Glad that's all been put to bed.
Glad that's all been put to bed.
Please move along...
http://news.sky.com/story/1595624/radcliffe-cleared-of-unfounded-doping-claims
A large dose of humble pie has been served to many members of this forum. Tuck in lads, do enjoy!
That's what happens when morons on the internet try to interpret scientific data.
Colonel Jagger wrote:
A large dose of humble pie has been served to many members of this forum. Tuck in lads, do enjoy!
It's a good thing the IAAF has always processed every positive they have ever had.
Colonel Jagger wrote:
A large dose of humble pie has been served to many members of this forum. Tuck in lads, do enjoy!
The drug obsessed nutters on this website will not accept it. They will only see a conspiracy.
This reads exactly as one would expect, and is not very reassuring.
The woman has not one, but three scores above the threshold for women.
Urine tests for EPO are a joke.
Urine tests for EPO should be clear on race day unless you are a complete idiot. 48 hours is sufficient to never test positive and come race day the EPO is working to maximum efficacy.
And then the explanation that another urine test eight days later is clear is supposed to mean something. You may as well test urine for year-old EPO. It's always negative.
"Altitude training" is a foolproof blood doping escape clause. Good thing she's clean.
EPO cheats out Paula.
Move over Sunshine wrote:
That's what happens when morons on the internet try to interpret scientific data.
This.
Hmph wrote:
This reads exactly as one would expect, and is not very reassuring.
But not this.
The 5 Russian athletes were cleared by the IAAF
No doubt Lord Coe is behind this nonsense
She said herself that blood data cannot clear an athlete
Move over Sunshine wrote:
That's what happens when morons on the internet try to interpret scientific data.
I agree.
WADA and the other drug agencies should be dissolved immediately.
They didn't clear her of the founded ones though.
It seems that you have friends in Russia, the IAAF and elsewhere that agree with you. Be patient. This whole doping thing will blow over and we can have athletes like Lance, Marion, and Regina re-instated and assuming their rightful place in athletic history! Such a tragedy that such sincere people as Lance, Eddy H and Paula have had their names sullied so!
J.R. wrote:
Move over Sunshine wrote:That's what happens when morons on the internet try to interpret scientific data.
I agree.
WADA and the other drug agencies should be dissolved immediately.
He doesn't realize that Seb Coe, Paula Radcliffe, and their cronies at WADA are the pinnacle of modern athletics.
I thought IAAF only protected runners from Eastern Africa. At least you get that impression when you read LR.
History has shown that the IAAF clear whoever they want.
IAAF didn't clear Radcliffe. They just didn't sanction Radcliffe. Note how their conclusion was that there were "plausible" explanations for Paula's blood levels. That's pretty tepid language for something that's allegedly clearing someone.
LOL since when have we trusted the IAAF? Their statement means nothing, goodbye. Bullshit lacking credibility organization.
Once an Expert - agree entirely. The IAAF cannot logically declare PR "innocent" they can only assert that she was not proven guilty with the data available and their statement "there are clearly plausible explanations for the values in her profile" is not a declaration of innocence. Clearly, there were red flags regarding values in her profile. Larry the Lawyer was able to offer arguments (plausible explanations) which the IAAF could not counter.
Once an Expert wrote:
IAAF didn't clear Radcliffe. They just didn't sanction Radcliffe. Note how their conclusion was that there were "plausible" explanations for Paula's blood levels. That's pretty tepid language for something that's allegedly clearing someone.