Bro - Mama wrote:
kimani wrote:In much less competitive eras
Absolutely not true...
Pick a current distance and championship event (WC or OG).
How many people may have a realistic chance at the gold, or any medal?
The same number of guys that had a shot back then.
Times are faster now(for various reasons often discussed on LRC).
Competition was pretty much the same.
Competition was most certainly not the same. One of the largest motivating factors for competition is money, and until the more recent decades, there was none in T&F. Plenty of fantastic athletes let their talent go up in smoke, simply because they didn't have the means to keep training at a high level once out of college. Back then, the top tier runners were a bunch of guys who loved the sport and had work lives that could be molded around training.
Those guys are now the "blue collar" runners of today, getting beaten day in and day out by the well-funded Rupps and Solinskys, as well as legions of East African mercenaries who travel halfway around the world to run a single race from which they could potentially earn more money than they would from years of work.
Comparing the more recent decades (the EPO Era especially) with the older eras is like comparing running and triathlons. One is clearly more competitive than the other, simply because one is far more accessible, and has far more incentives.