0/10 wrote:
Olympic Truth wrote:AGAIN. YOU? Limited knowledge as to what the bio passport looks for and the chemistry involved with making a designer stimulant. Im not a chemist, and I dont work for IAAF or WADA but alot of people may have knowledge about that and can inform me.
Thats a good title. So you might get it.
So you have limited knowledge of both chemistry and bio passports. What exactly would you say you know pertaining to this subject. I would love to read your paper if you don't mind posting it.
I should but it is old, like 2005 old and I need to re-read/re-do if I was to post. I really do not want to be found out.
Doping in Sports- its a PDF you can get for free that is decent on the general state of doping.
I know about realistic progression in track, more on anabolics based on when I started my research. How they can affect a person ability to recover, gain strength, which drugs help with only strength and aggression rather than weight. Basically how Primo and Halo work vs. Deca of Winstol. I knew about drugs like THG and How did THG came about before Lance published which is why he called me. Now not exactly THG, but the idea that there were some rejected substances which were out there. Thats from Tim Layden and his article in 1997 in SI. I connected the dots and forecasted that the Internet would lead to small countries gaining power. I said Jamaica, Mexico and Portugal. I really thought Portugal with Obikwelu getting the silver would lead. And Layden named Jamaica too.So I have limited chemistry knowledge, which is really all it takes to understand designer steroids, but now with stimulants I need to determine how easy are they to manipulate. Steroids only 17 or 19 to manipulate.