How exactly would Mike Rossi sue anyone? You can't sue someone if they are right. Am I wrong here legal experts? Wouldn't he need to show that whoever he is suing was knowingly spreading false information with malicious intent?
Well, I'm sure some are malicious but they aren't saying anything they know to be false because Rossi did not in fact run whatever Podunk Marathon we are talking about. He'd have to prove in court that:
A) He did run the marathon.
B) That the Brojos or whoever knew he ran the marathon and knowingly said otherwise in order to cause him harm
Of course if MR could prove A, then this thread wouldn't have ever gotten to page 2.
Legal guys, chime in, if I'm wrong here. I admit to having less legal training than Lionel Hutz, but this is how I understand things.