abingtonrunner2 wrote:
eaglesfan wrote:No it isn't working. Why continue to beat a dead horse? We've all had enough of this issue and most have moved on. At most it's you word against his. Whether he ran 3:11 or not (I admit I am still debating it) has become irrelevant. If you want these marathons to change their policies I'm all for it but no need to continue crucifying the guy.
You mean you may have gad enough, so why don't you move along. I have sent a number of emails to decision makes and have had some feedback, hence, my comment about working.
The facts are overwhelming and reasonable people come to similar conclusions. I admire your determination, but, some kind words from some reasonable people inside the race management is different than a DQ.
BTW, I'm totally okay with how things turned out. It's a fantastic story that just keeps giving. Serial cheating a-hole, clever scheme, cowardly race directors, apologetic cheaters who want to enable their own cheating are all part of such a great story.
The race directors who wouldn't do a thing know their business are people like Mike Rossi. I'm so glad I'm not invested heavily in another corrupt, indifferent sports-business. It makes everything so much more enjoyable.