What's a better time...
2:04-800
4:35-1600
10:00-3200
What's a better time...
2:04-800
4:35-1600
10:00-3200
1600 by a pretty big margin. But it depends on the runner as well
The 10 is the worst, the others are a toss up.
All pretty much the same.
no endurance wrote:
The 10 is the worst, the others are a toss up.
That is what the calculators say but wow that makes no sense. I've seen several 2:04 guys that could never run the latter.
Actual dude 376 wrote:
no endurance wrote:The 10 is the worst, the others are a toss up.
That is what the calculators say but wow that makes no sense. I've seen several 2:04 guys that could never run the latter.
But you'll also see 10:00 guys who can't go below 2:10. Depends on the runner
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year