Hillary Clinton had her email server wiped clean!

BENGHAZI!!!

The NSA can work some magic, but we're talking 60,000 emails here. She pretty much broke every government Information Security rule there is. There should be criminal charges filed against her for it. Anyone "normal" person working for the government would have the book thrown at them for the same thing, and she surely had much higher level information going back and forth in those emails,.

G.W. Bush lost more than 5 MILLION emails, meaning he is 80+x more culpable the H. Clinton.

Big difference: those weren't GW's emails but 100% of these are Rodham's emails. Also, which felony did GW commit swearing that he had turned over every document?

"Under federal law, the White House is required to maintain records, including e-mails, involving presidential decision- making and deliberations." But suddenly millions of the private RNC emails had gone missing; emails that were seen as potentially crucial evidence by Congressional investigators.

Bush "lost" 5 million wrote:

G.W. Bush lost more than 5 MILLION emails, meaning he is 80+x more culpable the H. Clinton.

I'm fine with both of them being incarcerated. Are you?

Where did you read that they were GW's emails? Your reading doesn't appear to be very precise. Where did you read that GW perjured himself like Rodham did?

Also, let's just say that GW did delete emails (there's been nothing to suggest this btw), then what does that have to do with Rodham also criminally doing that? It's not like it's a defense to point to other people who broke the law like you did. Grasp of the law does not to be your strong suit.

Sorry, after thinking a few seconds I realize my hot head got the better of me. I believe all republicans are clean, and only democrats are dirty.

okie dokie wrote:

Bush "lost" 5 million wrote:

G.W. Bush lost more than 5 MILLION emails, meaning he is 80+x more culpable the H. Clinton.

I'm fine with both of them being incarcerated. Are you?

Stick both of them in the can.

Bush and Clinton as cellmate! What happens when Bill or Laura come over for a congeal visit?

But GW Bush isn't running for president in 2016, now is he?

If the IRS, DEA, FBI, CIA ever come after me and want all of my mails I'll just tell them it was all stored on my cloud ever @hillaryclinton.com

See if that works.

adsfasfdsf wrote:

But GW Bush isn't running for president in 2016, now is he?

Yeah, but his half wit brother is.

Not to worry. Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton in 2016 is cast in stone. Nothing will stop that from happening. Of course, Independents will run but as usual they won't have a chance of winning.

That's the FOB defense for Rodham's felonies? The brother of someone who didn't do what she did is going to run against her? Start up the Warren bus because this Titanic is taking on water fast.

The one thing I will give Rodham credit for is that she is very in touch with how completely stupid and clueless most of her party is. She knows full well that she could rob a bank and she will have the full backing of the NYT, MSNBC and the clowns on here trying to defend her felonies here. It must be nice to know that there are so many complete morons out there who don't care what a disgusting, vile and criminal person you are.

Your point could apply to either party. The fact that you fail to see that is evidence that you are among the "stupid and clueless".

Idiot detector wrote:

Your point could apply to either party. The fact that you fail to see that is evidence that you are among the "stupid and clueless".

Most Republicans that I know bailed on W long before 2008 when it was obvious that he was incompetent and make no apologies about being disappointed in him. Most Democrats still like Rodham even though it is glaringly obvious that she is a despicable person who now most likely also is a criminal. Your claim that both parties are the same here fails and it appears that you are just one of the many stupid and clueless Democrats. At least you have a lot of people to keep you company.