Just wondering, as that's how I like to roll. No one's said anything but you never know what they're thinking.
Just wondering, as that's how I like to roll. No one's said anything but you never know what they're thinking.
Unless there is a noticeable bulge visible from more than a few feet away, who the hell cares?
That's what I'd think, but there's this whole "gotta wear shorts over the tights" thing going around.
Pics?
serious answer: I've never understood this issue with needing to wear shorts over tights. If you arrange your junk in a central location instead of an obvious outline of genitalia off to one side, and hold your package together with running briefs underneath, then it's just a non-offensive bulge. Men have them, no matter what they wear. It's only gross or offensive when you can see an actual outline of the parts.
As a female runner, I have to say to you guys NOT to do this unless you want to look like a pixie.
really.... wrote:
serious answer: I've never understood this issue with needing to wear shorts over tights. If you arrange your junk in a central location instead of an obvious outline of genitalia off to one side, and hold your package together with running briefs underneath, then it's just a non-offensive bulge. Men have them, no matter what they wear. It's only gross or offensive when you can see an actual outline of the parts.
^This
Not wow... wrote:
As a female runner, I have to say to you guys NOT to do this unless you want to look like a pixie.
I'm married so I don't really care about that. I just don't want to look creepy.
Just wow.... wrote:
Just wondering, as that's how I like to roll. No one's said anything but you never know what they're thinking.
I see plenty of guys running around in just running tights. Here are the pre-requisites in my opinion:
1. You are fit enough to pull it off. If you have a little bit of chub on you (like I do) throw a pair of shorts over them. It isn't flattering to be busting out of them.
2. If you are particularly well endowed you may need shorts over them. If you can't hide the outline cover it up.
Since you are planning on covering them up with a long jacket I say wear the tights if you like them.
If all the dudes you hang with like to peek, they may be disappointed.
I would go with the crop top if I was you.
It's acceptable if it doesn't. The only people who think anything will be jealous.
Just wow.... wrote:
Just wondering, as that's how I like to roll. No one's said anything but you never know what they're thinking.
In my whole life I have seen one maybe two guy[s] running around with shorts over his/ their tights. No pretty sight, at all.
Everybody in a radius of 100 meters around them was trying to keep from laughing out loud. Some needed tissues to wipe the tears from their eyes. It was really embarrassing, seeing these fairies prancing around in their shorts.
Just wear the tights. I know I do. Looks great with a black, slim fitting long sleeve. I even tuck them behind my gloves that are in my waist band. Only looks I get are from people of all ages, sexes and genders admiring both my body and my effortless stride. Not kidding or bragging either. Just saying :)
Not wow... wrote:
As a female runner, I have to say to you guys NOT to do this unless you want to look like a pixie.
Really? Even if that was true, why should I care what some buttcap thinks?
Since when do scrawny distance runners concern themselves with being socially acceptable? C'mon man. You've gotta be used to strange stares, snickering and cold shoulders by now.
black tights with a long shirt or jacket is what I do on winter runs. No one is gonna see your junk as you run down the road. I would not go to the grocery store wearing the tights, but being outside and moving while not being close to anyone for more than a brief moment provides enough privacy. If you feel exposed, just run faster:)
Why should I care what a fat dog thinks??
I will not run with someone who puts shorts over their tights. Made a guy lose the shorts a couple weeks ago actually. It isnt a terrible thing but it shows you've never been an actual competitive runner in your life. Show up to a D1 practice with shorts over your tights once and see how it goes.
Any chick who is looking for dudes with shorts over their tights is likely a heffer looking for other heffers.
really.... wrote:
serious answer: I've never understood this issue with needing to wear shorts over tights. If you arrange your junk in a central location instead of an obvious outline of genitalia off to one side, and hold your package together with running briefs underneath, then it's just a non-offensive bulge. Men have them, no matter what they wear. It's only gross or offensive when you can see an actual outline of the parts.
I always wore running shorts underneath the tights. That is the correct and only way.
/thread.
Who gives a F*CK about people seeing your bulge through your pants. Don't be a pu**y, wear whatever you want.
dial it up wrote:
It isnt a terrible thing but it shows you've never been an actual competitive runner in your life. Show up to a D1 practice with shorts over your tights once and see how it goes.
I did this, and then continued to wear shorts over tights on occasion for four years to spite teammates like you. Sometimes I was more comfortable with the additional layer over my junk and I didn't like the feel of extra spandex under my tights. Not sure why that bothered people. Placing looks over performance to any degree is a sign of mental fragility.