I think they should be banned.
Beach = few clothes. Can't hack it? Don't go.
I think they should be banned.
Beach = few clothes. Can't hack it? Don't go.
I don't really particularly care, but it's hilarious to me to see all the whiny SJWs get up in arms about them banning it . . . So for that reason I fully support the ban!
The French already police the pools, so that you have to wear a speedo on account of "hygiene." So, not surprising that they want to police the beaches as well. But how do you legally differentiate, assuming this was legitimate, between fully dressed people, say, trying to cover up a burn scar or trying to prevent skin cancer after previous bouts of it, and people dressed in the so-called burkini on a beach? Indeed, they have cited various people not wearing a burkini. Moreover, there was a long fight to be allowed to wear skimpy clothes or no clothes at their beaches, establishing the principle that you could wear what you wanted to. Now, they are going to enforce regular bikinis or nothing? The optics of it all (police surrounding a woman in a burkini) are too close to Saudi Arabia, only there they want to cover them up, whereas in France they are forcing them to undress.
The majority of Burkinis are purchased by non-Muslims. How do they plan on fining the Muslims who wear Burkinis while leaving the non-Muslims alone?
Perverted white men want to see women uncovered. Why is it any of your business what a woman does with HER body?
Let's see the hottest burkini pics you've got.
There was a video on the news tonight of a beach in Nice where apparently they made a woman remove the burkini.
I have been to that beach. The hotness there...unbelievable. If they want the ladies in the skimpiest clothes (and no top!) there, well, that's their country and god bless them for it.
I am against the ban. I don't want the government deciding that one shold be fined for what they wear unless it is for sanitary reasons. Women should get to choose what they want to wear.
At the same time, I think any woman who wants to wear a burkini at a beach is not a rational person. The whole idea that if hair is exposed makes a woman a whore or not devote enough to God is morAnic
If a God did create the universe, does anyone really think exposed head hair and exposed arms and legs of a woman is really a big deal to such a being?
Compare what orthodox Muslims and orthodox Jews wear to the beach:
All of them are identifying themselves as strong believers in fairy tales.
I look at all of them like I look at people who believe Elvis is alive or people who think astrology is valid.
Blah Blah. wrote:
Compare what orthodox Muslims and orthodox Jews wear to the beach:
http://forward.com/sisterhood/348382/seriously-what-orthodox-women-wear-to-the-beach-is-no-different-from-a-burk/
Looks like jews are allowed to show their hair.
Jews also haven't been committing terrorist attacks on every continent.
Red Pill Giver wrote:
Looks like jews are allowed to show their hair.
Jews also haven't been committing terrorist attacks on every continent.
Jews have been busy committing genocide for the past 70 years.
Neutral Observer wrote:
Red Pill Giver wrote:Looks like jews are allowed to show their hair.
Jews also haven't been committing terrorist attacks on every continent.
Jews have been busy committing genocide for the past 70 years.
No, they've been trying to peacefully coexist with a group that wants them wiped off the map.
Red Pill Giver wrote:
No, they've been trying to peacefully coexist with a group that wants them wiped off the map.
I'm sure Jews bombing hospitals and schools and stealing everything in sight qualifies as peace.
It doesn't matter that going to the beach in full-body covering is asinine or that the burka could rightly be seen as a symbol of oppression against women. If you support this ban, you're a fascist. Pretty simple.
Neutral Observer wrote:
Red Pill Giver wrote:No, they've been trying to peacefully coexist with a group that wants them wiped off the map.
I'm sure Jews bombing hospitals and schools and stealing everything in sight qualifies as peace.
All they've done is defend themselves against the terrorist group known as Hamas. Arabs in Israel live happy and prosperous lives, compare that to how Jews live in Muslim countries (oh wait they can't). The problem is living in peace isn't good enough, they won't be satisfied until Jews are wiped off the face of the Earth.
You are clueless if you think you are neutral.
UN schools were used to store weapons. This is common knowledge.
Israel could have used more restraint when people were around or in schools and worked harder to limit collateral damage. That could be a valid argument. But don't pretend schools were a target because Israel is interested in committing genocide.
You spread bad propaganda while calling yourself a neutral observer.
Palestinians have a right to self defence. As an occupying power Israel has no similar right.
If you think they should be banned you should just leave the United States now and never come back because you don't appreciate freedom. Make room for someone who does.
It is possible to oppose the French ban on burkinis while also challenging the mindset of those who support burkas and burkinis.