It should not be necessary for us to "present" the evidence. We gathered the evidence, cataloged it in a easy to use document, and handed it over. The "independent analyzers" should be able to take that and... analyze it. If they still come to the conclusion you predict, then they were either not independent, or not competent.
executive summary wrote:
There is no evidence presented in a readable format. No, I'm sorry, 8000+ posts on letsrun are not evidence. Neither are a huge google doc or a complex web site.
Present evidence as 3-4 obviously faked "runs" and explain why they're fake. Compare the paces to world records or similar. Unless a short list of clear evidence is presented, expect the "independent" analyzers to conclude there's no evidence for him cheating. For example they may say:
A simplified presentation like you are talking about is what's needed to convince Mrs. HalfMary Hobbyjogger on facebook, not a panel of experts.