gravelrunner wrote:
I'll be glad to prove you all wrong. I will race a 10K on asphalt in september.
So 5 min/mile would mean approx. 36.58 since I ran 37.32 on gravel. This is what you guys are saying?
If I ran faster than 36.58 you guys are wrong. I will post my race with map, time and distance so you'll see I'm not a trolling like you.
Still I think 5 min/mile is conservative.
what you run on gravel vs asphalt is not necessarily the difference the average person experiences. Empirically, gravel is about 5 seconds a mile slower. If you are losing more time than that you could be wearing bad running shoes, or you could be doing something wrong. Your september race won't correlate to your summer race due to cooler temperatures and less humidity, unless you live on the west coast or something.
It really sounds to me that you want to believe yourself to be more fit than you actually are, like someone claiming he runs 15+ secs a mile faster on a track than a dry xc course without too many hills. Maybe, but probably not.