thejeff wrote:
Sloetry in Motion wrote:A benevolent, just child murderer.
The cognitive dissonance must be painful. I've often heard people say that when they became an atheist everything became so much clearer because they could stop trying to rationalize their god belief with reality. When you figure out why you have to make excuses for the things you believe, you'll figure out why you should stop believing them.
I am sorry you feel that way.
There is no rationalization; there are no excuses.
FWIW, I used to think the same way you do now.
No rationalization? Really?
How about a little thought experiment.
A child is starving to death and you have the ability to feed it with no possible negative consequences to yourself. What should we expect to happen next?
Someone you love is getting raped and you have the ability to stop it with no possible negative consequences to yourself. What should we expect to happen next?
A friend of yours loses a limb and you have the power to regrow it with no possible negative consequences to yourself. What should we expect to happen next?
Now replace you in these scenarios with your god. I can guess the first thing that crosses your mind. It's not whether you should reconsider whether your god is as loving as you thought. It's not whether you reconsider if your relgious beliefs are incorrect. The first thing that crosses your mind is that you can explain why your god would act (or not act at all) in a way that no other loving being would in these situations. This is not reasoning, it's rationalization and excuse making.
Thing about it: You hold yourself to a higher standard than hold your god.