SlipperyPete13 wrote:
You don't think there's a difference between someone with many years of training under their belt vs. someone in the beginning stages of their running career? And you also don't think there's a difference between a fully developed male and a still developing female, a group that is much more prone to stress fractures? I'm not being facetious; I'm genuinely curious as to whether you don't think that a person's gender and age factor into the type of work they can handle.
I am not being facetious either and I will try to answer in a sincere way.
Q1: You said she is a sophomore, so I assumed she had run since Fall of '14. This seems like enough foundation to run 1600/3200 in a meet to me.
Similarly, why do you assume that I had many yrs of training when I did my first doubles? I was not trying to compare her to me, because I don't know her. But all of us did doubles when I was a freshman. If you ran the 800m, you usually would triple. I was lucky that we had a freshman-only team, and so I was running against others my age, but I was running 4:50/10:20 as a freshy so that was comparable to the times run in varsity. We ran 14 outdoor meets that Spring and I think I doubled in 5 of them. I was training really consistently, so I would not compare myself to someone I don't know.
But the answer is FOR ME, I don't think there is a difference in how you warmup or stretch or rest for the second race for different runners. If they are ready to double, they can just tackle the double just like I did. If they are not ready, they should not do it and no amount of food or foam rollers will fix that.
Q2: This was not a question of comparing a male and a female at any stage of development. You asked, I answered. She is a sophomore, I told you what I did as a freshman (and this was normal practice), and as a sophomore we ran 17 outdoor meets and I doubled at 8 or so, 3200m run at all of them. I certainly was not fully developed by 9th or 10th grade. In 9th grade I was 5'7" and 112lbs.
HS girls seem to be more prone to stress fractures than males whatever their age and training volume/history. I don't think that running the 1600/3200 will be what pushes them over the edge to a stress fracture compared to just the 1600 or 3200.
But what our coach did with the girls in XC (because they nearly all got injured once per XC season and the boys nearly NEVER did) was to have them all race in road racing flats and not spikes. The boys on the other hand, carried their spikes to the race course or the park or the hill-repeat hill, and switched into them for miles, 880s, quarters, 1000s and hill repeats.
So, yes, I think you should be more careful with shin stress fractures with all girls. And maybe during all mile and 2mile races have them race in road-racing flats.
Q3: I don't think a person's gender matters when it comes to a double. If you have 2 runners who are male and female and both are very well-conditioned, there should be no difference in their approach to the 1600/3200 double or other doubles or triples.
Age matters, but at 6th and 7th and 8th grade track meets I doubled at 800/1600. So I think that HSers in general can double. I think that as you get older it is easier to handle a double, it is also easier to handle any track meets.
I know for myself, we did not have 90min rest between, so my approach was either to take the 1600 easy (5-8 sec slower than best) and hammer the 3200. Or, I would hammer the 1600 and accept that the 3200 was just 20-30 min later and I would have to be about 6-12 sec slower than ideal.
So those are my sincere feelings and I was not being mean, I just don't see a need for foam rolling between races (and I DO USE a foam roller now for recovery from rowing and cycling) and I don't think you need more than water (and maybe a gel?) between races.