Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

credit-free wrote:

credit-free wrote:

[quote]Rigged for Hillary wrote:

You are one dumb Trumper.

But, I will admit that the Clinton's took it to another level, they really were thieves.

Wrong, handle thief. What I will admit is that you are one of the well known Trumpers who "never" posts on this thread. Either Jamin or Hardloper.

Fat hurts wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Cohen's third client is Sean Hannity.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/16/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-refuses-to-identify-clients-as-court-faceoff-looms.html

OMG. I couldn't have picked a more perfect person for the mystery client. This is priceless.

No wonder Hannity went nuclear on his show the other day.

That is precious, great work. May they all fry together

credit-free wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Yep, he's sooooooo poor that he doesn't take a presidential paycheck. His credit cards must be maxed out, his company is going under and laying off the workforce, his two grown sons are unemployed, the banks are foreclosing on all his properties. Mar a Lago is going broke. Trump Tower residents are forced to vacate. The bank took possession of the company helicopter.

Do you Trump haters just like to spout BS all day? Give it a rest.

You are one dumb dummy. The reason Trump uses his businesses for food, travel, etc,, is so he DOESN'T have to pay. Are you really dumb enough to believe that Trump pays for meals, and rooms, at his businesses using a credit card? Or, that he pays rent, or for utilities, at Trump Tower? You are one dumb Trumper.

As a commercial property owner and multiple residential property owner- I understand how to run and manage a RE business. Trump has many MBA's on his payroll who handle the day to day transactions, disburse funds, Accounts Receivables, etc. The endless "Trump is broke" is wishful thinking on your part.

Mueller is never ever coming

Clownpole is flopping bigly

credit-free wrote:

credit-free wrote:

But, I will admit that the Clinton's took it to another level, they really were thieves.

Wrong, handle thief. What I will admit is that you are one of the well known Trumpers who "never" posts on this thread. Either Jamin or Hardloper.

No, it really was me. I believe the Clintons are HUGE crooks and I think even Flagpole would have to admit that. To let them off so easily is criminal. Trump is NOT perfect, but he's way better than the corrupt Clinton family. Who would vote for the wife of a President who did such vile things while in office, he was impeached. Sorry, just wanted to be clear.

Trollminator wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

OMG. I couldn't have picked a more perfect person for the mystery client. This is priceless.

No wonder Hannity went nuclear on his show the other day.

That is precious, great work. May they all fry together

Like Obama the King of Lying to the American People?

credit-free {Hardloper the handle thief] wrote:

credit-free wrote:

Wrong, handle thief. What I will admit is that you are one of the well known Trumpers who "never" posts on this thread. Either Jamin or .

It really was me, Hardloper.

Yes.

The comey family are hillary lovers!!!!

Wow! The comey women are some gross looking sea hags!!!!

http://www.informationliberation.com/files/comey-family-supported-hillary-womens-march.jpg

Fat hurts wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?

Whenever the news is too bad for Trump, you can always count on Gary to yell, "Hillary!!!!".

No, no, no. He does have options.

"The Maze"

"Deep State"

and yes,

"Hillary!!!!"

Other Options wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Whenever the news is too bad for Trump, you can always count on Gary to yell, "Hillary!!!!".

No, no, no. He does have options.

"The Maze" = Where Trumpers live

"Deep State" = Run by Trump

and yes,

"Hillary!!!!" = Not the President

PIO! wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Wait, let me see if I've got this straight. So, nobody who voted for Clinton has any credibility? Only Trump voters have credibility?

Does that sound like the foundation of America to you? Or the foundation of something else?

Let me get this straight. Isn't that what you liberal flippers do with everything the Right throws at you? Yes, why yes it is. You are the main reason this thread has no credibility and very little value. You're quite ignorant on politics.

^^^^this is me yelling at myself as I realize what a douche bag I've been.

In other words, you've got nothing but that oh-so-imopressive trolling tactic of stealing handles.

Most impressive!

Doe Nate wrote:

Reasonable Republican wrote:

If Trump is broke why did he put up millions of dollars in self financing for his campaign. He is also donating his $400,000 yearly salary from being president to charity. These don’t sound like the actions of someone who is broke.

You cannot legal donate a salary you do not take. What Trump is doing is not taking a $0 salary and then deducting the full salary as a donation.

Trump did not put one cent of his personal money into the campaign. He used money from his businesses as "loans" that would be paid back to him. And he used campaign donations to claim "self=financed". In other words, he did not self-finance his campaign.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/10/donald-trump/donald-trump-self-funding-his-campaign-sort/

Oh Snap!

Fat hurts wrote:

Possible, but I think that's unlikely. What lawyer turns down a huge payday just because he's afraid his client won't listen?

Even if a few good attorneys turned him down because of his proclivities, that still leaves a lot of really great legal talent that would do the job just for the money.

He's a terrible client. Not manageable, not bad, terrible. Only an idiot would wade into that quicksand. Assuming Trump would pay, and that's a reach, money is not the issue.

Changing topics:

Broadband advisor picked by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai arrested on fraud charges

What happened? Where is "the swamp" draining? Welcome to the world of politics!

[quote]credit-free wrote:

No, it really was me. I believe the Clintons are HUGE crooks and I think even Flagpole would have to admit that. To let them off so easily is criminal. /quote]

I see you are trying the "compared to terrible X, Y is better." BS.

You guys need new material.

I know history and facts are a challenge, but Ken Starr worked a very bigly time to get a couple of minor charges.

They are smarter than the Chief Idiot. I know that hurts you a little... It's okay. We can't all be winners.

Your entire premise isn't based on one single fact its all assumptions that you connect to your final conclusion that Trump is poor.

Also according to you guys Trump doesn't pay taxes how could someone that doesn't pay federal taxes be broke? You guys need to make up your minds.

We are Iibtards and we are always right. Even if we can't make up our minds. We hate Trump, that is reason enough.

Oops! My bigly bad. Trump is a billionaire but he is cash poor. Now I get it. I feel like a total retard now.

There really are only two reasons that Trump can't hire top flight lawyers:

1) He can't afford the likely HUGE retainer (needed because he has a history of stiffing people and banks to the point that US banks will not loan him money any more.

2) They know that he doesn't typically listen to the advice given to him by counsel, and they don't want to have their job tainted by a client who doesn't listen to them.

So, is #1 out of bounds? Not necessarily. You can have a big net worth and not necessarily have big cash flow. Could he sell some properties or lay off employees to try to get some money? Perhaps...but he says he loves debt, so for all we know all of his properties have money borrowed against them. Also, a fire sale might not be the optics he wants. It is pretty clear he's not the best businessman on the planet, and his financial woes could very possibly be why he is under the thumb of Russia and Putin. Time will tell.

It is #1. Many top lawyers will accept #2 as long as they get paid a retainer. In Trump's case the retainer asked for is likely more the $1 million.

Flagpole wrote:

There really are only two reasons that Trump can't hire top flight lawyers:

1) He can't afford the likely HUGE retainer (needed because he has a history of stiffing people and banks to the point that US banks will not loan him money any more.

2) They know that he doesn't typically listen to the advice given to him by counsel, and they don't want to have their job tainted by a client who doesn't listen to them.

So, is #1 out of bounds? Not necessarily. You can have a big net worth and not necessarily have big cash flow. Could he sell some properties or lay off employees to try to get some money?

Surprising no one but Briedbard bots, "the swamp" has opened several new locations, all of them Trump-branded.

His properties are raking in the cash right now.