs don't disqualify him from the Presidency (although paying bribes to cover them up might), but they do prove that the right-wing Evangelical voting bloc has always been completely insincere when it comes to promoting its holier-than-thou theocratic BS.

CORRECT!