We've had eight hearings on Benghzai, where four Americans died.
30,000 people killed a year in the streets and we can't have a sensible discussion about gun control.
Republicans sure have their priorities straight.
We've had eight hearings on Benghzai, where four Americans died.
30,000 people killed a year in the streets and we can't have a sensible discussion about gun control.
Republicans sure have their priorities straight.
Lo Siento wrote:
We've had eight hearings on Benghzai, where four Americans died.
30,000 people killed a year in the streets and we can't have a sensible discussion about gun control.
Republicans sure have their priorities straight.
What is to discuss? Get rid of "gun free zones" and the mass shooting's come to an end.
Give life sentences to those who commit crimes with a gun instead of a slap on the wrist..this would "probably" help. Libtards won't get behind it though...they would rather place blame on the law abiding gun owners instead. Why? Because gun control is not about guns, it is about CONTROL.
Either way, Law Abiding Americans will always be armed and their is nothing any Libtard can do to prevent that.
Lo Siento,
I think you just got owned there, buddy. thanks for playing
What's to discuss wrote:
What is to discuss? Get rid of "gun free zones" and the mass shooting's come to an end.
LOL...plenty of mass shootings not in your precious "gun free zones", hell, there was one on an ARMY BASE!
AND THAY BASE WAS GUN FREE!!!!!!That is the stupidity of the Fort Hood shootings. GUN free zones are advertisements for mass shooters, you dumasss..
Not again... wrote:
LOL...plenty of mass shootings not in your precious "gun free zones", hell, there was one on an ARMY BASE!
Movie theatre in Colorado was not a gun free zone.
Next?
Urine. idiot wrote:
AND THAY BASE WAS GUN FREE!!!!!!That is the stupidity of the Fort Hood shootings. GUN free zones are advertisements for mass shooters, you
dumasss..
No, the base is not "gun free", no matter what your precious Fox News people tell you. Authorized personnel carry weapons on Army bases -- that is how they provide security. And one of those personnel took down the shooter.
The use of the word "libtard" will get you banned on here. We're giving advance notice.
So how do these non-law abiding Americans get guns? Hint, they're not making them on their own.
I completely understand that, in America, the cat is out of the bag, so to speak. There are hundreds of millions of guns out there, and it would be impossible to round them up.
I just don't think the answer is MORE GUNS. That just seems insane. "What's a good solution to gun violence? More bullets flying around!"
A good start would be less of this: http://www.zoloft.com/
Wow you are fckn stupid!!! wrote:
Oh please.. wrote:No, the base is not "gun free", no matter what your precious Fox News people tell you. Authorized personnel carry weapons on Army bases -- that is how they provide security. And one of those personnel took down the shooter.
Hey ass wipe, those people are base security (aka the police). That is no different than off base police. Military installations are all gun free zones retard. If you don't have a badge you aren't carrying a loaded weapon on base...not a personal or govt weapon.
When seconds count the police are only minutes away...on and off a military base. None of those shot and or killed could return fire. Why? Because it was a "gun free zone," YOU $hit stick!
Stay stupid you clueless libtard l
Did it occur to you that no fire need be returned if psycho couldn't get hands on a gun??
I know it's hard to fathom...and you may not be so bright...
You are the fooool here wrote:
Wow you are fckn stupid!!! wrote:Hey ass wipe, those people are base security (aka the police). That is no different than off base police. Military installations are all gun free zones retard. If you don't have a badge you aren't carrying a loaded weapon on base...not a personal or govt weapon.
When seconds count the police are only minutes away...on and off a military base. None of those shot and or killed could return fire. Why? Because it was a "gun free zone," YOU $hit stick!
Stay stupid you clueless libtard l
Did it occur to you that no fire need be returned if psycho couldn't get hands on a gun??
I know it's hard to fathom...and you may not be so bright...
Unauthorized people aren't supposed to get their hands on an airplanes controls either.
So, 30k plus people a year are killed in gun violence in the US, compared to 303 killed in terrorist attacks, and the answer is more guns? If you think that guns are the answer, respond to the following questions:
In an active shooter situation, how is law enforcement supposed to be able to distinguish between the shooter and civilians with firearms trying to take out the shooter?
How many people who own firearms are trained and equipped to take down a shooter who has on body armor?
How many people who own firearms are trained in how to identify and coordinate with plain clothes law enforcement officers? In other words, explain how law enforcement resources will not be wasted sorting out who is the shooter and who is a private citizen gun owner trying to play hero?
Forget gun control. It only arms up the bad guys. How about up to 400K killed every year in US hospitals because of doctor/staff error? Let's talk about that!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/leahbinder/2013/09/23/stunning-news-on-preventable-deaths-in-hospitals/
Lo Siento wrote:
We've had eight hearings on Benghzai, where four Americans died.
30,000 people killed a year in the streets and we can't have a sensible discussion about gun control.
Republicans sure have their priorities straight.
According to the CDC approximately 610,000 Americans die every year from heart disease. What would you like to ban in order to bring that astronomical number down?
Let's not talk about gun control. I don't want to control what type of gun you own.
Let's talk about background checks, specifically, not lumped into some huge gun control effort. Not because background checks will cut gun violence by 90, 80 or even 20% but because a background check is such a minor price to pay if they save even 1 life per year, between suicide and murder.
I have to have a background check to be the assistant coach of my kid's rec track team, why no background check to buy a gun?
Where is the outcry from the left over the 700,000+ unborn children that are slaughtered every year? The act of murder under the guise of choice is sickening.
Howard Dean wrote:
According to the CDC approximately 610,000 Americans die every year from heart disease. What would you like to ban in order to bring that astronomical number down?
Vermont Cheddar Cheese
http://godfatherpolitics.com/7017/did-gun-free-zone-sign-at-theater-contribute-to-shootings/MeHereYouWhere?! wrote:
Movie theatre in Colorado was not a gun free zone.
Next?
Wrong.
Your lies will be called out.
Holmes went out of his way to strike this theatre. The theatres closer to his residence were not...wait for it...gun free zones. Holmes went to this theatre specifically because it was "gun free."
I'm not allowed to say the "L" word now. (Thanks Obama)
Anyways, liberals please provide one gun control policy that would have stopped this attack. We always hear we have to do "something" but never what specifically you would like to see. You also realize that Australia confiscated citizens guns. Yes, confiscated. So when you laugh at rednecks for saying Obama is going to steal their guns, that is exactly what Australia did. Obama is on the record saying he admires Australia's gun control laws which include taking the guns of citizens.