obviously trying hard wrote:
Neutral Stance wrote:She talked a big game about responding to Alberto and USA's, but it's been crickets ever since.
Umm, Magness issued a response the day after Salazar's that was on this very site?
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=6586094&page=10It might not have been the book length meandering response Alberto gave, but it seems like it was Magness saying "thanks for confirming the major points I made, you're lying about my character, I'm not stooping to your level."
Agree or disagree on the style of response, but it is a response.
Goucher on the other hand said she'd address it after USA's. Which it is after USA's.
I disagree, they haven't responded in a detailed enough fashion to adequately refute Salazar. Remember, when the allegations first came out, Salazar and Rupp both immediately responded saying the accusations were false. Then the Brojo's put a clock on the front page after about 3 weeks of no additional comments. Magness and Goucher have basically done the same "no he's still wrong" comment, but nothing detailed. So put the pressure on them to do so.
Magness's response was unbelievably weak and did not engage in Alberto's refutations and nuance about why Magness's claims were wrong. He needs to do better.
The Goucher's need to say anything at all, at least try and respond.
Neither accusers have brought forth any evidence still, just their own anecdotes.