sffdsaf wrote:
Solinsky's 10000, to me, is a greater performance than Billy Mills' Olympic win. For one, he broke a huge barrier that a U.S. runner had never come close to running before. Secondly, the time was 1 minute and 18 seconds better than anything Billy Mills ever ran, ranking Solinsky the third fastest in the world over 10000 during 2010, a much more competitive time period than the days when MIlls ran. Lastly, Solinsky had a better overall career, accomplishment wise, than Mills when taking into account high school, college, and professional running. To me, Solinsky's 10000 run, and his 5000's that summer, were more meaningful to United States running than Mills' Olympic run because it opened the door to U.S. born runners being competitive on the world level after over a decade of being dormant.
Are yall on crack? Comparing Chris Solinsky's 10k to Billy Mills' 10k? What a sham.
You're right, "Solinsky's 10000 run, and his 5000's that summer were more meaningful to United States running than Mill's Olympic run because it opened the door to U.S. born runners being competitive on the world level..."
Right, because "opening the door" is more meaningful than actually winning gold at the olympics. Makes perfect sense. Solinsky never actually made it to the olympics, but he accomplished more than Billy Mills. Right.
How's that crack? or is it meth?
Chris sounded a little bitter when he said that bit about not being a scrawny punk to be good. Sounds like he had a chip on his shoulder or something to prove.