In all seriousness, they both looked pretty unimpressive, apart of course for Justyn knight. Sure its a long season but i can't see either of these two teams winning come November unless there's some MAJOR improvements. BYU looks great and in my mind have to be one of the favorites now. Oregon and Arkansas are probably lickin their chops right now!
Not impressed wrote:
In all seriousness, they both looked pretty unimpressive, apart of course for Justyn knight. Sure its a long season but i can't see either of these two teams winning come November unless there's some MAJOR improvements. BYU looks great and in my mind have to be one of the favorites now. Oregon and Arkansas are probably lickin their chops right now!
Although a unpopular point of view, I agree. While Justyn Knight may be an amazing runner, it takes 5 guys to win a title. Not one (team wise). If Oregon can put a cross team together (doubtful) then they could easily when the title.
Too bad Drew Hunter went pro Oregon would be a look to Win NCAA with King Ches and Hunter more then likely going 1-2 at NCAA's this year. :(
Iseewhatyouresaying wrote:
Not impressed wrote:In all seriousness, they both looked pretty unimpressive, apart of course for Justyn knight. Sure its a long season but i can't see either of these two teams winning come November unless there's some MAJOR improvements. BYU looks great and in my mind have to be one of the favorites now. Oregon and Arkansas are probably lickin their chops right now!
Although a unpopular point of view, I agree. While Justyn Knight may be an amazing runner, it takes 5 guys to win a title. Not one (team wise). If Oregon can put a cross team together (doubtful) then they could easily when the title.
Not sure why it's "doubtfull" that Oregon could put a team together. They're consistently the best distance program in the country. I could definitely see them dominating again this year.
Stanford didn't run their top guys.
they call me flopro wrote:
Too bad Drew Hunter went pro Oregon would be a look to Win NCAA with King Ches and Hunter more then likely going 1-2 at NCAA's this year. :(
Idk, I think Drew not being there is better for them. Him and ches would have likely run each other into the ground racing every day.
Cuse will be fine. They did a total ball buster workout a week ago. I know a lot of teams probably did too but they'll put it together. Slipping a little early will benefit them for November.
#Orangeisthenewfast
Not impressed wrote:
Iseewhatyouresaying wrote:Although a unpopular point of view, I agree. While Justyn Knight may be an amazing runner, it takes 5 guys to win a title. Not one (team wise). If Oregon can put a cross team together (doubtful) then they could easily when the title.
Not sure why it's "doubtfull" that Oregon could put a team together. They're consistently the best distance program in the country. I could definitely see them dominating again this year.
Ummm.....ever heard of the University of Texas?
black runner wrote:
Stanford didn't run their top guys.
Even if they did and went 1-2 they still would have been 3rd... they're terrible.
Y
Describer of Dems wrote:
Not impressed wrote:Not sure why it's "doubtfull" that Oregon could put a team together. They're consistently the best distance program in the country. I could definitely see them dominating again this year.
Ummm.....ever heard of the University of Texas?
Yeah, I heard they can't even win Big 12s...
SweetRder wrote:
Cuse will be fine. They did a total ball buster workout a week ago. I know a lot of teams probably did too but they'll put it together. Slipping a little early will benefit them for November.
#Orangeisthenewfast
They might be, but I can already see a Georgetown win. Those boys are fit and hungry and will be ready to contend for the win in a couple months.
Not impressed wrote:
Y
Describer of Dems wrote:Ummm.....ever heard of the University of Texas?
Yeah, I heard they can't even win Big 12s...
That might be true but the fastest ever NCAA Steepler (fastest PR) of all time ran there.
black runner wrote:
Stanford didn't run their top guys.
This sport sucks. No one wants to race. They just want to train.
They held out a lot more than "1-2." And yes, these preseason meets are frustrating and pointless.
Not impressed wrote:
black runner wrote:Stanford didn't run their top guys.
Even if they did and went 1-2 they still would have been 3rd... they're terrible.
Campbell University, via Kenya, all the way baby!
wwhut wrote:
black runner wrote:Stanford didn't run their top guys.
This sport sucks. No one wants to race. They just want to train.
THIS.
could not agree more wrote:
wwhut wrote:This sport sucks. No one wants to race. They just want to train.
THIS.
Truth
Campbell soup wrote:
Awesome!
http://www.gocamels.com/sports/xc/2016-17/releases/20160923jcstithttp://www.gocamels.com/sports/xc/2016-17/mwroster
Now that took some coaching (not).
Not impressed wrote:
Iseewhatyouresaying wrote:Although a unpopular point of view, I agree. While Justyn Knight may be an amazing runner, it takes 5 guys to win a title. Not one (team wise). If Oregon can put a cross team together (doubtful) then they could easily when the title.
Not sure why it's "doubtfull" that Oregon could put a team together. They're consistently the best distance program in the country. I could definitely see them dominating again this year.
When was the last time Oregon dominated NCAA Cross?!
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these