WOW: 5th ranked female Australia soccer team loses to 14 year old boys. 7:0 is the result.

Soccer Guy2 wrote:

To anyone who doesn't understand how big the differences in female vs. male soccer are:

Australias womens side had a test game against Newcastle Jet's under 15 team (13 to 14 year old boys). They lost 7:0 and went home devestated.

Mind you, Australia is currently 5th ranked and one of the favorites for the Rio Olympics (besides the US, Germany and Japan).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3609949/Matildas-lose-7-0-Newcastle-Jets-15s-Rio-Olympics-warm-up.html

Do you know any other sport where the best women would get desroyed by 14 year old boys?

This is the equivalent of a 14 year old boy running 14:25 or 2:21 Marathon.

Except the story is Australia vs Australia.

Could that U15 Australia team beat the US women's team?

it's like a 14 year old Ethiopian boy running 14:25, which wouldn't shock me too much.

As far as an analogy using US running, it would be like a 14 year old running 15:10 or 2:30-ish. Or even more precisely an all-star team of 14 year-old boys beating our best women's runners.

Soccer Guy2 wrote:

To anyone who doesn't understand how big the differences in female vs. male soccer are:

Australias womens side had a test game against Newcastle Jet's under 15 team (13 to 14 year old boys). They lost 7:0 and went home devestated.

Mind you, Australia is currently 5th ranked and one of the favorites for the Rio Olympics (besides the US, Germany and Japan).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3609949/Matildas-lose-7-0-Newcastle-Jets-15s-Rio-Olympics-warm-up.html

Do you know any other sport where the best women would get desroyed by 14 year old boys?

This is the equivalent of a 14 year old boy running 14:25 or 2:21 Marathon.

Not sure. But I definitely have a hard time thinking of better ways to advertise your insecurity as a male than comparing female to male athletic capabilities.

Not completely surprising.

Years ago, the U.S. womens team that had Mia Hamm and Michele Akers would routinely play boys high school teams as tune-ups for tournaments.

Boys this age are just as big, probably faster, and are more of a challenge for a womens team trying to improve.

But they're not equally matched. They won 7-0 so they're significantly better.

Except what?

He pointed out the the Australian Women's team is currently ranked 5th in the world. It isn't much of a reach to assume that this 14 year old team could beat ANY women's soccer team. Besides, who said this was the best 14 year old team in the world? Maybe they would only be ranked 20th in the world.

Soccer Guy2 wrote:

To anyone who doesn't understand how big the differences in female vs. male soccer are:

Australias womens side had a test game against Newcastle Jet's under 15 team (13 to 14 year old boys). They lost 7:0 and went home devestated.

Mind you, Australia is currently 5th ranked and one of the favorites for the Rio Olympics (besides the US, Germany and Japan).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3609949/Matildas-lose-7-0-Newcastle-Jets-15s-Rio-Olympics-warm-up.html

Do you know any other sport where the best women would get desroyed by 14 year old boys?

This is the equivalent of a 14 year old boy running 14:25 or 2:21 Marathon.

Almost as devastating as a she-man handily crushing a female field at 800m in 1:56 to 1:59/2:00. Crazy what a little testosterone will do for ya.

Not even surprised those boys tee'd off on some sheilas. Maybe a few of those U15 boys are brave enough to want a medal in world competition that they'll change their identities? It's a lot harder to win against Germany or South American teams. I just hope the courts are on the right side of history.

Germany's soccer team (women) had a similar experience a few years ago playing against the under 17 of VFB Stuttgart. They stopped the game after the first half, the boys were up 5-0.

You can't compare female to male soccer. It is a different sport.

German dude wrote:

Germany's soccer team (women) had a similar experience a few years ago playing against the under 17 of VFB Stuttgart. They stopped the game after the first half, the boys were up 5-0.

You can't compare female to male soccer. It is a different sport.

What makes a male a male and a female a female doe?

doot doot wrote:

German dude wrote:

Germany's soccer team (women) had a similar experience a few years ago playing against the under 17 of VFB Stuttgart. They stopped the game after the first half, the boys were up 5-0.

You can't compare female to male soccer. It is a different sport.

What makes a male a male and a female a female doe?

According to liberals, however you feel and self identify.

The US women's team did too. They've lost to multiple u-16 and u-17 teams

mcgot wrote:

The US women's team did too. They've lost to multiple u-16 and u-17 teams

I heard they want equal pay though. Equal pay as the 15 year old boys?

I'm not saying it would make any difference - it probably wouldn't - but if you read the article it points out that the women were rotating squads - it wasn't their best lineup.

The New York Red Bulls beat NYCFC 7-0 this past weekend too.

"Bobby, I didn’t think I’d ever need to tell you this, but I would be a bad parent if I didn’t. Soccer was invented by European ladies to keep them busy while their husbands did the cooking."

best bits of womens football

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWsfqX7Wap8

German dude wrote:

mcgot wrote:

The US women's team did too. They've lost to multiple u-16 and u-17 teams

I heard they want equal pay though. Equal pay as the 15 year old boys?

Ah, the classic insecure male. Threads like these invariably are started by and attract large numbers of insecure males.

I C wrote:

German dude wrote:

I heard they want equal pay though. Equal pay as the 15 year old boys?

Ah, the classic insecure male. Threads like these invariably are started by and attract large numbers of insecure males.

But yet he makes a good point.

insecure mail wrote:

I heard they want equal pay though. Equal pay as the 15 year old boys?

Ah, the classic insecure male. Threads like these invariably are started by and attract large numbers of insecure males.[/quote]

But yet he makes a good point.[/quote]

Absolutely. When HRC compares the 70c on the $, she makes the same mistake. Just because it's the same job description, doesn't mean they work as hard or much.

When comparing Apples to Apples, women make 94c on the $. That gap should be close, I agree.

By that comparison btw, the US FIFA players should probably earn 20c per each $ the men make.

The women's team had a few key players missing and they're not "peaking"

But yeah, teenage boys are often going to be better than women. Most 14yo boys are taller and faster than women. Also remember this is a highly ranked boys team it's not just a high school team

Playing males will make them better!

Re the equal pay, if you are at the top of your league you should get equal pay, even if your team is lower than the other team