UN’S MULTICULTURAL AGENDA FLOODING GERMANY WITH MUSLIM MIGRANTS

Once the Muslim population rises above 7% of the population there is no going back. The Muslims will terrorize the country. Germany better do something soon.

The interesting question is which country goes down first? Germany, where they're so afraid of being labeled Nazis that they accept everyone and everything? France, where they're too lazy and wimpy too take on the mob? The Netherlands, where they're so liberal about everything, including violence and extremism? Or Belgium with it's hundreds of mosques, ruled by EU-politicians and without any national feelings?

They can all fail, but I think Sweden will collapse first. The Swedes just bend over and blame themselves when they get their butts packed by extremists.

I have a close friend from Czech, and she has stated multiple times that there is a very noticeable increase in immigration, and subsequently, crime.

Why do EU countries feel like they have to take all of these immigrants? Not all of the high-level officials actually believe it will all go off without a hitch. So, what's the deal? Did it start innocently enough and then get totally out of hand.

Of course I get the humanitarian angle. I mean, there are immigrants who don't cause trouble who are fleeing pretty horrible places. But, still, why take SO many.

D-Nice wrote:

Of course I get the humanitarian angle. I mean, there are immigrants who don't cause trouble who are fleeing pretty horrible places. But, still, why take SO many.

The responsibility of working high producing economies has fallen on a white middle class that isn't reproducing. Turns out we need poor immigrants to keep the ships running. No humanitarian angle.

That's not the case, at all. If it were, there would be quota's and limitations.

no, it's not wrote:

That's not the case, at all. If it were, there would be quota's and limitations.

quota's what?

Anyway, I doubt that. My guess is the rate that an immigrant or displaced population's incorporation into the economy is lower per capita than what is necessary to keep the economy they're brought in to support afloat, and European countries are hedging on immigration. Or it's just white genocide, whatever is easier for you guys to believe.

Cockroaches.

nb4Binks

or not idk wrote:

D-Nice wrote:

Of course I get the humanitarian angle. I mean, there are immigrants who don't cause trouble who are fleeing pretty horrible places. But, still, why take SO many.

The responsibility of working high producing economies has fallen on a white middle class that isn't reproducing. Turns out we need poor immigrants to keep the ships running. No humanitarian angle.

If we didn´t take so many immigrants, who would do all the shitty jobs that we are too lazy to do?

Running Machine wrote:

“This [multicultural] approach has failed, utterly failed,” the German chancellor said in 2010.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán denounced the globalist multicultural agenda when he delivered his State of the Nation address in February.

“Europe is facing questions which can no longer be answered within the framework of liberal multiculturalism,” Orbán said. “Can we shelter people, many of whom are unwilling to accept European culture, or who come here with the intent of destroying European culture?”

"intent of destroying European culture???" Nonsense.

"Excluded entirely from European culture" is more like it.

The answer is integration not mutliculturalism, but the Europeans can't even integrate amongst themselves.

How the heck they will integrate non-Europeans is beyond me.

4runner wrote:

"intent of destroying European culture???" Nonsense.

It's not non-sense, at all. It's history repeating itself. This has happened before, but obviously in much more aggressive fashion.

The answer is integration not mutliculturalism, but the Europeans can't even integrate amongst themselves.

Ummm, the aggressive push for Islamic law, is not integration, or multiculturalism. And yes, the push is real, whether you believe it or not.

Personally, I believe in conservation of culture. While I understand that history/time has a way of creating/evolving/destroying culture's, it is my opinion that we are at time when vast understandings of history and its cultures, are greater than ever. I believe that we are at a point where countries can essentially 'save' themselves and their culture's... And create a world of vast difference/diversity.

Multiculturalism is not about culture, at all. It is a timeline of culture destruction.