RossiRat wrote:
theREALsmokingGunner wrote:Looks like Ken is up again.
You seem tense.
You mad Ken?
RossiRat wrote:
theREALsmokingGunner wrote:Looks like Ken is up again.
You seem tense.
You mad Ken?
Kenneth StiIIman wrote:
Kenneth StiIIman wrote:Well said bro.
And I take back all those things I said about you for stealing my handle. Peace and love bro.
I take back what I said: Ken is a fat b!tch.
And nobody stole your handle Kenneth Stiiiman.
I appreciate Ken's relentless approach because he has dealt with direct personal attacks from Mike and he does not conceal his identity. He can also be funny without involving the family. Here's an exemplary tweet:"This week would've been much better to use the timeshare. Maybe you need to watch the weather forecast more."As far as his family being discussed or criticized, I compare his specific situation to an ugly divorce. The parents vow to not get the kids involved but the split up takes a life of its own and no one budges. Mike has attracted all this negativity and is destroying his reputation. Think about this, he posted that letter on FB so obviously he disregarded how it would impact the family. Now he's been exposed as a cheat and because of his ego the problem inevitably spills over to the entire household. I wouldn't personally attack the family, but having a scumbag dad/husband is enough to drag everyone into the quicksand.
So you take issue with a man cheating but give a guy going after kids a pass?
To each his own.
Mike and Ken lose.
Trollminator wrote:
The parents vow to not get the kids involved but the split up takes a life of its own and no one budges. Mike has attracted all this negativity and is destroying his reputation. Think about this, he posted that letter on FB so obviously he disregarded how it would impact the family. Now he's been exposed as a cheat and because of his ego the problem inevitably spills over to the entire household. I wouldn't personally attack the family, but having a scumbag dad/husband is enough to drag everyone into the quicksand.
No. There is one and only one person who is negatively targeting the kids and wife. Why can everybody else refrain from doing so (since it is common deceny) except for this filthy person?
To be passive is wrong. Those kids didn't do a single thing wrong. Imagine the embarrassment they experience already with the publicity, only to have a grown man publishing your name and talking about your friends and calling your mother names. Do you think your kid should have to got thought that for something you did?
Being passive is wrong.
Ummm Mike is a cheater and he cheated America. Time for this scum to go down. I honor Ken for the job he has done in bringing down this cheat
What has Ken done that can point to stick?
Mike is scum, his kids aren't. You don't make a distinction?
i78 Rossi Lane wrote:
What has Ken done that can point to stick?
Mike is scum, his kids aren't. You don't make a distinction?
If the company you are apart of is wicked then you are wicked as well.
Too bad
Stick with eharmony wrote:
i78 Rossi Lane wrote:What has Ken done that can point to stick?
Mike is scum, his kids aren't. You don't make a distinction?
If the company you are apart of is wicked then you are wicked as well.
Too bad
Wow I just lost a ton of respect for you stick.
:(
Kenneth StiIlman wrote:
Kenneth StiIIman wrote:And I take back all those things I said about you for stealing my handle. Peace and love bro.
I take back what I said: Ken is a fat b!tch.
And nobody stole your handle Kenneth Stiiiman.
No he's Kenneth Stiliman, I'm Kenneth Stiiiman, I think. Ah well, who gives a flying fcuk anyway. And you're right about Ken and that real gunner idiot.
i78 Rossi Lane wrote:
What has Ken done that can point to stick?
Mike is scum, his kids aren't. You don't make a distinction?
Mike and Ken's similarities, both are/have:
1. They both can dish it out but can't take it.
2. DJ's and each seem to have issues within their respective industry.
3. Liars
4. BULLIES
5. Cheaters - Mike in running, Ken - customers
6. Multiple screen names/profiles
7. Convoluted theories
8. Stalkers and predators
9. Big talkers
10. Annoying
11. Clueless
12. Can't accept responsibility for their own words and actions.
I meant what has Ken positively to bring down Rossi.... Stick said he honored Ken so I asked him what Ken has done to help.
anyways it looks like stick is ok with the stuff Ken does to little kids so I'm over it.
Goodnight Ken
They are deleting my posts, it is a conspiracy on here.
There is a cheeto Mexican casserole in the fridge for you if you stay up late again.
I have a new theory too: Mike is planning to run Boston again and qualify. If he does that, even if he can't run 3:11 he thinks that will silence most people.
I think he will run the Philly marathon to qualify.
Mrs. S wrote:
Goodnight Ken
They are deleting my posts, it is a conspiracy on here.
There is a cheeto Mexican casserole in the fridge for you if you stay up late again.
I have a new theory too: Mike is planning to run Boston again and qualify. If he does that, even if he can't run 3:11 he thinks that will silence most people.
I think he will run the Philly marathon to qualify.
This would be his best course of action and to run for charity while doing it. Guy has to try to rehab his image now after the Biggest Loser article.
Maybe he'll take up triathlon or something entirely different.
I78 Rossi Lane AKA theREALsmokingGunner.
The triathlon angle has already been discussed and it was agreed that Mike would excel. By necessity you are in proximity to a road.
Given his math he'd probably run across the finish line 6 hours into an Ironman just to get to Kona.
Kenneth StiIIman wrote:
I78 Rossi Lane AKA theREALsmokingGunner.
You've admitted you are the guy who has registered user names replacing i with L to confuse others.
you're just mad I caught you SmartRunnr. Go back to that handle. You sucked less.
Ain't gonna get any more bites from me troll.
Ken has the single best Twitter account I have ever visited. For that we thank him.
And I am just posting this to bump the thread.
Mike, don't get excited if this thread slips down the page or even goes to page two for a day. This isn't going away.
: )
I agree - the only way this goes away is if Mike admits he cheated.
He will never admit that because he is Mike Rossi. King of all cheaters.
But... if he were to admit, the conversation would quickly focus on Barb McKeever. If Barb DQd Mike, then she would be clear.
It is kind of a game of chicken here -- who flinches first?
I guess you could say this game of chicken has created a chicken dance.
It will be interesting to see if Mike runs NYC this year. Of course that is 11 months away.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year