I am a self-appointed poster of statistics free of any Brojo stamp of approval, therefore I get to set my own standards of what I count.
I am not banning you, or even chiding you, for your posts, just not counting them until they have some inherent value of newness.
I cannot make you run a mile before you post again, but part of your investigation might be aided if you attempted to understand running through first-hand experience.
As an example of what would definitely count as a good post: if you were to attempt to get into the mind of the perpetrator like they did in Silence of the Lambs by going out and running(or even walking) the marathon course you might come across the key piece of evidence or see the event in a new perspective that helps you break the case wide open. Like stumbling across a sign for a book club that meets at Starbucks every week near the finish of the course and then you go on Facebook and see photos from that day timestamped during the race in which someone is in the background. Not saying it will happen the first mile but maybe the second or the 23rd. Anyway, that would be the basis of a good post: a field report examining forensic analysis.
Feel free to post away, I just reserve the right to count or not count in statistics. And trust me, no one wants to have to do the menial tedious work of counting in order to post these statistics.
Please consider running or walking a mile and then posting. I am sure it would count.
I will not keep replying to you, regrettably, because I feel it is unfair for me to pad the statistics by posting a lot just about statistics. In fact I probably will not count my posts anymore either in order to keep the integrity high.