Should economically-deprived regions be deprived of energy if it is fossil-based?
Should economically-deprived regions be deprived of energy if it is fossil-based?
Red Hat Warrior wrote:
Should economically-deprived regions be deprived of energy if it is fossil-based?
I’ve just been writing about that very subject - part of my article:
“The recent much acclaimed Paris Agreement on reducing carbon emissions is a joke, giving ’emerging nations’ a blank cheque.
And, stretching the expression ‘emerging’ to barely credible limits, Japan, who would die for our coal reserves, has chosen that form of generation after their nuclear shut down, 46 new plants building or in the planning stage.
China the main emission ‘villain’ has made a token nod to renewables, but despite an overcapacity, is still building (more efficient) new coal power plans and not generally realised, is also building coal powered plants in 27 other countries, the 14 along the Vietnamese coast being one example.
Indonesia with huge coal reserves is increasing its consumption and is in the process of constructing 117 new coal power plants throughout the archipelago.
India, with over 300 million without access to electricity, is in no mood to mess about, opening two new coal mines each month, aiming for a billion tonnes excavated yearly by 2020. 65 GW of new coal plant is under construction right now and if their aim of 300 GW new production by 2030 is achieved - nearly 600 new coal plants would be required.
Closer to home, Turkey plans to build as many as 80 new coal plants in the next few years on top of the 25 that already exist.â€
You, sir, should address your atrocious grammar before writing any articles in the future.
I would settle for good science and poor grammar from our scientists.
His grammar looks correct. Can you pick out a sentence that is incorrect to critique? He does use clauses between subjects and verbs, which should be enclosed by commas as he has done. Might this be throwing you off?
Since Trump has already proven himself to be a Welfare Queen, I'm sure non-economically-prosperous areas of the country will continue chewing on the prosperous, uh, Democratic states.
Oh, f*ck it, California should quit propping up the rest of the country. Thank you.
Really real person wrote:
Since Trump has already proven himself to be a Welfare Queen, I'm sure non-economically-prosperous areas of the country will continue chewing on the prosperous, uh, Democratic states.
Oh, f*ck it, California should quit propping up the rest of the country. Thank you.
Yeah ... let's see how well California does once the electric transmission wires from the inland Pacific Northwest are cut, the oil and gas from Texas ceases to flow in, and the water from the Colorado is no longer diverted to support the faux utopia that is leftist California.