No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
We won't be.
He's with her!
Muslim refugee from Somalia = Mo Farah
Thankfully Trump was elected and we can prevent non-stop immigration from Muslim refugees who we can not adequately vet. Hillary would have bowed to the extremists in her party (aren't they all extremists?) and allowed unmitigated immigration from these potential terrorists.
Reel K5 wrote:
Never heard of Israel?
Agree. As far as this country, though, they're all going back.
The KKK are still here....and growing.
Trump has already walked back the muslim ban, because it pissed of Turkey, where he's building a new hotel.
Chewbaccca wrote:
No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
This dude was probably in America for at least 10-15 years. Us being in the Middle East pisses off muslims because we've literally destroyed their lands.
Sbeefyk1 wrote:
Chewbaccca wrote:No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
This dude was probably in America for at least 10-15 years. Us being in the Middle East pisses off muslims because we've literally destroyed their lands.
Ummm.... the French and the Belgians were never in their lands. Look what these animals did to them, putting nails and other instruments in their bombs to exact the most damage to the little girls and boys that they killed and maimed. Were they in the Middle East? NO, idiot.
Actually the French have been very supportive of military actions in the Middle East. Try to keep up.
U. R. Stupid wrote:
Actually the French have been very supportive of military actions in the Middle East. Try to keep up.
It's not hard to see they're committing these same types of attacks everywhere they exist in the world from Bangledash to Nigeria.
Sbeefyk1 wrote:
Chewbaccca wrote:No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
This dude was probably in America for at least 10-15 years. Us being in the Middle East pisses off muslims because we've literally destroyed their lands.
I'm glad someone joined this discussion with true and hard facts. Could you let me know your source for the 10-15 number?
Brietbart.com
SAlly V wrote:
Sbeefyk1 wrote:This dude was probably in America for at least 10-15 years. Us being in the Middle East pisses off muslims because we've literally destroyed their lands.
Ummm.... the French and the Belgians were never in their lands. Look what these animals did to them, putting nails and other instruments in their bombs to exact the most damage to the little girls and boys that they killed and maimed. Were they in the Middle East? NO, idiot.
Ummmm actually the French and Belgians were part of the coalition and have had troops in Afghanistan.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/24/majority-of-fatal-attacks-on-us-soil-carried-out-b/Majority of fatal attacks on U.S. soil carried out by white supremacists, not terrorists
In the 14 years since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, nearly twice as many people have been killed in the United States by white supremacists and anti-government radicals than by Muslim jihadis, according to a new study.
White supremacists and anti-government radicals have killed 48 Americans, including last week’s deadly attack in South Carolina, versus 26 killings by Muslim radicals, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.
I thought for sure it was gonna wind up being Jim Harbaugh.
Well done! Let me play!
Majority of cat food eaten by cats.
There have been about 20 mass shootings in the past 5 years. And while there has been an uptick in Muslim involvement in the past 2 years, most are not affiliated with that religion. If go back through the history loners, nihilists, and white supremacists are the most common suspects.
But what the heck, let's just arm everyone to the teeth, maybe make carry permits mandatory for every male citizen.
Lover of deflections wrote:
Well done! Let me play!
Majority of cat food eaten by cats.
Within any population, there is going to be violence.
So why are Americans tolerant of white nationalist violence, but completely intolerant of violence when it involves muslims?